Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- ********************
- V For Vendetta Hd Full Movie Download
- http://urllio.com/r0lgp
- (Copy & Paste link)
- ********************
- In a future British tyranny, a shadowy freedom fighter, known only by the alias of "V", plots to overthrow it with the help of a young woman.
- In the not too distant future, Britain is filled with torture cells, unfair punishments, prejudice against minorities. However in the midst of all this chaos, one man known only by the name V dares to stand up to the government and is labeled as a terrorist. One night V rescues a mild young woman called Evey Hammond and an unlikely bond between the two emerges which results with Evey becoming Vs ally. But though V may be charismatic and have a passion for justice he also is bitter and has his own personal hatred of the government for something they did to him long ago. As November the 5th, the day V says he and those who will follow him will stand up to the government once and for all approaches, Detective Finch becomes more and more determined to uncover the truth about V, however his search leads him to ask to question whether or not he is on the right side.
- V for Vendetta is most definitely one of the best movies I have ever seen. I like not only because of the interesting plot and suspense, violence, (and did i mention NATALIE PORTMAN?) but because it gets the cogs of the brain working a little bit. it makes you think that these exact same things happening in the movie could happen in the near future. it explores the rise of communism/socialism and it explores the concept of when people overcome fear and fear of death what they are capable of. I like the idea that V made everyone want to stand against the government and they all became V. I was somewhat disappointed in the ending. call me a sap but i would have like to seen Evey and V live on after the explosion of parliament but sadly V dies. (sorry if i ruined the movie). I would have like to seen V's and Evey past more explored as well as the virus and experiments that went on, but i know there is only some much u can put in a movie. The whole virus thing kind of reminds me of 28 days later, except the virus didn't turn you into a flesh loving zombie in this movie, and unlike in 28 days later the government didn't create the virus and then make people pay for the cure. Besides i don't like 28 days later that much.
- *definite spoilers*<br/><br/>I rented "V" because its rating is above an 8 here at IMDb, and these ratings are usually reliable. Not this time. This movie was unbearable at times. The politics were awful. I really needed Hugo Weaving to take off that mask, I wanted to see a human being. Instead we're looking at a psycho clown terrorist for 2 hours, and it's hard to understand what he's saying because his voice is muffled. Although I appreciated some of the fancy English dialogue he spouts off. Natalie Portman was good, but there's always been a soft spot in my heart for her ever since her great performance in "The Professional" when she was a cute little girl. She's the only saving grace of this movie, she brings some humanity to the otherwise cold, dark, bleak proceedings.<br/><br/>So his plan is to blow up the English Parliament, and he does. And everyone is happy. Why? Will a new government be formed now? Of who? People, that's who. And those people will run for office, and need a new building to house government proceedings. And these people will then be known as the "nasty government". And then everyone will start to hate them to, and then blow up their building. Blowing up buildings is not the answer, but the filmmakers appear to be sympathetic to this "idea". They appear to support terrorism.<br/><br/>America and the United Kingdom are not perfect obviously. But they have created the best form of government in the history of civilization, where the people vote and elect who we want to govern us. Fascism is not right around the corner, as much as Hollywood seems to want it to be. Collectively we're too advanced for that. No one is going to let it happen. George Bush? Please, he isn't smart enough for that. And even if he is, guess what, he's gone in a year. In America, we elect our government officials, if we elect a fascist, then i guess that's what the people wanted. If we elect a socialist...etc.<br/><br/>More insulting, the one book in the world most associated with terrorism, is the Koran, yet the filmmakers also seem to like that book. What a joke. And people think this movie is profound? Grow up. It's an insult. Make a movie about real terrorists, not Shakespearean English gentleman who sip tea if they weren't wearing a mask.<br/><br/>So, while interesting and entertaining at times, and Natalie Portman's lovely presence, "V's" politics make it an insult to anyone who understands what Democracy is.
- Mostly, it's content to remain a compelling, visually striking political mystery with some big ideas woven into it--subversive notions about integrity, liberty, and political change.
- movie, it doesn't occur either in Christopher Marlowe's Faustus or Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's Faust but in fact was a motto of the 20th century occultist Aleister Crowley, who likely had as much of a fascination with Johann Georg Faust as Marlowe and Goethe yet isn't known for explicitly writing about Faust in correlation with the motto. It could be speculated that V was in possession of an unpublished and furthermore esoteric work of art of some kind that linked these, but for Evey's sake, V's attribution was dubious, since she being an ordinary civilian would have no awareness of the hypothetical artifact. No one knows as it is not stated in either the movie or the graphic novel. Furthermore, V says that he lost his memory while at Larkhill, so during the time frame of the movie's events, even he didn't know why he had been sent there. It's only stated that he was an "undesirable", which could mean that he was not heterosexual, a non-Christian (perhaps not the right denomination of Christian), that he had possessions that were deemed offensive, that he spoke out against the political regime, or that he was/did anything else the totalitarian government prohibited/feared. In an interview, Hugo Weaving did with IndieLondon, he offered the following:<br/><br/>You understand that he's been tortured and physically abused and that's what has created him. But at the same time the reason he was imprisoned in the first place was, I would suggest, because he was some kind of political activist. And I think he was probably an actor so he has very strong opinions.<br/><br/>The original graphic novel's Larkhill was based loosely off of Hitler's concentration camps and the Nazi atrocities, and it is left open whether V is a member of a racial minority, is homosexual, or that he was taken for his political views. However, it's possible that he was not being specifically punished, seeing as he was placed in a group that was almost certain to be unceremoniously disposed of. A man who can fashion explosives and destroy a detention facility in which he's being held captive is likely to make authoritarians nervous wherever he goes.<br/><br/>Throughout the film, V exhibits an intricate knowledge of the workings of the Norsefire regime, and it's possible that he knew these things before being shipped off to Larkhill, thus it wouldn't be unreasonable to suspect that he was a some kind of strategic agent of the executive branch, perhaps the Sutler's administration or ones prior. He could have been a serviceman, a commissioned officer or a covert operative. This ties in with the symbolism of him impersonating William Rookwood, along with the symbolism in the unmasking of Dietrich's parody V revealing a parody duplicate of Dietrich's parody Sutler. And furthermore, the number five pops up in consideration of the concept of a fifth column emerging within Sutler's dictatorship. However, for this to work, it would mean that Sutler's loyal forces were unaware of the extent of the security clearance held by the man who would become V, for they surely would have killed him instead of imprisoning him, in order to maintain their party/state secrets. Nothing in the movie suggests that the transition from the previous administration to Sutler's was not smooth, but there is no telling how many state employees were sloppily fired and not murdered or executed. V and the other prisoners were injected with a virus that was later used at St. Mary's, Three Waters (water treatment plant), and a London tube station. More specifically, the Larkhill prisoners were the "lab rats" in Norsefire's experiments while the party was attempting to develop a super-bioweapon. There is an implication that the St. Mary's virus came from the blood of V himself, since he was the trial which gave the coroner hope and since he was the only subject who survived the Larkhill explosion. This would provide another reason for his vendetta against the government, since he felt partially responsible for the virus. This is seemingly contradicted by the diary of Delia Surridge, who claims that all her work was destroyed in the explosion at Larkhill; however, she might have been writing that as merely an assumption, as she afterwards distanced herself from the project and might well not have known if any data had survived. During the "flashback" scene it was rather definitively implied that everybody who was injected died—except for V. Thus, we may assume that for whatever reason he is unique, or at the very least an extremely rare specimen in some biological or physiological sense, and that most people would not develop as he did—or else Larkhill would have been overrun by V-type super-people. The movie does seem to imply V is given some sort of superhuman ability by the experimentation at Larkhill, as Delia's diary says: "the mutations seem to have triggered the abnormal development of basic kinesthesia and reflexes." Those responsible for Three Waters and St. Mary's also came out with a miracle vaccine for the virus that made them very wealthy and allowed them to be saviors in a time of fear and utter chaos. It would stand to reason that this vaccine would be developed from V's blood, as he was the only one able to resist the virus. V's role in the viral attacks would then be as the originator of the vaccine. This would explain how V knew of the history of the virus and vaccine that he relates to Finch and Dominic. The graphic novel merely implies that the prisoners were experimented on with no real purpose, like the Nazis with Jews in World War II. The super-soldier story line is the Wachowskis take on the purpose of the experimentation. This is explained in an expanded voiceover of Delia Surridge's (the coroner that V killed) journal, which exists in the original script but was cut much shorter for the final product. While at Larkhill, V was allowed to tend the garden there, for which he had access to chemical supplies, grease solvents, ammonia, and fertilizer. He used those to produce napalm and mustard gas.There are two theories. (1) The doctor is talking metaphorically, i.e. she couldn't see his eyes because of the fire but knew he was looking at her. Throughout the movie, V can be seen reading books, watching movies, and visually noticing people. (2) Yes, he is blind. You can clearly see his face around his eyes is caved in and completely black on the close up, with no flames distorting your view, and it can be assumed that his enhanced kinesthesia is the way he views the world now, with no need for visual perception. This would, of course, necessitate an expanded definition of the the meaning of the term 'kinesthesia." a5c7b9f00b
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement
