In a nutshell, the OPPT appears to be a public trust that has filed documents in the UCC forclosing on

virtually every single Fed-related corporation (inc banks and governments, David Cameron is CEO of the

United Kingdon Corp for example).

Thus, as these entities have been lawfully forclosed upon, and the UCC filings are unrebutted proof of this

(every opportunity was provided for the corporations to rebut the claims), every single contract involving

these corporations are now void.

Thus, people currently think they are working for Barclays, but Barclays no longer lawfully exists. Thus

when Tom Thompson, an alledged accountant at an alledged bank sends you a letter referring to a contract he

claims you have with the alledged bank, you can point them to the UCC filing proving the forclosure of the

corporation he claims to work for, and inform him that since this corporation does not exist, he must

therefore be contacting you in a PERSONAL manner. Since you have no prior contract with Tom Thompson

personally, you can inform him of the terms and conditions of contacting you.

It helps to know about Common Law etc, but it's pretty solid. I'm going to be using it greatly.

The UCC filings are American.

You're not telling corporation X to fuck off because someone else did something. You're responding to the

individual that contacts you, informing them of the forclosure of what they're claiming to represent, with

an unrebutted UCC-filing as the basis for your statement.

The other party is alledging to represent corporation X. You're not telling corporation X to fuck off,

you're pointing out that corporation X has been forclosed, you have the proof to back it up, therefore

they're contacting you with what must be personal liability. What can they do?

Prove that corporation X has not been forclosed on, and therefore still exists? They'd have needed to rebut

the UCC filings (which they had fair time to do).

Prove that you have a lawful contract with them? You are in contact with the individual sending the letter.

If Tom Thompson can prove he has a signed, lawful pre-existing contract with you personally then fantastic.

If not, then there is no currently existing contract, and you are free to inform Tom of the terms and

conditions regarding contracting with you.

this (claims) works for any and every corporate agent that attempts to extort money from you. It's due to

the way people are tied to their strawman (birth certificate) being supposedly removed. From here onwards,

a living breathing flesh & blood human can only contract with another living, breathing, flesh & blood

human. Corporations are legal fictions and have always been of lower standing than us (but not our

fictional strawmen they've been using)

>But what power does this UCC filing actually have? Will it stand it court?

That depends on the court / judge. However, the court would have to have good reason to explain it's

dismissal of your defence, which is an unrebutted, duly verified statement of fact.

In a nutshell, yes a court could ignore it if they wanted (like the Royal courts can ignore evidence

incriminating the Royal's in Diana's "accident")... but they can't do so lawfully, and they know it. They

just hope the "masses" don't know it. This needs strength in numbers.

>Is that a nice way of saying "Fuck off Tom"?

It's more a way of saying "Thanks for contacting me Tom. Your claim to represent this corporation is

incorrect as it has been forclosed on in UCC-[whatevernumberitis]. Therefore you are contacting me in

personal liability. Since we do not have a pre-existing contract between us, here are the terms and

conditions of contacting me. You should be aware that every time you send me a letter, it will incur a

£1,000 charge. Involving a third party (debt collector etc) will incur a $5,000 charge."

Nobody is forcing Tom to reply. If he replies, it is out of his own free will. You've clearly informed him

that he's acting in PERSONAL liability, you've clearly informed him of the charges he will incur for

contracting with you.

The goal, however, is not to extort money from people. The goal is their silence, you want them to stop

sending you letters. Every time you get a letter you reply with an invoice totalling their bill which they

clearly agreed to pay in your terms and conditions. Offer a waiver: Send me written confirmation that you

will no longer contact me and this invoice will be waived.

Uniform Commercial Code.

It doesn't have "authority" over the US government, nor does it claim to. The US government acts and trades

under THE UNITED STATES CORPORATION. What has happened, is a public trust has publically forclosed on these

corporations, in a public process, where they had ample time to rebut the claims against them (massive

fraud etc).

Corporations have no authority, one corporation isn't above any other. If one legal fiction (public trust)

publically and lawfully forcloses on another legal fiction (corporation), supposed "authority" has no

bearing. The law clearly supports the forclosure if it is done lawfully.

Also note that the filings are also applicable to every international equivalent of UCC. It is effective

globally and forecloses on ALL corporate governments worldwide. They have essentially codified human

sovereignty into universal ordinance.

The following documents are the first usable tools that have arisen from these filings.
Banks and “governments” have been foreclosed upon so let us consider a former employee who is now pursuing

you in their capacity as an individual. They believe they still work for a prestigious bank or department.

They believe they are working for their survival, to pay their mortgage, credit card, school fees, to pay

their taxes, etc. Their JOB supports their family, their reputation, their career, until your Courtesy

Notice appears and shatters this illusion. Now they have a choice. Your terms and conditions offer new

rules of engagement based on the new situation. It is like putting a price list on the wall of a coffee

shop. You are now waiting for customers. If your potential customers do not like your terms and conditions,

they are free to go elsewhere - choose another course of action. IT IS NOW YOUR CHOICE WHETHER TO INTERACT

WITH THEM OR NOT. Sending the courtesy notice with their original document attached, informs the Respondent

that you do not wish unlawful harm inflicted upon you and spells out the conditions by which they may

contract with you at their expense. Any subsequent interaction by Respondent engages your Terms and

Conditions will trigger the contract into life, whereby a personal liability expressed as currency is

imposed on Respondent. If they continue to do harm and refuse to pay invoices generated by situations where

the terms and conditions were applicable, you have the option of a UCC filing against the individuals

concerned.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/125529027/OPPT-Courtesy-Notice
http://www.scribd.com/doc/125527943/OPPT-Courtesy-Notice-Guidelines


http://www.mediafire.com/view/?7r4f33gmsok8o3i