When you argue that there is no fundamental difference between the races, be reminded that this was derived from your shitty 18th century humanist philosophers based on nothing but 'muh magickal skydaddy' and you have no more intellectual integrity than a young creationist arguing the Earth is 6000 years old.

>no, it is totally plausible for the chaos of nature to produce equality in a trait humans will eventually decide is important and eventually produce one specific test to kinda-sorta proxy

Oh shit I'm sorry I didn't realize I live in some Leibnizien "best of every possible world" reality where divine providence took take to indulge our modern day egalitarianism.

God truly is merciful. He has made the different shade of green possible so that our eyes could find repose in them, and man equal to one another in qualities so as to prevent injustices.

>The phrase "the best of all possible worlds" (French: le meilleur des mondes possibles; German: Die beste aller möglichen Welten) was coined by the German polymath Gottfried Leibniz in his 1710 work Essais de Théodicée sur la bonté de Dieu, la liberté de l'homme et l'origine du mal (Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil). The claim that the actual world is the best of all possible worlds is the central argument in Leibniz's theodicy, or his attempt to solve the problem of evil.