/SciPill/

First of all, let me make it clear, I'm not a Scientologist. Neither is my purpose with /SciPill/ i to suggest that you should get involved with Scientology, you probably shouldn't.

My point here is that (((their))) plans extend to every corner of the Earth. There is nothing they won't corrupt to suit (((their))) aims. If you are interested in Scientology specifically, all of Hubbard’s materials are available freely online; never pay for them.

So, having said that, here’s the red pill: there is are two truths in Scientology that (((they))) are trying hard to obliterate. First is the general attitude it seeks to instil in its followers; the second are some of its high-level “spiritual exercises”.

Firstly, Scientology's teachings and culture are highly individualistic and human-positive.

They place the individual at the center of the relative universe, they're highly anti-globalist and anti-psychiatry, while placing importance on personal responsibility and personal ethics.

By human-positive I mean they teach that life is worth living, that people are generally good and creative, that you have the right to exist, and that even though sometimes you may seem insignificant you are truly more powerful than you can imagine, all on your own.

Put simply, Scientology is anti-everything (((they))) are trying to push. (((They))) want complete control and will corrupt your very will to live to get there. Look around you at the culture: being “damaged” and psudo-suicidal is what all the memes are about these days. Don’t fall for it – life IS worth living, and YOU have power beyond your current knowledge.

L. Ron Hubbard, naming (((them))) in 1967:

>"Our enemies are less than twelve men. They are members of the Bank of England and other higher financial circles. They own and control newspaper chains and they, oddly enough, run all the mental health groups in the world that had sprung up. Now these chaps are very interesting fellows, they have fantastically corrupt backgrounds, illegitimate children, government graft - a very unsavory lot - and they apparently sometime in the very distant past had determined upon a course of action. Being in control of most of the gold supplies on the planet, they entered on a programme of bringing every government to bankruptcy and under their thumb, so that no government would be able to act politically without their permission."

He realized the end goal (and what we're seeing today with faux communism vs. faux capitalism) is (((them))) having total ownership and control.

>"Communism, far different from the hope of Marx, is the tool of the rich and powerful to seize everything in sight, and pay no wages. It is the final answer to capitalism, not its opponent. Socialisms in different costumes all tend to the same end product—total ownership by the State."
>"What you are observing, apparently, in our modern world, is an obscuring of actual economics to the somewhat ignoble end of taking everything away from everyone but the State. The State can then be a chosen few who own all. Capitalism, communism and socialism all wind up with man in the same situation—owned body and soul by the State."
>"So if you are confused by “economic statements” by a few chosen mouthpieces of the intended few who will be the State, realize it is not the subject itself but the intentional misuse of the subject which is causing the trouble."
>"Since all roads—capitalism, socialism, communism—all lead to the same total ownership, none of them is in actual fact in conflict. Only those several groups who each want to own everything are in conflict—and none of them is worthy of support."
- Economics, 1966.

(((They))) have ensured that (((their))) plans can be carried out no matter what political or economic system is in place, and the key to it is "mental health".

Of course, there are legitimate mental illnesses, but the boundaries of the mental health professions grow by the day. They admit this, google "concept creep in psychology".

Bit by bit, psychology, while often bringing us good things, has carefully crafted an ever-shrinking definition of "normal and acceptable" behavior that conforms directly with (((their))) needs, e.g. see: bugmen.

Realizing this connection between (((their))) forms of control at the time, LRH then builds the largest anti-(((psychiatry))) charity in the world, CCHR.

>"A psychiatrist today has the power to (1) take a fancy to a woman (2) lead her to take wild treatment as a joke (3) drug and shock her to temporary insanity (4) incarnate [sic] her (5) use her sexually (6) sterilise her to prevent conception (7) kill her by a brain operation to prevent disclosure. And all with no fear of reprisal. Yet it is rape and murder… We want at least one bad mark on every psychiatrist in England, a murder, an assault, or a rape or more than one… This is Project Psychiatry. We will remove them."
- L. Ron Hubbard, Sec ED, Office of LRH, Confidential, 22 February 1966, "Project Psychiatry"

>"The names and connections, at this time, of the bitterly opposing enemy are:  1. Psychiatry and psychology (not medicine).  2. The heads of news media who are also directors of psychiatric front groups.  3. A few key political figures in the fields of "mental health" and education.  4. A decline of monetary stability caused by the current planning of bankers who are also directors of psychiatric front organizations [that] would make us unable to function."
- L. Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter, 16 February 1969, "TARGETS, DEFENSE"

As an aside, this is why (((they))) only want you to focus on Jews in the holocaust. Almost everyone else who was sent to the concentration camps was sent there under justification by psychiatrists.

LRH struck a massive blow when he was among the first to expose the "Alaska Mental Health Enabling Act", a Democrat "mental health" enslavement bill that would ensure anyone could be committed to a mental asylum for any reason.

Just listen to this from the very first paragraph of its wiki page:

>"[The bill] became the focus of a major political controversy after opponents nicknamed it the "Siberia Bill" and denounced it as being part of a communist plot to hospitalize and brainwash Americans. Campaigners asserted that it was part of an international Jewish, Roman Catholic or psychiatric conspiracy intended to establish United Nations-run concentration camps in the United States.

A secondary component to this public assault on (((them))) by Scientology is their interest in Hollywood. Think about it – Scientology is desperate to be taken seriously as a religion – focusing on celebrities and Hollywood is damaging to that image – so why do they do it?

Put the dots together – where are (((their))) two biggest hives: psychology and Hollywood. By breaking apart (((their))) hold on Hollywood they achieve two things: giving high level celebrities a safe place to go to where they can vent about the shadow cabal, and simultaneously reduce the amount of (((their))) content being produced there.

But this is all just the "public game", behind closed doors there is a targeted effort by the CIA to subvert and modify the teaching of Scientology.

Why? Because some of the procedures Scientologists take part in seem to produce reliable remote viewing (RV) abilities, and they didn't want Joe Public or the Russians to have access.

Sounds unbelievable until you Google the two men essentially running StarGate / GRILL FLAME (the CIA's RV operations): Hal Puthoff and Ingo Swann. Both reached the level of OT VII in Scientology and worked with the CIA to train remote viewers using Scientology.

This is part of the reason Scientology was forced to rebrand itself from "science" to "religion"; to take advantage of first amendment protections.

Unfortunately, it didn't work and Scientology was taken over by the CIA in the 70's. Both the current leader, David Miscavige, and the church's president, Heber Jentsch, are named as known CIA agents (cryptome DOT org/cia-2619 DOT htm).

Miscavige, a well-documented sociopath and (((suitable candidate)) to lead an organization; and Jentsch, controller of much of Hubbard’s estate, were offered deals by the CIA to hand over all of Hubbard’s relevant material to (((their))) aims and the RV operations and then expunge them from the church, in exchange for cushy multi-millionaire lifestyles as leaders of a now subverted cult.

Miscavige runs a separate organization called RTC, from which he runs the church, ordering re-write after re-write of Hubbard’s books (see: Scientology Basics event 2007).

But there's also a second, much less talked about organization that run Scientology, incorporated after Hubbard's death, called CST or the "Church of Spiritual Technology". Despite Scientology supposedly being a cult that wants to covert the planet, CST is staffed by people called "Special Directors", most of which are (((lawyers))), but none of whom are Scientologists. One of its founders was Meade Emory, former Assistant to the Commissioner of IRS.

Why would that be? Why would a church that, according to defectors, routinely expels people for not being "good scientologists" allow itself to be controlled by a group of non-scientologists? Maybe so (((they))) can keep an eye on people who research or take part in Scientology, and make sure nobody puts the actual useful parts into practice. This is why they're terrified of Scientology splinter groups, like the FreeZone, breaking off from the main church; they don't want any of the original, unedited material getting out of their control. Hence why CST's non-scientologists own all the copyrights to the scientology "scripture" and not the incorporated "Church of Scientology International", so they can stop people outside the church using the materials.

Following the take over the purge began and the people LRH named as his successors were exiled. The books and tapes that form the teachings of Scientology were edited and republished - notice that early editions have "by L. Ron Hubbard" on the cover and inside copyright notice, while new editions say, "Based on writings by L. Ron Hubbard." and "(C) LRH Library" inside.

In 2007 this re-write was complete, curiously coinciding with the only IRL protest /b/ has successfully pulled off. Ask yourself how that was organized, look at the "anonymous" of today (i.e. SJW mouthpiece), and consider (((Who))) could have been behind that push to eradicate Scientology from the earth, and why a flurry of "documentaries" and TV have suddenly popped up - first subvert, then destroy - it’s got (((their))) fingerprints all over it.

Yes, Scientology has done bad things, but relatively minor compared to what goes on in the rest of the world. If it’s just a tiny fringe religion, why is it getting a disproportionate level of attention, particularly from sectors controlled by (((them)))?


=======

TL;DR: Take personal responsibility and person ethics seriously; never allow normal to be defined by (((them))). Recognize, ridicule, and rescind (((their))) schemes.

While it is about the specific example of scientology, the idea behind it isn't. its to highlight how the attack on scientology reveals the three key areas of (((their))) plan.

First is that this is a system with an aim of complete control; complete in its fullest sense.

Second is the idea that the key mechanism of that control is the idea behind psychology (psyche - ology literally translated is the study of the soul) - they've co-opted certain fundamental assumptions about human nature and restricted them into the box of psychology in the same way the the soul has been shrunk into the mind.

Third is that you, plain old you, are powerful beyond imagination, and complete control requires complete suppression of that idea.