've been thinking it for a while. I bit my tongue on optics until it was indefensible. Read an article in my bookmarks about the two psychologicallyt distinct altrights and realized there's no reason I should be in anything that Heimbach is in.

And came back to the same issue I brought up before: "we cant get rid of the spergs"

But I noticed over dissident right groups dont have this issue and WNs constantly do...and then I stole the rationale from Distributist and AltHype to arrive from there

you need to state what you believe or else you'll constantly have to make weak excuses. Distributist's critique is actually his critique of liberalism: it can actually be used to either justify or ignore a lot of bad stuff because it says a lot about very little at the end of the day, some other force will shape how people interpret its best application or just supplant it outright

this doesnt mean I think race is of lesser importance or wont resist bilious bastards trying to hook me on their preferred ideology (which is why I've often been dismissive of this kind of rhetoric), nor do I even think a racial political movement is bad (since right now race is how everyone is being primed to think) but clearly it needs to be more Jared Taylor than Larping Faggotry and this is a better way to achieve that than monomaniacally focusing on race imo