Lord/Zone/Lametta Logs


Zone - Last Tuesday at 1:35 PM
Been busy the last few days
Sorry for not responding
Lametta - Last Tuesday at 1:36 PM
its fine
Zone - Last Tuesday at 6:07 PM
What’s the vote discussion about
Just a summary
Lametta - Last Tuesday at 6:07 PM
check the
its a vote
to remove me
for my hostility
Zone - Last Tuesday at 6:07 PM
Why
What hostility
Lametta - Last Tuesday at 6:08 PM
I was a little rude with Yank and saying that some of the ideas were dumb and some of the council members were malicious. They took that as a threat or something and immediately voted to remove me.
I told them they could just tell me to stop.
lmao
Zone - Last Tuesday at 6:10 PM
:rolling_eyes::rolling_eyes::rolling_eyes:
Zone - Last Tuesday at 7:05 PM
What’s going on
I just finished work and voting
Lametta - Last Tuesday at 7:05 PM
I was removed for being harsh to the staff members.
only 3 people discussed it
everyone else just did it
Zone - Last Tuesday at 7:06 PM
Are you no longer council or
Lametta - Last Tuesday at 7:06 PM
I wanted them to wait until you and Lord could say something.
Yeah, I was kicked and brought back without council.
Zone - Last Tuesday at 7:06 PM
Lord isn’t going to
And I’ve been at work
Lametta - Last Tuesday at 7:06 PM
yeah he is gonna be back in
like 5000 minutes
lmao
5640
Zone - Last Tuesday at 7:07 PM
Well
That’s not great
So how is that a good reason for removal
Lametta - Last Tuesday at 7:39 PM
I personally said that it should not have been set up for removal.
It was something that can be resolved without such a hasty action - especially one as eager as removal.
That's why the mods were given the ability to vote though. It wasn't shocking that this happened.
Zone - Last Tuesday at 8:00 PM
Theyre dumb
Im about to talk about it, but I dont believe u should have been removed
Ur screwing urself
By threatening to leak the logs
Js
Lametta - Last Tuesday at 8:11 PM
I DIDNT WHAT
I DIDNT THREATEN TO LEAK LOGS
I SAID GB SHOULD RELEASE THE LOGS TO EXPOSE THE LIES HE TOLD THE MODS WITH AUZRIC
I also apparently don't qualify for the board which was only in spite of me fromAuzric.
I literally told them I wasn't threatening anything.
I swear if they lie about me again. Check vote discussion they took it out of context.
Zone - Last Tuesday at 8:29 PM
Thats what theyre saying
I just tried backing u up in vote discussion
Lametta - Last Tuesday at 8:32 PM
omg its in the vote discussion its not even hidden
i didnt threaten to leak anything
i literally told them not to make it sound like that wtf
I literally ASKED for permission.
Zone - Last Tuesday at 8:34 PM
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/395883745674264576/453763145601777664/councillogs.png

yah
LordLancer - Last Tuesday at 8:51 PM
Hmm...
LordLancer - Last Tuesday at 9:04 PM
I fear only two options remain now
Until Thursday, lads
Lametta - Last Tuesday at 9:05 PM
Scroll all the way up. That was taken out of context.
Beforehand I REQUESTED it.
I'll find it later.
Zone - Last Tuesday at 9:10 PM
I basically destroyed their opinions
Lametta - Last Tuesday at 9:30 PM
ill check in a bit
LordLancer - Last Tuesday at 9:40 PM
Fret not, Lametta
If I had a keyboard, Zone and I would have had you back on council by now
Zone - Last Tuesday at 9:42 PM
^
It's just getting harder at this point when the majority is against u due to laziness with not looking into the situation more
Lametta - Last Tuesday at 10:06 PM
It's also pretty concerning that Auz removed me from the board when I qualified and when I voiced it they acted spiteful.
All of them.
June 6, 2018
Zone - Last Wednesday at 12:28 PM
Did u remove a message
Lametta - Last Wednesday at 12:28 PM
yeah
someone changed the scc logo it looked awful but its fixed now
LordLancer - Last Wednesday at 5:30 PM
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/446479566475624449/454079705386319902/Screenshot_2018-06-06-20-27-24.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/446479566475624449/454079722083713026/Screenshot_2018-06-06-20-28-52.png
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/446479566475624449/454079742308777984/Screenshot_2018-06-06-20-22-07.png
Lametta - Last Wednesday at 5:58 PM
i can send other stuff too lol
Lametta - Last Wednesday at 6:56 PM
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/446479566475624449/454101285927387136/Screenshot_2018-06-06-18-55-39.png
They did this in spite of me. Council members know the punishment was only for a week and he is trying to make it sound like I unbanned her randomly without telling anyone. lol
We're going to have a massive problem apparently.
Lametta - Last Wednesday at 11:47 PM
I've got a lot of stuff to share all of a sudden.
June 7, 2018
Lametta - Yesterday at 12:25 AM
As I was once again threatened. xd
LordLancer - Yesterday at 10:27 AM
By?
Lametta - Yesterday at 10:33 AM
I'll post it momentarily but I already dealt with it so it isn't a problem. In fact I'd rather it not be shared because I don't want to cause more problems but I'll show in a bit.
I'll post what I've gathered.
https://gyazo.com/4b0293d60d4bffe689b29ba68906cccf
Gyazo
Gyazo


first off, my summary. ^
Don't bring this one up right away because of what I'm going to post next
https://gyazo.com/8268aa25b5827121388b32ddc3461acc
Gyazo
Gyazo


Lametta - Yesterday at 11:00 AM
https://gyazo.com/e6a7bc975169ab6b313f219f472bcf31
Gyazo
Gyazo


Proven inefficient for decision making:
https://gyazo.com/8206cb69bc4bfc7d9acc132421fc9c0c
Gyazo
Gyazo


Kam was already inefficient for decision making. She hates drama and rather than discussed the issue at hand, she rushed for a vote to happen.
Mudi with-holding information:
https://gyazo.com/76187fea43d4936926eabf4fdddef25a
Gyazo
Gyazo


Zelv saying he hasn't "leaked information" disregarding the "sides" meaning he is with-holding information:
https://gyazo.com/5519a818692f80d65569a1785821c1c1
Gyazo
Gyazo


Kam also admitted to council members talking with moderators in secrecy about the removal of a council member and it was claimed by a "petition" though was done in secret and only involved people they would know would agree with it - as they did not come to me because they wanted it to remain secret. o_O
Blocky also took my "threat" to leak the logs out of context which you proved was a request while those I asked still considered it to be a threat:
https://gyazo.com/05184481c3086078f2057f282d027340 / https://gyazo.com/deb232474a6d86db62bd03978864cac7
Gyazo
Gyazo


Gyazo
Gyazo


Given that Kam, Qesk, and Mudi are closely affiliated with Auzric, I believe they do not qualify to vote. Zelv already admitted he knew part of the story and said things might've changed if I was given more time so speak: https://gyazo.com/373e11f8e0dfb8fa89bef77ced9e16a2
Gyazo
Gyazo


Just a little fact:
https://gyazo.com/9eac58c43f3a31bdb99b7b92caabd267
Gyazo
Gyazo


Indications of Blocky's corruption which will be revealed further in a moment - https://gyazo.com/dd93daf5f1e35017b02a8d852807a726
Gyazo
Gyazo


It'll be hard to gather more evidence against some of the council because I don't have council chatroom logs anymore. :sweat: I'll have to use what I gathered in vote discussion.
Mind you I already knew I'd be removed, so my focus wasn't defending myself, it was exposing them publicly so I could use it against them and you'll see that in a moment.
Aside from Kam just taking pictures of the group chat I made for you to defend yourself, here was everything she posted with a bit of past info adding to it. This will prove Kam's vote was clearly illegitimate and proven an unworthy decision maker.
https://gyazo.com/a5d06ce6ac93eeb5d5926af52d6a4e06 / https://gyazo.com/5bb7adc032b81fd9d81017693068abca / https://gyazo.com/9a0f8aabf0be539d4b11e1cb2db2a99e / (still assumed I was going to leak) https://gyazo.com/274ac4fc2d50f8c7473dc2cc882003d8 / (after that she only mocked) https://gyazo.com/8c300ffb5909cd4bef75348df185665b / (rushing) https://gyazo.com/00196c6a67afc5213ab079e16b3f5224 / https://gyazo.com/954a5f507d2b0a3b67c82bee2b4ec1c3 / (rushing 3) https://gyazo.com/2971fadc9af8adfcd4a82ee6e0e1de67 / (rushing 4) https://gyazo.com/c4f57b7d91d08637126d8b365b0e9e4a / (exposed for rushing) https://gyazo.com/f242bf95df086101596c1eebd1bb549c / (her defense) https://gyazo.com/087abbd8286b7960ae7d9fbbf1ff2538 / (her second defense which judging by all the screenshots proves wrong) https://gyazo.com/5b94a2a1709f982399100ffb0a12659f / https://gyazo.com/b53bdbb7bae3321695382ee3288d54d7 / (this is just casual talk) https://gyazo.com/865042799809a5f3f477d3fe41f86e93 / (exposing that very few people actually talked and simply voted) https://gyazo.com/25b7b925c034907d4b4010ed960b8808 / (more rushing) https://gyazo.com/5249890c1ce86ad62b34f42938b1f50f / (more rushing) https://gyazo.com/72578ae0d5ee673af0c9710ec4516528
Gyazo
Gyazo


Gyazo
Gyazo


Gyazo
Gyazo


Gyazo
Gyazo


Gyazo
Gyazo


Kam also took my words completely out of context to make it sound like I was harassing her. That was apparently towards her desire to get council or something. :shrug:
As for Jack, I can't quote from the council chat, but I find it strange that he is a) biased to Tristan and bypassed our voting system to unban Tristan for a multitude of crimes, b) strange how he was willing to hear Joe's side of the story but when Kam brought up I harassed her, he kept it secret for several days and never bothered to hear my side and used it in a trial against me, proving he was clearly ambitious.
Jack using Blocky's quote out of context to make it sound like I was going to maliciously leak the council logs if they removed me, which is COMPLETELY false - as Zone has provided the full context of it.
https://gyazo.com/2c43a6ecaa23c337024e2a4434382122
Gyazo
Gyazo


LordLancer - Yesterday at 11:31 AM
Auzric's trial channel was already created. It'll begin when I return home
Lametta - Yesterday at 11:31 AM
https://gyazo.com/105743a5c7be69be10c35c841a990f8e
Gyazo
Gyazo


Nobody then could attack my point because no one actually had anything to say. Zelv concluded with this and everyone else did not bother to say anything beyond starting the vote - https://gyazo.com/0d993a904f40284244532c204db61947
Gyazo
Gyazo


I hinted and exposed that would be the case prior to bringing up my defense, and it remained true throughout the trial - https://gyazo.com/b3a842060386d8a8457078ebd3cc34f3
Gyazo
Gyazo


No other council members provided anything to these lies:
https://gyazo.com/28ca345c2d8633b5e8d1c3d8e2e327f2
Gyazo
Gyazo


Jack lied about it being anywhere but the vote-discussion channel because he knew the public couldn't view other chatrooms. If you checked yourself, then you can attest to what I said:
https://gyazo.com/86dddaa63b5d2d943e4d11c02c44afde
Gyazo
Gyazo


@LordLancer @Zone Based off of everything I've given SO far, and I haven't finished... Auzric, Jack, Bailey, and Blocky should be placed on Trial and moderators should either revoke their ability to vote or be replaced because the system was clearly made for voting power and those that are a part of it were clearly biased as proven above.
Auzric is an inefficient council member, he halts progress, messes around with the discord often, breaks the rules on a constant basis to cross lines, has threatened malicious actions and undermines people who can not defend themselves in the SCC. Auzric has broken more rules than anyone banned and is guilty of doxing on multiple occasions to which he can admit to. He has conspired with Mikey before in threats to DDoS Muffin which Mikey used to undermine the SCC council - rightfully so. Auzric is guilty of conspiring, circumvention, abuse of power in a massive amount, illegitimate voting, ambition of power (through voting power).

Gbronzed has lied to the public on many different occasions. He quit roblox and undermined the SCC with those he has talked to. He is biased towards his friends (as proven with the incident with Joe and Tristan) and has unbanned Tristan without the council's say which was abusing his power. In my trial, he has lied a multitude of times to sway people to his side. All council members can indeed confirm that you do NOT need to vote to ban a regular individual (as Jack said I abused my power by banning when that is something legal). I then exposed him by saying he banned HorridZeus without a trial for talking in war declarations and he was banned for a long time. Jack then proceeded to lie that he asked the Council first, which is completely false - he was banned with no reason given.
In spite, Sabrina was also re-banned even though her punishment was a week. Jack lied to ATD and the public by saying I never talked about the situation with Sabrina and everyone - which is completely false as you council members can clearly view.
This was a lie:
https://gyazo.com/43d0bb915e734619cd7377de7767f885
Gyazo
Gyazo


This is impossible unless Dyno takes the audit log hit because when I searched Dyno, it was Jack that banned him - https://gyazo.com/59bd0005e328490950189b59b33aaa6e
Gyazo
Gyazo


In Blocky's thing, I did question people's morals and said that some of them were pathetic, but that was not only months ago, but that was also just a fun conversation and had nothing to provide for the vote: https://gyazo.com/005db911f36deb0a2e41639e69a4c11d
Gyazo
Gyazo


By these means, I was removed for being "harsh with the staff" and nothing else.
Meanwhile, I've proven multiple council members guilty of making a farce of the justice system and being guilty of illegitimate voting.


[unrevealed]


As for Blocky, his actions have proven to be ambitious and the comment earlier posted proved his intentions which were also proven through Blocky's FULL actions. (referring to this: https://gyazo.com/60aa5c0678d406d72c62d9ca1eb3ec19 )
Gyazo
Gyazo


Auz and Blocky were both ambitious with removing council members. Jack and Bailey never admitted to it but they were quite clearly affiliated with it based off of the proof I provided.
I confirmed my suspicions with Blocky long ago, but I was able to publicly prove that his goal was not to benefit the community, but to make the council vulnerable. He worried more about the council's power than the actual benefit of the community which ties in with what was mentioned - https://gyazo.com/ef7abc2ebff2b7319551e10916d052b9
Gyazo
Gyazo


Auz and Blocky in the council chat also both alluded to giving moderators/committee the power to SPECIFICALLY "vote off council members" as a first request. That was clearly ambitious and you two could potentially prove that if you were able to release council logs.
If you REALLY need more, then I can gather much more information. I'm a bit exhausted and this should be more than enough to expose them.
LordLancer - Yesterday at 12:07 PM
Why didn't either of you argue against the vote to allow the discussion of drugs in #general
Lametta - Yesterday at 12:08 PM
I did.
It was passed immediately. I couldn't do anything more. They had majority vote.
In fact I was the only one that did.
- Allowing that is illegal
- The votes counted were illegitimate

They abused their power in forming together to bypass the LAW which I said I would get them for.
I said I'd continue the discussion when you returned.
also make sure the public can see auzric's trial
Also, those unaffiliated with their group - https://gyazo.com/59b72cc67f1ac464630c13791aa41ec4 (give me a moment)
Gyazo
Gyazo


oh, before I gather more - to note, I'm gathering the opinions of those who didn't get the chance to vote properly. I already confronted Mudi, Kam, and Zelv as mentioned above.
Unfortunately I can't see mod votes anymore, but only those involved in their little group with-held information as provided above. :wink:
Zone - Yesterday at 3:07 PM
This looks fun
Zone - Yesterday at 4:14 PM
So what’s the deal with auzric’s trial thing
Lametta - Yesterday at 4:16 PM
idk yet i cant even read message history