Return-Path: <office@buttar.hk>
Received: from web.buttar.hk
	by web.buttar.hk with LMTP id uEgDJEhRaFshTAAAQrwfMQ
	; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 21:46:48 +0800
Return-path: <office@buttar.hk>
Envelope-to: office@buttar.hk
Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Aug 2018 21:46:48 +0800
Received: from [84.117.9.118] (port=34109)
	by web.buttar.hk with esmtp (Exim 4.91)
	(envelope-from <office@buttar.hk>)
	id 1fmfqQ-0005AM-ED
	for office@buttar.hk; Mon, 06 Aug 2018 21:46:48 +0800
Message-ID: <F367F3DB9F674FB723B79FDB230BF367@CK9OGPR>
From: <office@buttar.hk>
To: <office@buttar.hk>
Subject: Hey!
Date: 6 Aug 2018 18:34:02 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="cp-850"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3979
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3979
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-57.1
X-Spam-Score: -570
X-Spam-Bar: ---------------------------------------------------
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "web.buttar.hk",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.

 Content preview:  my nipples are like a stone http://eva-solutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/kYC6Zu.html
    [...]

 Content analysis details:   (-57.1 points, 5.0 required)

  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: eva-solutions.com]
  3.3 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS        RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS
                             [84.117.9.118 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
  4.4 RCVD_IN_XBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
 -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST      From: address is in the user's white-list
  2.0 URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_SPAM   Contains an abused spamvertized URL listed in
                             the Spamhaus DBL blocklist
                             [URIs: eva-solutions.com]
  1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL        RBL: Relay in RNBL,
                             https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
                             [84.117.9.118 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
  4.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL      RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
                             [84.117.9.118 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
  1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
                 [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?84.117.9.118>]
  2.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
  3.0 BAYES_95               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 95 to 99%
                             [score: 0.9758]
  1.9 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
                             [cf: 100]
  0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK           Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
  6.2 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5      RBL: Very bad reputation (-5)
                             [84.117.9.118 listed in bl.mailspike.net]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL      Mailspike blacklisted
  2.0 HDR_ORDER_FTSDMCXX_DIRECT Header order similar to spam
                             (FTSDMCXX/boundary variant) direct-to-MX
  2.0 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
  1.5 HDR_ORDER_FTSDMCXX_NORDNS Header order similar to spam
                             (FTSDMCXX/boundary variant) + no rDNS
  1.0 XPRIO_SHORT_SUBJ       Has X-Priority header + short subject
  2.5 DOS_OE_TO_MX           Delivered direct to MX with OE headers
  3.5 URI_WP_HACKED          URI for compromised WordPress site, possible malware
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 180806-4, 08/06/2018), Inbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean