Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- ********************
- Blade II Tamil Dubbed Movie Torrent
- http://urllio.com/r0mgv
- (Copy & Paste link)
- ********************
- After the events with Deacon Frost, Blade continues to destroy as many vampires as he can. A new breed of super-vampire has appeared, which becomes an even greater threat than any evil currently out there. A group of high powered vampires, led by Nyssa and Asad request help from Blade in order to take down Nomak. Can Blade work alongside the very things he vowed to destroy?
- Blade forms an uneasy alliance with the vampire council in order to combat the Reapers, who are feeding on vampires.
- The problem with horror movie sequels nowadays is that they are so repetitive.Take the "Final Destination" movies for example.Every one of them is pretty much just a rehash of the original,only the setting differs.With "Blade II",however,that is not the case.<br/><br/>In the beginning of the film we get a recap from the previous one.People who have watched the original may find this unnecessary and a little annoying,but it didn't really bother me that much.Shortly after the recap blade finds Whistler and rescues him(I won't go into more details).At first I thought that was an enormous plot hole,but it's explained withing the first half hour.<br/><br/>The fight scenes are choreographed better and they don't use CGI as much as in in the original.When they do use CGI,it's way better than the first movie.We don't get that much character development and the main focus is on Blade and Nyssa.<br/><br/>The thing I liked the most about "Blade II" was the plot twist near the end of the film.The ending itself is much more dramatic than in the original.That said,the film doesn't quite end on a happy note,but I won't spoil it for you.<br/><br/>"Blade II" is a very well made action/horror flick and a rare case where the sequel is better than the original.
- I saw this movie not knowing what to expect, because I never had seen the first movie in the series. Within the first five minutes we get some fast paced action/fighting. This movie was what an action film should be about. It had good fighting scenes, and a semi-interesting plot to keep you satisfied between them.<br/><br/>I rate this one an 8/10
- Like the original, Blade II has superior production values and visual and special effects. Snipes and Kristofferson build on the resonance of their original portrayals.
- Blade IIis based on a vampire hunter featured in Marvel Comics. He was created by Marv Wolfman and Gene Colan. Blade's first appearance was in The Tomb of Dracula #10 (July 1973) as a supporting character. The comic book Blade was adapted for the movie by American screenwriter David Goyer. The first Blade movie, <a href="/title/tt0120611/">Blade (1998)</a>, was released in 1998, followed by Blade II. A third sequel, <a href="/title/tt0359013/">Blade: Trinity (2004)</a> followed in 2004. While it's never explicitly stated, Blade is seen with a large supply of Serum, in much smaller bottles from the first film. The amount of these he has suggests he does not need to increase his dose - Chances are, once she developed this, Karen left - either to return to a normal life or to join another group. There are a number of theories: (1) A line of dialogue from the film explains, "He shot himself and then he turned", as says Rush, the vampire Blade allows to leave as a "loose end" for showing him Whistler; (2) Director Guillermo Del Toro argued that no one saw Whistler shoot himself (in the DVD commentary), so he really didn't die in Del Toro's eyes; and (3) A deleted scene from the original Blade. When Blade and Karen were climbing out into the daylight after Blade had just blown up Deacon Frost, there was a figure in the background that appeared to be Whistler. It was hinting at him returning in a sequel, but the filmmakers decided to leave it out of the film. (Probably because they didn't know if a sequel was to happen yet.) a5c7b9f00b
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
