Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Jan 16th, 2018
170
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 16.44 KB | None | 0 0
  1. [18:08] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): To touch up on a few of the issues I saw in admin chat. I was not around for a period of time due to holidays and personal related issues that were by no means permanent. Upon my return I have been busy arranging and scheduling events. Yes you should have had more training, in fact were supposed to, there were meant to be 2 classes per week. For both saber and Force powers, I was not informed you only had 4 classes, Darius informed me he was providing your training. Synade was providing some training as well, prior to that I had been doing all the training myself, thus deferred it to them in order to better expand the plot and storylines provided to the group. As for purging in-actives I gave several of them time to respond and am doing that now actually.
  2. [18:10] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): Alright.
  3. [18:12] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): Darius mentioned you were building a sim during your inactivity.
  4. [18:13] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): [2017/12/27 18:31] Darius Devareaux (darius.vayandar): hes away
  5. [2017/12/27 18:31] Darius Devareaux (darius.vayandar): he will be back once he finishes building the sim he got paid to build
  6. [18:13] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): Yes, I was hired by someone to build their sim, though that was not the only thing going on.
  7. [18:14] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): got paid 50k to build a sim for someone.
  8. [18:14] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): that was prior to holidays though.
  9. [18:18] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): I've been around the SWRP community since 2006, so I've seen or heard it all at this point. That's a reasonable offer, though I would think that a leader would step down if they knew they would be dedicating a hefty amount of time away from their responsibilities as a faction lead. I absolutely LOATHE ooc chat with a passion as it typically spurs drama. I've kept my opinions regarding the way the Inquisitorious has been ran to myself since I joined, only pursuing the proper channels to administration to voice my complaints rather than straight up shit talk the group like the rest of the sim, though a majority of the sim's concerns/opinions regarding the Inquisitorious have merit to them. I wanted to see things change in the group for the better, so I pursued that change ICly, the proper way. So for now I believe it best that we not discuss these issues as it'll likely just end up with you not liking me very much.
  10. [18:29] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): Were I unable to dedicate time to the group I would step down, however I am about and creating story for the group even if I am not rping a whole lot with a few of you at this very second. I have note cards for events I have been planning to get underway, and a few alternative roleplay options in the works to allow us to more healthily do our jobs on sim in respect to the community as a whole. Yes, and things are working toward changing for the better, though I am very open to discussion such as thing, I do not allow my personal opinion to get int he way of my job or duty to the faction. As I have expressed from the very start, people are welcome to voice their issues and bring them to me. The group however is as expressed many times not the place to do it.
  11. [18:30] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): Which group?
  12. [18:32] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): You are aware the high inquisitor is nothing more then an npc yes?
  13. [18:32] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): just to clarify this here.
  14. [18:32] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): I'm aware. It's my opinion that the group should be ran by an NPC.
  15. [18:33] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): Regardless, it's an NPC that my character could request a meeting with ICly.
  16. [18:33] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): That NPC is not really around.
  17. [18:34] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): Neither is the leader.
  18. [18:34] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): I am the leader
  19. [18:34] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): Exactly.
  20. [18:34] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): As I said, pursuing this conversation right now is going to end up with you not liking me very much.
  21. [18:34] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): and I have been around.
  22. [18:34] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): I've roleplayed with you twice since I joined.
  23. [18:34] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): So I am very much confused as to where you are coming from with this.
  24. [18:34] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): More then twice actually.
  25. [18:35] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): If I told you that the majority of the group felt the same way as me, would you still be as confused as you are?
  26. [18:36] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): As I said, I have more recently returned and upon doing so have been active. Though I have personally been allocating my time to setting up events for all of you, if you rather I outsource this and focus on training, which was handed instead over to Synade, you and Darius I can do that.
  27. [18:37] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): Well, OOC opinions aside.
  28. [18:37] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): Shelve that side of this conversation for a moment.
  29. [18:37] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): What's stopping your group from developing IC issues with the Chief?
  30. [18:39] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): You mean aside the fact that he is not showing his face to those of the lower ranks too often? Though to be fair, when I am here in the training area most of you are not. We have darius and alex here right now and thats it of everyone about on sim.
  31. [18:39] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): Such as maiming initiates and trainees for voicing logical opinions? Or allowing the Fifth to abuse students in training, on top of teaching forbidden techniques that would overstep the boundaries put in place by Lord Vader and Emperor Palpatine. Things that have been going on within the group had you been active enough to see them play out.
  32. [18:40] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): I'm afraid IC wise we may be in a bit of a pickle. As far as my Chiss is concerned the the Chief and Fifth are a threat to the Empire. I happen to have 7 people that also share those opinions, with logs of RP that have occurred over the past month and a half.
  33. [18:42] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): You mean for questioning his authority and attempting to overstep him, on several fronts in a more militaristic environment. He has been very open to such questions usually, also as mentioned we have been going off of Legends not cannon, our jobs extend past the cannon versions and as for force powers, we are open to all at this current time, with the exception of sith powers specifically Sith alchemy.
  34. [18:42] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): As for the chief being a threat to the empire, that is certainly not the case. He has been consistently going through the appropriate channels.
  35. [18:43] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): As for maiming initiates, I would like to refer to lord vader removing the arm of a trainee as a lesson.
  36. [18:43] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): The training each of you recieve is far more mild
  37. [18:43] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): in that regard.
  38. [18:43] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): As you said yesterday in the conversation where you basically asked me to oust a personal friend of mine for 5 years and made Relapse feel very uncomfortable by basically forcing him to have the hard discussions with Atreyu rather than acting like a leader yourself and pursuing the issues with Atreyu himself. Your words were "I can't handle OOC toxicity, I can handle IC toxicity."
  39. [18:43] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): You're not lord vader rual
  40. [18:43] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): You're an employee of the Empire.
  41. [18:44] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): Yes, I am fully aware of this.
  42. [18:45] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): I am following the material provided to us, and given to us via the outlines set in place thus far. As for my not handling it, I chose to bring in Relapse as an outside opinion, to ensure my own decision was fair, and I asked for this to remain fair to the group and the specific person involved. MY personal experience with him has not been the best, which was why I made that call.
  43. [18:46] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): I can handle ooc toxicity. I said that I would not tolerate it in the group.
  44. [18:46] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): Because ooc toxicity, specifically harassment of other members is a huge no-no.
  45. [18:49] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): I don't believe this can be handled on an OOC front with a resolution that the majority of your group can come to an agreement with as of now, as with most dramatic situations on SL there tends to be a touch of ego and power tripping involved per past experiences in situations like these. Relapse shares the same opinions I've expressed to you today, as does most of the entire sim, Rual. I suggest we allow this to play out ICly and go from there. Relapse and I are having a meeting with Eva, you'll likely be pulled into that at some point.
  46. [18:53] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): And I am telling you I am open to such complaints and issues, which you have made the express decision to not share. I am not here for power, or ego. I am here for the faction and to ensure what is best for the group and the faction as a whole, hence why I have been working on events and planning things to better enhance the roleplay for the group moving forward. The museum was for the group, as a cover to add to the more investigative side of things as previously discussed on several fronts. Though yes its best things are handled icly.
  47. [18:58] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): If that were the case then you would have stepped down when you decided to disappear for a long time to build a sim, that's my opinion on the matter that won't likely change. Relapse was moved in to be an ST for the Inquisitorious. Were you not so detached from your group you would know that the majority far prefer his event style than the basic walk here, hack and slash, walk there, hack and slash. He's truly a breath of fresh air to the group, so with that in mind perhaps writing up events wasn't the best course of action. If it takes you 4 days to change someone's title in a group after they were promoted, if you're -that- busy.. then you need to rethink if you being at the helm is best for the group, anyone with any power or sway over an entire faction has to consider that reality at some point. I'm simply stating that I believe it's far too late now as IC opinions have been developed and the inevitable RP is coming where there will likely be an attempt on the Chief and any who stand with him. I formed this because I wanted to see the group flourish, I care about SWRP and have expressed dearly to any admin or owner that I do not seek leadership should you be removed ICly. I'd much rather it be an NPC. I did not want to have this OOC back and fourth where I have to justify my opinions to you. There are at least 6 of us who share the same opinions ICly. I hope you don't use this as a means to somehow find out about it ICly either. That would definitely cause it to not be handled ICly. That would likely get the attention of the owner and the rest of staff.
  48. [19:07] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): It took me that long because I had a friend who was threatening their own life, whom I was providing emotional support to during that specific time as I expressed to the admin team, and to others. I was often not about for that reason. That being said, if the group prefers his ST events, he is more then welcome to take the mantle in that regard, I have no issues with this, in fact it makes my job easier as I expressed. As for being detatched, if people do not come to me when I have expressed being open to issues, and asked them to come to me with thoughts and opinions, that is on them. As for using this information icly? I don't metagame. I handle things icly as they are meant to be handled, though I am glad you are of the impression that I would even dare do such a thing, though it has been very obvious the amount of insubordination within the group, that was made abundantly clear.
  49. [19:09] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): Never assumed, it was just a warning. You were still online for hours on end during that time. You shouldn't be at the helm if you're unable to fulfill basic responsibilities. Anyway, let's hopefully sort this ICly and once the meeting with Eva, Relapse and I occurs I suppose we'll see what happens from there.
  50. [19:10] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): The first event, was more hack and slash, was also meant to prelude the dawn temple, which was more puzzle based. I ran one full event so far, after returning from the dawn temple, the sith area of the lower temple was going to be fully excavated which again was another more puzzle event then any actual combat, save perhaps one encounter or so.
  51. [19:12] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): The event that wasn't even announced in notices until part two. It's intricacies like that, that are overlooked and give people the notion that the group is a joke. I truly believe that if any leader cares about a group/faction that they will take the necessary steps to ensure that it is thriving, even if that means accepting negligent behavior and stepping down from the helm to allow it to flourish.
  52. [19:12] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): It was announced, the week prior actually
  53. [19:12] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): In discord.
  54. [19:13] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): part two was announced that night due to how late the first part had ran.
  55. [19:13] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): Which a few of us hadn't even had our roles to receive the notice from the chat.
  56. [19:13] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): Everyone was in the group at that point. Except Alex
  57. [19:13] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): You seem to be ignoring the important part here.
  58. [19:14] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): You neglected the group and refuse to step down.
  59. [19:14] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): That's ego.
  60. [19:14] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): A real leader would recognize that he wasn't able to dedicate time to the responsibilities expected of a group leader.
  61. [19:14] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): I was not neglecting the group, though you are entitled to your own opinion. I have been working to ensure the group thrives as much as I possibly can.
  62. [19:14] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): I however do not take the life of a human being
  63. [19:15] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): as being more important then the group.
  64. [19:15] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): If the MAJORITY of your group shares that opinion then perhaps you'll reconsider that being an opinion?
  65. [19:15] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): So I apologize if I put my priorities on ensuring someone who had issues got the help they needed and emotional support necessary.
  66. [19:15] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): You took the sim you were building as more important than the group.
  67. [19:15] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): Not at all
  68. [19:15] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): Don't guilt trip me with personal issues man.
  69. [19:15] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): Not a guilt trip.
  70. [19:15] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): It's a matter of tact.
  71. [19:15] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): Its a fact.
  72. [19:16] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): A matter of acknowledging the reality.
  73. [19:16] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): I was handling that issue.
  74. [19:16] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): You allowed your group to fester and these are the consequences.
  75. [19:16] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): You've got to understand the a large majority of the sim isn't happy with how the Inquisitors are ran or managed either, right?
  76. [19:16] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): I mean we've had a faction leader step down over drama caused by us.
  77. [19:17] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): We've had abilities taken away because of irresponsibility on OUR part.
  78. [19:17] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): Okay, I have listened to your issues, they have been acknowledged, I am concerned with your lack of seeing the flip side of things as well.
  79. [19:17] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): That's fine. Have a good one.
  80. [19:18] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): Dude, I have been working on those issues from the start, I helped come up with many of the solutions for those very issues presented.
  81. [19:18] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): As for Dorene, he has been metagaming for weeks now if thats what your talking about.
  82. [19:18] Blue Swolo (kings2glaciers): Have a good one.
  83. [19:18] Rual Cruxis Engrave (immortalknightage): You as well.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement