Assuming everything stated is true - I don't endorse what Iskall allegedly did as moral.
Assuming everything stated is true - I don't endorse what Iskall allegedly did as cool.
However, I also don't see rejecting flirtations and promises as equal to victimhood, either.
I'm troubled by the lack of clear evidence against Iskall, but I'm willing to weigh this assuming it's true.
I'm also troubled by the amount of ad hominem attacks being thrown at everyone and anyone who doesn't share in thinking this amounts to victimhood or SA.
By this standard, if a girl flirts with me and I reject her advances (and maybe she isn't single), I'm a "victim".  I surely don't think so.  I just think rejecting her makes me moderately intelligent.
Circling back, now - I might see victimhood if there was evidence to sustain that.  Even if I accept all that is alleged, I'm not seeing victimhood yet.
I wonder what harsh name-calling is about to be levied against me for thinking so.