I have a follower who goes by @TaamHartlis, he's making a spreadsheet with studies in suipport of race realism and was hoping he could get your input.

Also, another follower of mine wanted me to give you some studies. People are beginning use epigenetics and 'Missing Heritability' in GWAS as arguments against race realism, despite these being a very tenuous basis for such a counter-argument and he thinks these studies demonstrate that. And beyond even the conceptual issues with this approach, a lot of it is based on Speculation. Largely from Ken Richardson, whose work is now being increasingly cited.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0027964
https://www.nature.com/articles/ng.3404
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0186559
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221112471730726X
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/11/eaao1799.full
Figure a and figure 4 in particular for those last two. Basically, the underlying genetic sequence highly regulates epigenetics, and current methods in GWAS are under review
figure 6 in the 'partiitioning heritability' study is most important: " Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics"