(1:59:50 PM) ontologyExpunged: Hey.
(2:00:13 PM) gA: Hey
(2:00:15 PM) gA: Sup?
(2:00:34 PM) ontologyExpunged: So....is it *possible* for someone to have Faun as a native class? On account of non-linearity with timelines, prior to Sburb.org?
(2:00:49 PM) gA: But of course.
(2:01:09 PM) gA: It was as common as Maid, pre-Clown
(2:01:15 PM) ontologyExpunged: Hmmm.
(2:01:22 PM) ontologyExpunged: What kind of person would -get- Faun?
(2:01:32 PM) gA: Hm
(2:01:59 PM) gA: Maid is given to people that don't want to help,
(2:02:08 PM) gA: To apathetic
(2:02:14 PM) gA: Faun would be the same
(2:02:23 PM) gA: Dull ones, never acting out
(2:02:37 PM) gA: Maybe even slothful, or in deep grief?
(2:04:06 PM) ontologyExpunged: Hmm.
(2:04:19 PM) ontologyExpunged: Maid is sort of 'don't get involved,' isn't it?
(2:04:23 PM) gA: Yep
(2:04:36 PM) ontologyExpunged: Hmm.
(2:04:43 PM) gA: Note that Active Helper would be a bit counter intuitive
(2:04:46 PM) ontologyExpunged: It is!
(2:04:50 PM) gA: In the same way Dame is active Protector
(2:04:59 PM) gA: Selfishly defend others
(2:05:01 PM) gA: ...
(2:05:06 PM) ontologyExpunged: you'll get the best results if you're doing it because you *want to*
(2:05:15 PM) ontologyExpunged: not because they need it.
(2:05:25 PM) ontologyExpunged: It's sort of about learning how altruism is its own reward.
(2:05:40 PM) gA: But it is my idea that some of class pairs are more active (Prince/Bard) and some are much less (Dame/Guard)
(2:05:46 PM) gA: Yes, that is
(2:05:48 PM) gA: That is good.
(2:06:02 PM) gA: Still, Faun/Maid would be rather more passive pair
(2:10:40 PM) ontologyExpunged: yep.