Thank you for the analysis, I 100% agree with you on the matter. I just saw the video and read your analysis above, and I feel like people think silence means guilty. In many investigations this is not true, as publicity could hamper the investigation of the authorities. Also I feel like the part that the writer of this Personal Statement is focusing on is the fact that they got led on. Which while socially is not very nice, isnt an unlawfull/criminal act, which you did describe very well in you analysis. Now I also understand that emotionally being played can be very hurtful, it is not a reason to publicly defame someone. Imagine every time someone got rejected after they talked to someone and thought they were into them just for it not to be the case. I do think, considering nothing illegal has been done (as far as we can see from the evidence thus far deliverd) it should not have been publicly handled, but in private. This probably could have been handled if they had confronted Iskall with this in private (maybe they have and nothing was achieved) and from that go forwards. Taking the step to instantly go public is in my opinion escalating the situation, and resulting in a bad outcome for all parties involved no matter the outcome of the legal investigation.