Advertisement
CuchuCachu

Videos

Nov 27th, 2017
89
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 1.94 KB | None | 0 0
  1. what has he talked about? R/k? Subspecies? Finding the genes? Not twin studies, anything to do with the IQ tests themselves, or even touched on heritability
  2.  
  3. "I just now got around to watching Kraut's video on The Alt Right Is Too Dumb For Genetics And Physiology.
  4.  
  5. I'm 1 minute and 28 seconds in and he already create a loophole that he can use forever to shun away any claim by any race realist.
  6.  
  7. He takes all evidence pertaining to IQ (A social construct in the sense that we created the tests and gave it a number) and then ignores the racial (read: biological) correlation to the test results of a person's IQ and then say "These test results are the doing of social studies, not biological ones".
  8.  
  9. Nevermind the studies showing blacks to have fewer cortical neurons or less cranial capacity, the fact that they have shorter gestation time that they have earlier development both skeletally, dentally, motoristically. Nevermind the studies showing the difference in GO categories of biological processes enriched for higher Fst SNSs with Pvalue lower than 10 to the minus tenth showing a strong enrichment for dorsoventral neuraltube patterning, hindbrain development and positive regulation of neuron differentiation.
  10.  
  11. Nevermind the studies which name the specific genes like rs236330 or the mtDNA polymorphism EST00083 found more often in high IQ groups.
  12.  
  13. Nevermind any fucking study using biology to prove a social difference, because it's to him "a social study" and as such can be waved away because social studies are something that occurs on liberal campuses in Berkeley.
  14.  
  15. I'm 1½ minute in and I'm already pissed."
  16.  
  17. rs236330 is an SNP, not a gene!!!!!
  18.  
  19. But anyway, ways around this. We can challenge him to compare the molecular evidence for differences in IQ to the evidence for equality (there is none), but really it is simply mistaken. Using "social science" methods like twin studies are more accurate to gauge these things than molecular methods are.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement