Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- 5 TRANSLATIONS OF PPP 25-26 FBI DOCUMENT DUMP CURSIVE
- --> Notes
- * seem to be of a telephone conversation
- * mixture of print & cursive, using shorthand and acronyms
- * ___ used for undecipherable
- * c___in used for undeciprehable letters within word
- * word(?) used for unsure tranlsation of word
- =========== anon ===============
- Page 25 Finders Handwritten Notes Deciphered by Anon
- 3/27/94 Confidential Classification
- Referred is CIA Langley Office of Gen Counsel
- retired 3 April 1992
- In Feb 1987 US Acting Chief Special Activities Division Office of Security
- Sector handled __of CIA employees,media leaks and CI work internal INVESTIGATIONS - allegations of CIA employee involvement etc.
- Had regular interface w/ FBI USDS DIA
- Requests for informants (like MPD’s) was referred to his section
- Was there from 82 to 88, this one call is only one from MPD
- ___
- Recalls but 2 connections to CIA & Finders
- 1) REDACTED worked for Agency in 60's
- Was some computer tray at Future Enterprises
- his attempt at this was this failure Entry was same one MPD to Finders. Does not reveal how the annexation was made instrumental connections Assumption is low level, unclassified intro computer trng (training)
- Page 26 Finders Handwritten Notes Deciphered by Anon
- not sure how connection was made.
- Could have been the address – could have learned about
- Future Ent link to Finders thru newspaper
- Not clear how more came up
- --nothing located on record checks on “Finders”
- in ST & DDO records.
- Thinks mg gone down to MPD to discuss this
- --was at least one phone conv.
- --Thinks he provided info on REDACTED And that
- Future Ent. may being used by CIA for comput.TRNG
- No idea how MPD came to idea conclusion of Steppen on toes
- Does not recall discussion travel of REDACTED, does not recall if
- CIA ever knew, if retravelled, but possibly.
- --Finders case in 1987 was in Media, mentioned CIA
- Thinks perhaps he saw article in paper ran some
- traces to see if Agency was involved
- --No Agency Affiliate or REDACTED
- were looked at them. MPD telephoned SLU SRT Druisl
- was referred to him for response. SGt SPT Druis
- one tele conv. Followed by visit to MPD
- un first about involved. Left MPD with positive
- feeling. MPD officer seemed logical.
- Never attempted to influence or stop ILLEIGIBLE
- Finders def not CIA front
- ==========anon=============
- TRANSLATION OF CURSIVE PP 25-26
- pp 25
- ___ in CIA Langley, Office of ___ ___
- retired 3 April 1992
- In Feb 1987 US Acting Chief Special Activities Division Office of Sea_ _ _
- ___ handled imper___ion of CIA employees,media leaks and CI work internal INVESTIGATIONS - allegations of CIA employee involvement etc.
- Had regular in___ce w/ FBI USDS DIA
- Request for informants (like MPD's) was referred to his section not used for MPD to call section
- _s there from 82 to 88, this are call in ___ or from MPD
- Really but 2 connections to CIA & Finders
- 1) REDACTED worked for Agency in 60's
- 2) Was some computer tray at Future Enterprises
- his attempt at this as this failure Entry as same one MPD looked to Finders. Does not reveal how the annexation was made instrumental connections Assumption is low level, unclassified intro computer trng (training)
- page 26
- Not sure how connect was made
- could have been the address, could have learned about Future Ent back to Finders through newspaper
- not _ show more cover up
- -Nothing shown in records checks on "Finders" in SI & DDO records
- Think ___ gone down to MPD to deliver this
- -was at least one phone conv(ersation)
- -Thinks he provided info on REDACTED tip that Future Entp (Enterprises) was being used by CIA for computer trng (training).
- No idea how MPD came to idea ___ of stepping on top
- Does not recall diverse travel of REDACTED. Does not recall if CIA even knew he travelled, but possible.
- -Finders cam in 1987 was in media, mentioned CIA
- Thinks perhaps he saw article if paper ran some traces to see if Agency was somewhat involved.
- -No Agency affiliate or REDACTED will look at this. MPD telephoned ___SPT DIUISL he referred to him for response by ___ SPT DIUISL
- One telephone conv(ersation) followed by a visit to MPD was fmr(former) client involvement. Left MPD with positive feeling. MPD offer seemed logical.
- ---new eyes here - this line looks different from other translations:
- >was fmr(former) client involvement.
- up front about involvment
- pls check pg 26 in FBI docs
- ------resume reconciled translation
- Left MPD with positive feeling. MPD offer seemed logical.
- New attorney to ___ or stop invest(igation)
- Finders def(initely) not a CIA front
- =============anon===============
- TRANSLATION OF CURSIVE PP 25-26
- pp 25
- ___ in CIA Langley, Office of ___ ___
- retired 3 April 1992
- In Feb 1987 US Acting Chief Special Activities Division Office of Sea_ _ _
- ___ handled imper___ion of CIA employees,media leaks and CI work internal INVESTIGATIONS - allegations of CIA employee involvement etc.
- Had regular in___ce w/ FBI USDS DIA
- Request for informants (like MPD's) was referred to his section not used for MPD to call section
- _s there from 82 to 88, this are call in ___ or from MPD
- Really but 2 connections to CIA & Finders
- 1) REDACTED worked for Agency in 60's
- 2) Was some computer tray at Future Enterprises
- his attempt at this as this failure Entry as same one MPD looked to Finders. Does not reveal how the annexation was made instrumental connections Assumption is low level, unclassified intro computer trng (training)
- page 26
- Not sure how connect was made
- could have been the address, could have learned about Future Ent back to Finders thru newspaper
- not able ___ more cover up
- -Nothing docket(?) on records checks on "Finders" __ ST & DDO records
- Think __ gone down to MPD to ____ this
- -us at least one phone conv(ersation)
- -Thinks he provided info on REDACTED ___ that Future Entp (Enterprises) was being used by cIA for computer trng (training).
- No odea how MPD came to idea ___ of stopping(?) top(?)
- Does not recall ___ travel of REDACTED. Does not recall if CIA even knew he travelled, but possible.
- -Finders cam in 1987 his __ media mentored CIA
- Thinks perhaps he saw article if paper ran some traces to see if Agency has to be involved.
- -No Agency affiliate or REDACTED were look at them. MPD telphoned ___SPT DIUSL he referred to him for response by S__ DIUISL
- One telephone conv(ersation) followed by a visit to MPD ___ ___ about involvement. Left MPD with positive feeling. MPD offer seemed logical.
- New attorney to __fh )) or stop ___.
- Finders def not a CIA front
- ==========anon===============
- TRANSLATION OF CURSIVE PP 25-26
- pp 25
- Referred is CIA Langley Office of Gen Counsel
- retired 3 April 1992
- In Feb 1987 US Acting Chief Special Activities Division Office of Security
- Sector handled __of CIA employees,media leaks and CI work internal INVESTIGATIONS - allegations of CIA employee involvement etc.
- Had regular interface w/ FBI USDS DIA
- Request for informants (like MPD's) was referred to his section was used for MPD to call section
- Was there from 82 to 88, this was call in ___ from MPD
- Recalls but 2 connections to CIA & Finders
- 1) REDACTED worked for Agency in 60's
- 2) Was some computer tray at Future Enterprises
- his attempt at this was this failure Entry was same one MPD to Finders. Does not reveal how the annexation was made instrumental connections Assumption is low level, unclassified intro computer trng (training)
- page 26
- Not sure how connect was made
- could have been the address, could have learned about Future Ent back to Finders through newspaper
- not _ shown cover up
- -Nothing shown in records checks on "Finders" in SI & DDO records
- Think was gone down to MPD to deliver this
- -was at least one phone conv(ersation)
- -Thinks he provided info on REDACTED tap that Future Entp (Enterprises) was being used by cIA for computer trng (training).
- No idea how MPD came to idea ___ of stepping on top
- Does not recall diverse travel of REDACTED. Does not recall if CIA even knew he travelled, but possible.
- -Finders cam in 1987 was in media, mentioned CIA
- Thinks perhaps he saw article if paper ran some traces to see if Agency was somewhat involved.
- -No Agency affiliate or REDACTED will look at this. MPD telphoned ___SPT DIUISL he referred to him for response by ___ SPT DIUISL
- One telephone conv(ersation) followed by a visit to MPD was fmr(former) client involvement. Left MPD with positive feeling. MPD offer seemed logical.
- New attorney to ___ or stop invest(igation)
- Finders def not a CIA front
- ==========anon===============
- p25
- 3/27/94 Confidential Classification
- Referred is CIA Langley Office of Gen Counsel
- retired 3 April 1992
- In Feb 1987 US Acting Chief Special Activities Division Office of Security
- Sector handled __of CIA employees,media leaks and CI work internal INVESTIGATIONS - allegations of CIA employee involvement etc.
- Had regular interface w/ FBI USDS DIA
- Requests for informants (like MPD’s) was referred to his section
- Was there from 82 to 88, this one call is only one from MPD
- Recalls but 2 connections to CIA & Finders
- 1) REDACTED worked for Agency in 60's
- Was some computer tray at Future Enterprises
- his attempt at this was this failure Entry was same one MPD to Finders. Does not reveal how the annexation was made instrumental connections Assumption is low level, unclassified intro computer trng (training)
- page 26
- Not sure how connect was made
- could have been the address, could have learned about Future Ent back to Finders through newspaper
- not _ show more cover up
- -Nothing shown in records checks on "Finders" in SI & DDO records
- Think ___ gone down to MPD to deliver this
- -was at least one phone conv(ersation)
- -Thinks he provided info on REDACTED tip that Future Entp (Enterprises) was being used by CIA for computer trng (training).
- No idea how MPD came to idea ___ of stepping on top
- Does not recall diverse travel of REDACTED. Does not recall if CIA even knew he travelled, but possible.
- -Finders cam in 1987 was in media, mentioned CIA
- Thinks perhaps he saw article if paper ran some traces to see if Agency was somewhat involved.
- -No Agency affiliate or REDACTED will look at this. MPD telephoned ___SPT DIUISL he referred to him for response by ___ SPT DIUISL
- One telephone conv(ersation) followed by a visit to MPD was fmr(former) client involvement. Left MPD with positive feeling. MPD offer seemed logical.
- ---new eyes here - this line looks different from other translations:
- >was fmr(former) client involvement.
- up front about involvment
- pls check pg 26 in FBI docs
- ------resume reconciled translation
- Left MPD with positive feeling. MPD offer seemed logical.
- New attorney to ___ or stop invest(igation)
- Finders def(initely) not a CIA front
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement