Guest User

Scilabus | L’écriture inclusive a-t-elle un intérêt ?

a guest
Mar 10th, 2022
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 9.95 KB | None | 0 0
  1. 1. Renström EA, Lindqvist A, Sendén MG. The multiple meanings of the gender‐inclusive pronoun hen: Predicting attitudes and use. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2022;(January 2021):1–20.
  2. 2. Bibliographie pour celles et ceux qui s’intéressent au langage inclusif. 2021;(2016).
  3. 3. Friedrich MCG, Drößler V, Oberlehberg N, Heise E. The Influence of the Gender Asterisk (“Gendersternchen”) on Comprehensibility and Interest. Front Psychol. 2021;12(December):1–11.
  4. 4. Redl T, Frank SL, de Swart P, de Hoop H. The male bias of a generically-intended masculine pronoun: Evidence from eye-tracking and sentence evaluation. PLoS One [Internet]. 2021;16(4 April):1–30. Available from:
  5. 5. Kricheli-Katz T, Regev T. The effect of language on performance: do gendered languages fail women in maths? npj Sci Learn [Internet]. 2021;6(1):1–7. Available from:
  6. 6. Gygax P, Sato S, Öttl A, Gabriel U. The masculine form in grammatically gendered languages and its multiple interpretations: a challenge for our cognitive system. Lang Sci [Internet]. 2021;83:101328. Available from:
  7. 7. Burnett H, Pozniak C. Political dimensions of gender inclusive writing in Parisian universities. J Socioling. 2021;25(5):808–31.
  8. 8. Vergoossen HP, Pärnamets P, Renström EA, Gustafsson Sendén M. Are New Gender-Neutral Pronouns Difficult to Process in Reading? The Case of Hen in SWEDISH. Front Psychol. 2020;11(November).
  9. 9. Sato M. The neurobiology of sex differences during language processing in healthy adults: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia [Internet]. 2020;140(April 2019):107404. Available from:
  10. 10. Sato S, Casaponsa A, Athanasopoulos P. Flexing Gender Perception: Brain Potentials Reveal the Cognitive Permeability of Grammatical Information. Cogn Sci. 2020;44(9).
  11. 11. Gygax P, Gabriel U. Le masculin et ses multiples sens : Un problème pour notre cerveau … et notre société Gygax , P ., Gabriel , U . & Zufferey , S . ( 2019 ). Le masculin et ses multiples sens : Un problème pour notre cerveau ... et notre société . Savoirs en Prisme , 10 , e-publication Le masculin et ses multiples sens : Un problème pour notre cerveau … et notre société Pascal Gygax Université de Fribourg , Suisse Ute Gabriel Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim , Norvège Sandrine Zufferey Université de Berne , Suisse. 2019;(December).
  12. 12. Burnett H, Bonami O. Linguistic prescription, ideological structure, and the actuation of linguistic changes: Grammatical gender in French parliamentary debates. Lang Soc. 2019;48(1):65–93.
  13. 👓 13. Friedrich MCG, Heise E. Does the use of gender-fair language influence the comprehensibility of texts?: An experiment using an authentic contract manipulating single role nouns and pronouns. Swiss J Psychol. 2019;78(1–2):51–60.
  14. 👓 14. Misersky J, Majid A, Snijders TM. Grammatical Gender in German Influences How Role-Nouns Are Interpreted: Evidence from ERPs. Discourse Process [Internet]. 2019;56(8):643–54. Available from:
  15. 15. Gygax PM, Schoenhals L, Lévy A, Luethold P, Gabriel U. Exploring the onset of a male-biased interpretation of masculine generics among french speaking kindergarten children. Front Psychol. 2019;10(MAY):1–10.
  16. 16. Powell JL, Furlong J, de Bézenac CE, O’Sullivan N, Corcoran R. The Pragmatics of Pragmatic Language and the Curse of Ambiguity: An fMRI Study. Neuroscience. 2019;418:96–109.
  17. 17. Gygax P, Thomas C, Didierjean A, Kuhn G. Are Women Perceived as Worse Magicians Than Men? Gender Bias When Evaluating Magic Tricks. Soc Psychol Bull. 2019;14(3).
  18. 👓 18. Ortego KM. Is the Chicken Ready to Eat? Electrophysiological Signatures of Ambiguity in the Brain. Reed College; 2018.
  19. 19. Misersky J. The effects of grammatical gender on reference processing in german: an ERP study. Proc Master’s Program Cogn Neurosci Radboud Univ. 2017;12(1).
  20. 20. Harris CA, Blencowe N, Telem DA. What is in a Pronoun?: Why Gender-fair Language Matters. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2017;266(6):932–3. Available from:
  21. 21. Cibelli E, Xu Y, Austerweil JL, Griffiths TL, Regier T. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis and probabilistic inference: Evidence from the domain of color. PLoS One [Internet]. 2016;11(7):1–28. Available from:
  22. 22. Su JJ, Molinaro N, Gillon-Dowens M, Tsai PS, Wu DH, Carreiras M. When “He” Can also be “She”: An ERP study of reflexive pronoun resolution in written Mandarin Chinese. Front Psychol. 2016;7(February):1–15.
  23. 23. Gygax PM, Garnham A, Doehren S. What do true gender ratios and stereotype norms really tell us? Front Psychol. 2016;7(JUL):1–6.
  24. 24. Gygax P, Ute Gabriel. The masculine form and its competing interpretations in French: When linking grammatically masculine role names to female referents is difficult. 2016;(July):1–23.
  25. 25. Sczesny S, Formanowicz M, Moser F. Can Gender-Fair Language Reduce Gender Stereotyping and Discrimination? Front Psychol. 2016;7(February):1–11.
  26. 26. Horvath LK, Merkel EF, Maass A, Sczesny S. Does gender-fair language pay off? The social perception of professions from a cross-linguistic perspective. Front Psychol. 2016;6(JAN):1–12.
  27. 27. Reali C, Esaulova Y, Öttl A, Von Stockhausen L. Role descriptions induce gender mismatch effects in eye movements during reading. Front Psychol. 2015;6(NOV).
  28. 28. Vervecken D, Gygax PM, Gabriel U, Guillod M, Hannover B. Warm-hearted businessmen, competitive housewives? Effects of gender-fair language on adolescents’ perceptions of occupations. Front Psychol. 2015;6(September):1–10.
  29. 29. Sczesny S, Moser F, Wood W. Beyond sexist beliefs: How do people decide to use gender-inclusive language? Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2015;41(7):943–54.
  30. 30. Oriane Sarrasin, Ute Gabriel, Gygax P. SEXISM AND ATTITUDES TOWARD GENDER-NEUTRAL LANGUAGE. Swiss J Psychol. 2015;74(1):1–37.
  31. 31. Gustafsson Sendén M, Bäck EA, Lindqvist A. Introducing a gender-neutral pronoun in a natural gender language: the influence of time on attitudes and behavior. Front Psychol. 2015;6(July):1–12.
  32. 32. Canal P, Garnham A, Oakhill J. Beyond gender stereotypes in language comprehension: Self sex-role descriptions affect the brain’s potentials associated with agreement processing. Front Psychol. 2015;6(DEC):1–17.
  33. 33. Kuhn EA, Gabriel U. Actual and Potential Gender-Fair Language Use: The Role of Language Competence and the Motivation to Use Accurate Language. J Lang Soc Psychol. 2014;33(2):214–25.
  34. 34. Vervecken D, Hannover B, Wolter I. Changing (S)expectations: How gender fair job descriptions impact children’s perceptions and interest regarding traditionally male occupations. J Vocat Behav [Internet]. 2013;82(3):208–20. Available from:
  35. 35. Sato S, Gygax PM, Gabriel U. Gender inferences: Grammatical features and their impact on the representation of gender in bilinguals. Bilingualism. 2013;16(4):792–807.
  36. 36. Gygax P, Gabriel U. Generically intended, but specifically interpreted: When musicians are all men. J Chem Inf Model. 2013;53:1689–99.
  37. 37. Veldhuis D, Kurvers J. Offline segmentation and online language processing units. Writ Lang Lit. 2012;15(2):165–84.
  38. 38. Prewitt-Freilino JL, Caswell TA, Laakso EK. The Gendering of Language: A Comparison of Gender Equality in Countries with Gendered, Natural Gender, and Genderless Languages. Sex Roles. 2012;66(3–4):268–81.
  39. 39. Kornmeier J, Bach M. Ambiguous figures - what happens in the brain when perception changes but not the stimulus. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6(MARCH 2012):1–23.
  40. 40. Douglas KM, Sutton RM. “A Giant Leap for Mankind”, but What About Women? The Role of System-Justifying Ideologies in Predicting Attitudes Toward Sexist Language. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2010;40(2):366–74.
  41. 41. Gabriel U, Gygax P. Can societal language amendments change gender representation? The case of Norway. Scand J Psychol. 2008;49(5):451–7.
  42. 42. Brauer M. Un ministre peut-il tomber enceinte ? L’impact du générique masculin sur les représentations mentales. L’Année Psychol. 2008;108(02):243.
  43. 👓 43. Gygax P, Gabriel U, Sarrasin O, Oakhill J, Garnham A. Generically intended, but specifically interpreted: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics are all men. Lang Cogn Process. 2008;23(3):464–85.
  44. 👓 44. Ute G, Gygax P, Sarrasin O, Garnham A, Oakhill J. Au pairs are rarely male: Norms on the gender perception of role names across English, French, and German. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40(1):206–12.
  45. 45. Gygax P, Gesto N. Féminisation of language and hindering reading. Annee Psychol. 2007;107(2):239–55.
  46. 46. Gorfein DS, Brown VR, DeBiasi C. The activation-selection model of meaning: Explaining why the son comes out after the sun. Mem Cogn. 2007;35(8):1986–2000.
  47. 👓 47. Gygax P, Gesto N. Féminisation et lourdeur de texte. L’Année Psychol. 2007;107(02):239.
  48. 48. Irmen L. What’s in a (role) name? Formal and conceptual aspects of comprehending personal nouns. J Psycholinguist Res. 2007;36(6):431–56.
  49. 49. Chatard A, Guimont S, Martinot D. Impact de la féminisation lexicale des professions sur l’auto-efficacité des élèves : une remise en cause de l’universalisme masculin ? Annee Psychol. 2005;105(2):249–72.
  50. 50. Swim JK, Mallett R, Stangor C. Understanding subtle sexism: Detection and use of sexist language. Sex Roles. 2004;51(3–4):117–28.
  51. 51. Roberton JBPMA. Contemporary Arguments Against Non sexist Language : Blaubergs (1980) Revisited. Change. 1998;39(1980).
  52. 52. Sczesny S, Sczesny S, Sczesny S, Hansen K. Just Reading ? How Gender-Fair Language Triggers Readers ’ Use of Gender-Fair Forms Related papers.
  53. 53. Gygax P, Garnham A, Oakhill J. Inferring Characters’ Emotional States: Can Readers Infer Specific Emotions?
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment