Cryptosolar

about Internet and regulation

Aug 16th, 2015
378
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 9.88 KB | None | 0 0
  1. ttp://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/2013/12/13/bitcoin-regulation/
  2.  
  3. The fact that unsavory websites choose to deal in virtual currency, exclusively, should not be the
  4. impetus for Bitcoin regulation. The knee-jerk reaction to place Bitcoin as the villain in these
  5. instances is convenient propaganda cloaking a larger issue. How are these sites allowed to be
  6. accessed in the first place?
  7.  
  8. As Harvard Law School's, John Palfrey, eloquently states in his research paper, Four Phases of
  9. Internet Regulation, internet regulation is still in a fluid state. Here are a few excerpts from the
  10. paper which I implore all to read:
  11.  
  12.  
  13. -"Cross-cultural understanding could flourish as never before, now that
  14. these digital networks connect people from all around the world in new and important
  15. ways at very low cost. Communications across diaspora populations can thrive in
  16. meaningful ways."
  17.  
  18. -"The individual has greater autonomy in a networked public sphere."
  19.  
  20. -"The great power of the Internet as a force for democratization is in collective action."
  21.  
  22. "Any careful examination of a blogosphere will demonstrate, too, that there are also problems
  23. associated with what people do in these spaces. This is true whether the context is the Unites States
  24. or Myanmar. There are sound reasons for any state to seek to restrict online speech and to practice
  25. increased surveillance, from child protection to routine law enforcement, with which few would
  26. argue."
  27.  
  28. -"We ought to see information and communications technologies as connected to the rest of life in
  29. virtually every respect.
  30.  
  31. One of the primary reasons for Internet regulation is child safety, not new concerns but topics
  32. that are of universal interest to parents, teachers, and policy-makers around the world
  33.  
  34. Nearly all of the problems that arise in offline space find their way into the online
  35. environment, and in turn give rise to control strategies."
  36.  
  37. -"The thinking was that certain acts of speech and organizing onlineneeded to be regulated like any
  38. other. The initial reaction, by states such as China and Saudi Arabia in the first instance, was to
  39. erect filters or other means to block people from accessing certain information."
  40.  
  41. -"The question about Internet regulation, looking forward, needs to be inverted. Instead ofasking
  42. whether the Internet can be regulated, the question should be whether it will beregulated in
  43. precisely the same way, or more extensively, than the offline world as thestakes rise in the Access
  44. Contested era."
  45.  
  46. Bitcoin is simply a new technology that will further enable the most remote corners of the
  47. world to be brought into the Worldwide financial marketplace.
  48.  
  49. Imagine, for a moment, the aggregate total of missed opportunities because the talent can not
  50. resource the investment required to establish their craft.
  51. A world changing technology may exist in the mind of a woman in Zimbabwe, but because of
  52. existing technology, she may never be able to resource the required capital to build her craft.
  53.  
  54. With Bitcoin, she will be able to immediately monetize her blog that educates the world of her
  55. idea. Micro-donations via Bitcoin will replace "likes", "retweets" and "favorites" commonly
  56. used to vote on an idea.
  57. These donations will enable her to continue operating, while in beta phase of her presentation to the
  58. world.
  59.  
  60. Another paradigm is clear to see. If the controls are placed at the internet level, the global banking
  61. infrastructure can be used as a safe medium to transfer wealth from real world assets to virtual and
  62. vice-versa. Brokers, such as Coinbase, act as solid intermediaries of safe transfer. If you want
  63. unfettered access to each market, you should be willing to accept AML and KYC procedures.
  64.  
  65. These intermediary institutions are another point where control strategies can be employed.
  66. Unfortunately the black market will never be stamped out of existence. This is a human condition
  67. conversation more than it is a regulatory one.
  68.  
  69. Why throw away all of the opportunity that Bitcoin will unlock, when there exists fully accepted
  70. control strategies that can be written to embrace this technology. The opportunity for global
  71. advancement with proper use of Bitcoin, infinitely outweighs any bad, with proper management.
  72. We afforded the internet our collective "go ahead". We must allow Bitcoin the same opportunity.
  73.  
  74. Internet and regulation
  75.  
  76. http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/faculty-workshops/palfrey.faculty.workshop.summer.2010.pdf
  77.  
  78. John Palfrey
  79. Harvard Law School
  80. 1545 Massachusetts Avenue
  81. Cambridge, MA 02138
  82.  
  83.  
  84. The four phases of Internet regulation are the
  85. "open Internet" period,
  86. Phase 1: The Open Internet (the 1960s to 2000).
  87.  
  88.  
  89. During this initial period of the network's
  90. development,was the dominant theory ­ to the extent that anyone was thinking seriously
  91. about regulation at all ­ was that the Internet itself was a separate space, often called
  92. "cyberspace."
  93.  
  94. from the network's
  95. formation through about 2000; "access denied,"
  96. Phase 2: Access Denied (2000 to 2005).
  97.  
  98. Saudi Arabia(Türkei oder China etc.)
  99. in the first instance, was to erect filters or other means to block people from
  100. accessing certain information.
  101.  
  102. The fact that extensive Internet filtering occurs at a
  103. national level around the world is clearly documented. (Deibert et al. 2008 and 2010)
  104.  
  105. through about 2005; "access controlled,"
  106. through the present day (2010);
  107. Phase 3: Access Controlled (2005 to 2010).
  108.  
  109. These controls
  110. can change over time to respond to changing political and cultural environments that
  111. arise online and offline.
  112.  
  113. The image of the
  114. "Great Firewall of China"
  115. is evocative and, to some extent, accurate as a descriptive
  116. matter. But it is misleading insofar as it tells only a small part of the story of control
  117. online, in China and elsewhere
  118.  
  119. and "access contested,"
  120. the phase into which we are
  121. entering.
  122.  
  123. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/76/66
  124.  
  125. International Journal of Communication 1 (2007),
  126. Book Review 89-92 1932-8036/2007BKR0089
  127. Copyright © 2007 (Lauren B. Movius, [email protected]).
  128. Licensed under the Creative CommonsAttribution Non-commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd).
  129. Available at http://ijoc.org.
  130.  
  131. Jack Goldsmith and Tim Wu,
  132. Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World
  133. Oxford University Press, 2006, 226 pp., $18.50 (hardcover).
  134.  
  135. Reviewed by
  136.  
  137. Lauren B. Movius
  138. University of Southern California
  139.  
  140.  
  141. They are skeptical that recent technological changes
  142.  
  143. "have had a lasting effect on how nations, and their peoples, govern themselves"
  144.  
  145. (180). They suggest communication technologies
  146.  
  147. "did not displace the central role of territorial government in human governance,"
  148.  
  149. and neither will the Internet.
  150.  
  151. Goldsmith and Wu also caricature theories in discussing globalization which
  152. predicts the
  153.  
  154. "inevitable homogenization of everything."
  155.  
  156. Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World
  157.  
  158. appeals to graduate and undergraduate students, as well as
  159.  
  160. anyone interested in Internet regulation, politics of global governance,
  161. international law, and the intersection of globalization and technology.
  162. It is extremely well written in a clear and engaging style.
  163. The authors, who are both lawyers, avoid legal jargon and do a remarkable job
  164. of explaining complicated legal cases and concepts to readers. The book opens up important debates and
  165. raises serious questions.
  166.  
  167. The authors have slowed down the rush to pronounce the end of governments
  168. and corporations, as they repeatedly demonstrate the continuing power and importance of these
  169. institutions.
  170.  
  171. This moment in the Internet's evolving history allows scholars and practitioners an
  172. opportunity to debate, discuss, and consider these issues.
  173.  
  174. The Internet can be seen as an entry into the
  175. entire communication system,
  176. and its regulation and control will have far-reaching effects on society.
  177.  
  178. References
  179.  
  180. Abbate, Janet, (1999), Inventing the Internet, MIT Press.
  181.  
  182. Barlow, John Perry, Declaration of Cyberspace Independence,
  183.  
  184. (http://homes.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html)
  185.  
  186. Naughton, John, (1999), A Brief History of the Future: The Origins of the Internet, Diane Publishing Co.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment