12 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-16 1805 +PUBLIC

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-16 1805 +PUBLIC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGufq1uoI7o&lc=z13cc5wjiubuj5dkh22btpawetqovbbhd04
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/aBGKMxacaDs
https://pastebin.com/zCrgm5xD
Jeff C; NWA; New World Agenda
__

At 8 minutes into your video *I have a question*. I hope at some point you can give your opinion (either as a reply - or mention the topic in a subsequent video). This question is specific to the Nice event but applies to most others as well. *QUESTION:* Do you think that if the footage of the truck driving through the crowd had been recorded in glorious HD (High Definition) that the "event skeptics" (i.e, "hoaxtards") would no longer be able to continue denying the event really happened? (I am referring to any kind of modern camera or phone capable of recording at 720p or better.)







Consider the brief video clip where the band is playing. Had that brief clip remained the same but instead been filmed in stunning HD quality (and not the 240p "potato cam" quality we got to see) *_do you think it would have made it impossible for honest people to deny the event as genuine?_*







Of course there will always be hoaxtards who claim everything is fake. After all - to them the Moon is a hologram and how can we be sure there are continents, anyway? (Of course - 60-mile high trees - that sh!t is totally possible and legit). But - I'm not referring to *those* obvious agents against truth such as "Peekay HIDES Truth", "Retardvids" and "HowICan'tSee TheWorld". What those people have to say does not matter to anyone who matters.







I'm talking instead about the genuine/honest "hoaxtards" who may be new to the "truther scene" and have gotten "swept up" in the craze of "event skepticism" (versus "event realism").







Do you think *good quality* - _HD quality_ - footage would make a meaningful difference? Or would it be just the "same old denial" but with HD?







Personally - I think it would make a *huge* difference. To see the same footage we saw of the Nice event (and other events) - in spectacular HD - I think would make this event *undeniable*. As it is - I can see why the worthless quality footage *wouldn't* be accepted by "event skeptics" - _even if the event were real._







I would go so far as to say that if "they" want the population to believe an event really happened then all "they" need to do is provide HD quality footage [where it exists] rather than crippling it [as over time it seems].







It's nearing the business end of 2016. I personally don't own a camera or phone that cannot record in HD. I am not sure how many more years the population can tolerate 240p quality without becoming suspicious. There might be a lot of old cameras and phones but if it were the year 2240 - and we were still being given 240p "potato cam" footage - then I think people might realise the poor video quality is *intentional*.







And so whatever the case may be - surely HD can only support the belief that these events are genuine. And that with each passing year the absence of HD is making it more self-evident - even to drooling dummies - that the footage is being intentionally crippled. But why cripple the footage if the intention is to have the population believe?! Surely HD footage can only help to lead "hoaxtards" to the conclusion that _*"not everything is a hoax".*_







That's my question and that's what I have to say on this. As I wait for a reply from you *I welcome the opinion of anyone else on this matter*.