Nothing he said had any backing given by him, just throwing stuff out, yet pretends he can talk down to anyone (and calls others condescending cunts). All he had to say was about how things sound or what his observations were. I assume he won't like people mocking how he sounds or how they observe him.

He doesnt like bullshit but Kraut's obvious inability to even get Ryan's point about Molecular Genetics right must be a-okay. And he is parroting Kraut's denial of quantitative social science for...reasons. He even denies the uses of samples and averages at one point. And like all of Kraut's experts he seems to think we havent eliminated obvious environmental factors. It is seriously a common pattern among them.
For example, we have compared poor whites to rich blacks on the SAT for instance, which correlates highly with IQ. So even his attempt to stack or even out the deck matters very little. Just because bad environments and low IQ covary doesnt mean the environment is the only cause, people with low potential IQ rarely make good environments after all which is a confounding factor he totally discounts and relies on "his observations" as if he can see IQ rise or fall. I mean, I know Kraut is preferring the "find the genes" argument right now rather than arguing about the environment but that's just his choice to evade the debate.

Also, the IQ of the adopted white kids was not as low as the adopted black kids. I have absolutely no clue what his objections to the Minnesota study was about

Somehow I dont trust the judgement and openness of someone who blocks me for telling him he was wrong about the whole flagging ordeal (which Sargon admits to).

Also, Alternative Hypothesis has an article on child abuse. Shouldn't you guys have researched the site? This is why him not having sources on what he says matters. He doesn't show the abuse is why there is a 15 point gap, just posits it
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/09/25/child-abuse-and-racial-differences-in-crime-and-iq/