My Political Garbage

                      My Political Garbage:
                         1st posting date 2020Aug14

subtitle: "Will somebody please spam/repost this all over the internet? It was probably written by a Russian troll."


All humans alive today and throughout all of history (with the exception of one (whom is not me)), are LESS than worthless. There is a reason humans have value though (it has to do with economics supply and demand (and it's probably not what you think it is)).


Giving rights or freedom to people takes away rights and freedom from people. Wud dat *bleep* I say?

 If a country's government guarantees people a right to life, then naturally, people's rights to defend themselves with lethal force must be taken away. Also then murder victim's families are denied their right to justice (a life for a life is true justice).
Also no I don't support the death penalty (I am a hypocrite but not because of this issue).

A much more extreme example, if government gives people the right of freedom (from slavery), then slave owners rights of ownership are taken away. NO, I don't support slavery.

If people want their government to give them a right to "be kept safe", then their government steps in to take away many of their rights in order to keep them safe. You can't have the right to safety and the right to risk your own life at the same time.

If people want their governments to give them ANY rights, they have to give up their right to some of their own money or work (pay taxes or otherwise support the government).

If people want the right to "free" healthcare, then naturally taxes have to be raised (taking away a larger percentage of people's rightful earnings).

If people want the right to own property, then they must mostly give up their right of finders-keepers.

If we decide to guarantee rights to some people that meet certain criteria, this not only implies but also REQUIRES taking away rights from people that don't meet those criteria.




      Democratic governments always seem to be based on GIVING people rights, but that's not what governments do. Governments aren't CAPABLE of giving people rights, they are only capable of TAKING rights from people.
You may scoff, but I ask:
How do governments give people rights? Answer: they take the right to govern upon themselves.
That's right, in order to get rights from a government, you have to GIVE that government all of your rights (governments control people, it's what they do).

Furthermore, governments are NOT some big shadowy unknown entities, they are PEOPLE. Groups of people retaining primitive dominance over the people they govern.

That's what all of human civilization IS. People trying to gain the upper hand (gain control over) other people.
Our civilization is and ALWAYS HAS BEEN a massive power struggle involving everyone alive. And it matters little weather we call the people that have the upper hand "the government" or if we call them something else like "boss" or even some other classification.

So, am I advocating anarchy? No I am not. People may have an infinite rights in anarchy (and I like that), but people also have ZERO rights in anarchy (and I don't like that).

In anarchy, people can do what ever the *bleep* they want, but conversely that means other people can do what ever the *bleep* TO them.

In anarchy, there is no one to ENFORCE (and by enforce I mean take away rights) people's right to life or to freedom or to own property.

The whole purpose of government is to make it easier (more peaceful?) for people to live together in civilization.

True freedom is not possible for humans because we ALWAYS abuse it. Likewise, governments that are made up of humans always abuse their power (and a governments power is it's right(s)).


Socialism doesn't work, and that's because the government is made up of humans.
Capitalism doesn't work, and that's because of the humans involved in it.

We can either give our governments all our rights so that our governments will be powerful enough to enforce our rights (and powerful enough to kill and oppress us all),
or we can take all the rights away from our governments and take the freedom to ourselves to destroy ourselves (and have a good time doing it).

What we actually need is some kind of balance between these two (and it's not necessarily 50/50), where our governments are strong enough to guarantee us SOME rights, but NOT strong enough to take away ALL our rights.



People please! Have some UN-common sense! Stop advocating for 100% government control! Stop advocating for 0% government control!
Start supporting a sane balance of FUNCTIONING checks and balances and LIMITED but existing government control.



Also, maybe instead of asking governments to do things their not capable of like, "give us the right to live",
we should ask them to do things like, "take away our right to kill each other".

That kind of reasoning makes more sense because it's the actual physical truth, human governments DO NOT HAVE anything that they can give us. They ONLY HAVE the ability to TAKE from us.


Also, maybe instead of giving governing rights in addition to regular citizen rights and higher pay to leaders and governors, we should take away citizen rights when giving governing rights and give lower pay to people in charge of governing us (the goal being to drive people who are motivated by greed away from wanting to run for office).




Also: what gives humans added value is God. God gives us value simply by being the ultimate source of demand and valuing us at the same time. Furthermore, the only human being whom actually has value is Jesus Christ the LORD.



Meh. Nobody cares about my stupid *bleep* political garbage.


.