Lesta

22 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-10-28 1100 +Terran Downvale

Oct 27th, 2016
135
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.17 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-10-28 1100 +Terran Downvale
  2. https://plus.google.com/112413489582307671009/posts/7kJUFeqm3Go
  3. https://pastebin.com/zen3dGnr
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Terran Downvale __ But it's not at all like that! First of all - you don't just accept the pure numbers as they were written in an article. *YOU ALSO ADD THEM UP to get OTHER numbers you want*!
  7.  
  8. That's like taking an English word and making an anagram out of it and treating it as though that anagrammed word was really the one used in the article!
  9.  
  10. __
  11.  
  12. There are how many words in the English language that are used in news articles? Let us pretend that overall there's a working vocabulary of NINE THOUSAND English words. There are how many numbers that can be broken down to "nutty numbers"? *Just NINE*!!!
  13.  
  14. Not only are there just nine numbers... *there are MANY WAYS to FORM those nine numbers*!
  15.  
  16. That's because 16 can also mean "7" by way of "1 + 6 = 7".
  17.  
  18. That's because 358 can also mean "7" by way of "3 + 5 + 8 = 16 = 1+6 = 7".
  19.  
  20. >>> *Come on Terran - this is NOT legitimate*. <<<
  21.  
  22. There are 230 MILLION search results for the number "3" in Google News.
  23.  
  24. >>> *There are 354 MILLION search results for the number "33" in Google News*. <<<
  25.  
  26. THREE HUNDRED AND FIFTY FOUR! (354 = 12 = 3!)
  27.  
  28. Yet the word "BOMB" yields just 10 MILLION results. But don't we hear about bombs all the time?! ("BOMBS" = 4.2 million results.)
  29.  
  30. Yet the word "TERROR" yields just 26 MILLION results. Yet don't we hear about "terror" all the time?
  31.  
  32. We hear about "bomb" and "bombs" and "terror" ALL THE TIME yet by comparison to numbers they are mentioned RARELY!
  33.  
  34. The English word "BUT" yields 305 MILLION results!
  35.  
  36. >>> *The f_kcing number "33" is MORE COMMON than the English word "BUT"*. <<<
  37.  
  38.  
  39. You are ALWAYS going to FIND what you are LOOKING for. *ALWAYS*.
  40.  
  41.  
  42. Each article has TONS of numbers for you to latch onto. Each article has a date - it typically has people's ages. It typically includes other numbers to describe how often something happened.
  43.  
  44. *And if they aren't the specific number you want - you can always do some "nutty math" to "add them up" and get the number you want*!
  45.  
  46. 12 = 1 + 2 = 3... there! You got a "3" from a "12"!
  47.  
  48. *This is INSANITY*.
  49.  
  50. This has NOTHING to do with true things for true reasons.
  51.  
  52. You are using the nutty numbers as a way to convince yourself of whatever it is you want or require to be true. *Everything is being done in HINDSIGHT*. It is being done in REVERSE.
  53.  
  54. The human mind is comfortable at figuring things out in HINDSIGHT. The human mind excels at that. The nutty numbers is a thinking "OCD" that is being used to ruin good minds.
  55.  
  56. You are saying: "If some words are relevant and so why not also some numbers?" - *of course WORDS can be*. Because when we focus on those WORDS (in terms of event priming motifs) *we can make predictions about the future*.
  57.  
  58. Such as seeing people get run over in multiple sources has led to the "ISS" tank execution and how about that alleged "French Bastille Day Terror Attack" just a few months ago?!
  59.  
  60. It is ONLY by focusing on things that have GENUINE meaning and GENUINE connections that you can arrive at GENUINE expectations about the future.
  61.  
  62. But what predictions about the future does repeatedly seeing "14" in news article give? What predictions does "14 = 1 + 4 = 5" yield?
  63.  
  64. *What predictions do the "nutty numbers" give*?
  65.  
  66. They give none. They CAN give none.
  67.  
  68. The nutty numbers are an "OCD" that has been encouraged in you and others to f_kc with your mind and lead you astray. This is a "psy-op" like the "flat Earth" only this one appeals to you whereas the "flat Earth" didn't.
  69.  
  70. >>>>> I am *imploring* you to trust my judgment on this. <<<<<
  71.  
  72.  
  73. ______________________________________________________________
  74. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  75.  
  76. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  77. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
  78.  
  79. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  80. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  81.  
  82. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  83. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  84.  
  85. Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
  86. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  87.  
  88. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  89. What exists - exists to always exist.
  90. As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment