Advertisement
Guest User

The GamerGate hypocrisy and how it relates to Hatred

a guest
Dec 18th, 2014
136
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.23 KB | None | 0 0
  1. 1. By buying Hatred you are supporting: a) The developers and their continued endavours. You are proving to them that they made a game that's worth the asking price. That's it.
  2. 2. By voting for the game on Greenlight because you think it will be fun, you are doing nothing wrong. Personally, I have serious concerns about your tastes and mental state to even consider what we have seen as anything worthwile, but at the end of the day, it is your decision and on that issue, only your own opinion matters. I'll still reserve my right to tell you it's fucking retarded though.
  3. 3. By voting for the game on Greenlight just because it's anti-SJW, not because it's a good game, you are displaying anti-consumer behavior to benefit your own political beliefs.
  4.  
  5. The vast majority of people voting for the game are anti-SJW "warriors" of their own. For instance: http://funnyjunk.com/Gabes+defeats+the+sjws/funny-pictures/5391641/
  6. Or you can simply go to the Steam Greenlight page and see the evidence in the comments. It doesn't take long to put 2 and 2 together.
  7.  
  8. This is intellectually dishonest behavior, since it has nothing to do with actual quality or potential of the game in question. It's only about it fitting your personal agenda. THIS is my problem. My problem is NOT that Hatred is "art", it's NOT that it exists, it's NOT that it will probably be terrible going by the vast amount of evidence just looking at the first trailer that sounds like some angsty teenager wrote in their diary before commiting a school shooting. My problem is the dishonest nature of the people backing the game. They are NOT interested in improving video games as an art form, they are NOT interested in displaying pro-consumer behavior, they don't care about good video games - only that they represent their opinions. And that's EXCACTLY where the issue lies - because that's what GamerGate has been fighting against since the fucking beginning. How can you people not see this? It's incredible. Depression Quest got SLAMMED because of unethical behavior from the games media and Zoe Quinn, who developed it. Yes, it was wrong, and the game was bad. It was FUNCTIONAL, but not a good game. This is the EXACT SAME THING in reverse and you're all taking the bait.
  9.  
  10. Open your eyes. Please.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement