Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Dec 27th, 2017
331
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 58.52 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Dec 27 18:01:09 <Nervous> First of all I would like to say thanks to all of you. Thanks for coming to the first meeting of leaders of the LAW alliance.
  2. Dec 27 18:01:09 <FunkSoul> I just downloaded IRC, took me 20 mins to figure out, came right in time
  3. Dec 27 18:01:37 <Nervous> The main idea of this meeting is how can we improve our alliance. We have the best alliance and we should keep it modern and with new challenges.
  4. Dec 27 18:02:02 * dimt (dimt@cit-DA28A8CA.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de) has joined
  5. Dec 27 18:02:09 <dimt> test
  6. Dec 27 18:02:14 <GanstaCJ> passed
  7. Dec 27 18:02:18 <Nervous> I have some topics where we will talk about it and after that I would like to hear your suggestions and advices
  8. Dec 27 18:02:36 <dimt> if irc crashes again imnot gonna reconnect
  9. Dec 27 18:02:48 * Dusty gives channel operator status to Nervous
  10. Dec 27 18:02:48 <Nervous> Topic 1:
  11. Dec 27 18:02:48 <Nervous> I think that our alliance needs innovation. We should host more trainings togethers and making our alliance more interesting. We can try hosting more trainings and special missions togethers. Like 1 per week. What do you think about it?
  12. Dec 27 18:02:52 * Dusty gives channel operator status to Chique
  13. Dec 27 18:02:55 * Dusty gives channel operator status to Prototype
  14. Dec 27 18:02:59 * Dusty gives channel operator status to dimt
  15. Dec 27 18:03:35 <Chique> Agreed. Just a simple training once per week shouldn't be a problem at all.
  16. Dec 27 18:03:43 <FunkSoul> Agreed.
  17. Dec 27 18:03:45 <Chique> Given all the member groups have a lot of trainings in any given week.
  18. Dec 27 18:04:04 <Slow[AF]> Commitment is needed by every single group. But don't make it a simple training, make it an interesting activity
  19. Dec 27 18:04:12 <Slow[AF]> that involves roleplay and communication into it.
  20. Dec 27 18:04:12 <Tomukas> ASAF used to do them every friday, worked fine until it just stopped at some point after a few weeks.
  21. Dec 27 18:04:40 <Chique> Main problem: People loose interest of everything over the time
  22. Dec 27 18:04:50 <Nervous> That's true
  23. Dec 27 18:04:53 <Tomukas> means they need to get something out of it
  24. Dec 27 18:04:58 <Tomukas> could be some sort of a prize
  25. Dec 27 18:05:00 <Nervous> But we should try and keep this rule of the alliance
  26. Dec 27 18:05:09 <Chique> That's why I am okay with keeping it "just a simple training", rather than something too interesting, which needs more effort, and in turn will be faded away soon.
  27. Dec 27 18:05:10 <FunkSoul> Mostly people login to patrol, after that they logout
  28. Dec 27 18:05:10 <Nervous> make a rule
  29. Dec 27 18:05:25 <Chique> I agree on the rule
  30. Dec 27 18:05:27 <iKaLeD> i agree with this idea as all of us know it's necessaryto show more contributions,more activities and more new things to the law side,i'd like to see the whole groups inside LAW alliance playing together,making evets together
  31. Dec 27 18:05:30 <iKaLeD> that's it
  32. Dec 27 18:05:34 <iKaLeD> events*
  33. Dec 27 18:05:42 <Class> Surely a simple training would make it more likely to die out? People think "Oh not this boring driving training again"
  34. Dec 27 18:05:49 <FunkSoul> Rule, elaborate a bit more, I mean if someone doesn't want to join then?
  35. Dec 27 18:05:50 <Slow[AF]> Indeed Class
  36. Dec 27 18:06:01 <Nervous> Depends on the group
  37. Dec 27 18:06:09 <Chique> Because it's not like 1 training per group, it's just 1 training for all the groups. Hardly takes 30 minutes. Steps are like -> Any host from any group starts a training, invites all alliance instead of just group. Easy.
  38. Dec 27 18:06:09 <Tomukas> In my group everyone is forced to do trainings
  39. Dec 27 18:06:19 <Dusty> Since you can not rely on people
  40. Dec 27 18:06:26 <FunkSoul> ^
  41. Dec 27 18:06:37 <Dusty> I'd prefer if those trainings are assigned to specific people
  42. Dec 27 18:06:41 <Dusty> so they have to host it
  43. Dec 27 18:06:47 <Chique> ^ good idea
  44. Dec 27 18:06:51 <Nervous> it can work
  45. Dec 27 18:06:52 <Chique> We can make it turn based
  46. Dec 27 18:06:54 <MHP> or a cycle of groups to be in charge
  47. Dec 27 18:06:54 <Dusty> we'd have some kind of assignment topic in our alliance board
  48. Dec 27 18:06:56 <Tomukas> week 1: SAPD hosts it week 2: FBI hosts it etc.
  49. Dec 27 18:07:00 <Chique> Like 1 week, SAPD should host, another week, FBI hosts
  50. Dec 27 18:07:03 <Chique> Tomukas spoke my mind ^
  51. Dec 27 18:07:08 <Nervous> Like we said some days ago HIQUE
  52. Dec 27 18:07:08 <Tomukas> gg
  53. Dec 27 18:07:11 <Nervous> Chique
  54. Dec 27 18:07:15 * Shadow (Shadow@E8794467.A1962371.78966E84.IP) has joined
  55. Dec 27 18:07:36 <Nervous> OK do you agree that we should organize like this?
  56. Dec 27 18:07:43 <FunkSoul> Agreed, imagine if a group can't really host it, all of them are busy in law scores which has a high possibility then?
  57. Dec 27 18:07:43 <iKaLeD> yes i agree
  58. Dec 27 18:07:45 <Chique> Agreeing to the group cycle.
  59. Dec 27 18:07:47 <Nervous> week 1: x group week 2 : x group
  60. Dec 27 18:07:49 <FunkSoul> the next group takes over it right?
  61. Dec 27 18:08:00 <Tomukas> law scores is a bit of a mess anyways
  62. Dec 27 18:08:01 <Chique> So it's like "Your group" has to only do something every 2 months almost.
  63. Dec 27 18:08:03 * Mousy (androirc@cit-F04FD242.cm-3-2a.dynamic.ziggo.nl) has joined
  64. Dec 27 18:08:10 <Tomukas> We need to stop worrying about those scores so much
  65. Dec 27 18:08:16 <Nervous> Yes and you have a lot of time
  66. Dec 27 18:08:20 <Slow[AF]> They should not fully focus on law scores. Hosting a weekly training takes nothing.
  67. Dec 27 18:08:25 <Nervous> if you want to organize an special training etc
  68. Dec 27 18:08:27 <Dusty> yeah fuck law scores
  69. Dec 27 18:08:27 <Tomukas> because it's making groups compete against each other
  70. Dec 27 18:08:27 <FunkSoul> Yeah Tom but that's 1 thing which pretty much can happen
  71. Dec 27 18:08:39 <Chique> I think we will come back to law scores point later.
  72. Dec 27 18:08:44 <iKaLeD> a Schedule
  73. Dec 27 18:08:44 <Tomukas> Personally, I send my group for like 3 hours to go and fight in the desert
  74. Dec 27 18:08:44 <iKaLeD> plan is important for that
  75. Dec 27 18:08:45 <Chique> Right now discussing about group training
  76. Dec 27 18:08:47 <Nervous> Yes
  77. Dec 27 18:08:48 <Dusty> if it were for law scores, groups like Global army would beofficial
  78. Dec 27 18:08:56 <Nervous> USNSs do you agree?
  79. Dec 27 18:08:59 <Tomukas> GLA is official LOL
  80. Dec 27 18:09:04 <FunkSoul> really?
  81. Dec 27 18:09:04 <Nervous> what
  82. Dec 27 18:09:06 <Nervous> now?
  83. Dec 27 18:09:06 <Tomukas> it's L5
  84. Dec 27 18:09:07 <FunkSoul> ._.
  85. Dec 27 18:09:10 <Dusty> like L9 official
  86. Dec 27 18:09:13 <Tomukas> oh
  87. Dec 27 18:09:13 <FunkSoul> L6 is official
  88. Dec 27 18:09:19 <LeGe> We can try, I agree
  89. Dec 27 18:09:22 <Dusty> anyways
  90. Dec 27 18:09:27 <Tomukas> someone should make the schedule
  91. Dec 27 18:09:27 <Dusty> about the training thing
  92. Dec 27 18:09:28 <GanstaCJ> I agree
  93. Dec 27 18:09:30 <Tomukas> or we can just do it now
  94. Dec 27 18:09:40 <iKaLeD> guys i can't read 15178 msg,why we don't talk 1 by 1?
  95. Dec 27 18:09:40 <Dusty> is there a way we can work this out beyond IRC?
  96. Dec 27 18:09:44 <Chique> Yeah just make it alphabetical order, easy.
  97. Dec 27 18:09:51 <Chique> Start from January 2018
  98. Dec 27 18:09:57 <FunkSoul> Make a topic on law board?
  99. Dec 27 18:09:58 <Nervous> Alright
  100. Dec 27 18:10:00 <MHP> assign 2 persons to make the schedule, done
  101. Dec 27 18:10:05 <Nervous> Yes Funk probably
  102. Dec 27 18:10:06 <Tomukas> Chique and nervous?
  103. Dec 27 18:10:14 <Chique> Alliance board, yes. So groups should report in that topic after a training is done every week.
  104. Dec 27 18:10:16 <Nervous> do what
  105. Dec 27 18:10:31 <Chique> It's like a common training report topic we all have in our groups.
  106. Dec 27 18:10:39 <MHP> also it might be obvious, but the group to host the alliance training should probably prepare at least 2 hosts, in case someone doesnt make it for some reaosn
  107. Dec 27 18:10:43 <Shadow> You need a good report, hosting such thing with 10+ cop name is annoying
  108. Dec 27 18:11:02 <Nervous> yes with 500+ words
  109. Dec 27 18:11:08 <Nervous> not 500 but a few
  110. Dec 27 18:11:11 <FunkSoul> too much? D:
  111. Dec 27 18:11:13 <Chique> Why would you need so many words though?
  112. Dec 27 18:11:16 <FunkSoul> ^
  113. Dec 27 18:11:23 <Chique> What is needed is just a short explanation of what was done, and list of names
  114. Dec 27 18:11:26 <Nervous> not 500 but with motivation
  115. Dec 27 18:11:28 <Chique> Or even SS of names of those participated
  116. Dec 27 18:11:29 <Tomukas> depends what you host
  117. Dec 27 18:11:30 <Class> So that would make it AF - FBI - SAPD - TF - USNS starting in the new year? Still haven't tackled the problem about the content of the training. It needs to probably be a heavily role play based one to keep people interested
  118. Dec 27 18:11:32 <Shadow> List of names should be List of groups
  119. Dec 27 18:11:46 <Shadow> instead of saying the cop name you mention his group
  120. Dec 27 18:11:52 <Chique> Class, since it's turn based among the groups, the groups will decide on the content
  121. Dec 27 18:11:59 <Chique> And every group is getting almost 2 months to prepare theirs
  122. Dec 27 18:12:09 <Chique> So fairly sure we can have 2-3 hosts prepared, and a good content
  123. Dec 27 18:12:14 <Chique> Should hold true for all the groups
  124. Dec 27 18:12:17 <Class> You'd like to think so
  125. Dec 27 18:12:19 <Slow[AF]> Then hopefully none will take 2 months to prepare a driving training
  126. Dec 27 18:12:24 <Tomukas> lmao
  127. Dec 27 18:12:25 <MHP> and no need to limit the type of training, let groups use their creativity
  128. Dec 27 18:12:26 <Class> Wouldn't be suprised ^
  129. Dec 27 18:12:30 <Slow[AF]> ^^
  130. Dec 27 18:12:40 <Nervous> I agree with MHP
  131. Dec 27 18:12:43 <Tomukas> super driving training
  132. Dec 27 18:12:44 <FunkSoul> We should for real plan on taking LV once xd
  133. Dec 27 18:12:44 <Chique> Agreeing to MHP
  134. Dec 27 18:12:48 <Tomukas> 2 hours long driving training
  135. Dec 27 18:12:53 <Chique> Why though?
  136. Dec 27 18:12:57 <Tomukas> lmao
  137. Dec 27 18:13:03 <Chique> Why not the same we do for our own groups?
  138. Dec 27 18:13:05 <Shadow> I'd like to work with Tomukas on some roleplay, we can also create some neat youtube videos advertising the server and stuff.
  139. Dec 27 18:13:05 <Chique> 30 mins tops
  140. Dec 27 18:13:08 <iKaLeD> LV plan? is that important for our system?
  141. Dec 27 18:13:09 <Chique> Too long = boring as shit training
  142. Dec 27 18:13:21 <Tomukas> Shadow don't we have a video?
  143. Dec 27 18:13:23 <Nervous> Shadow you can make some publicity of the alliance too
  144. Dec 27 18:13:23 <Tomukas> of ASAF training
  145. Dec 27 18:13:24 <FunkSoul> kaled, according to groups system turfing is a must
  146. Dec 27 18:13:25 <Tomukas> you made one
  147. Dec 27 18:13:36 <Mousy> I think the subjective is that there will be a monthly training by one of the official law groups, am I correct? I joined later.
  148. Dec 27 18:13:37 <Tomukas> the massive convoy
  149. Dec 27 18:13:41 <Prototype> What LV plan? Who will go to LV anyway
  150. Dec 27 18:13:52 <Shadow> its an old video, I think a new one would be better
  151. Dec 27 18:13:54 <iKaLeD> i don't support LV here
  152. Dec 27 18:13:59 <MHP> WWEKLY*
  153. Dec 27 18:14:01 <Chique> Ye, it could be a RP based turfing mission, massive convoy, protect the VIP type of RP, and so on.
  154. Dec 27 18:14:06 <Nervous> Ok let's try to focus on the topic
  155. Dec 27 18:14:11 <Tomukas> RP and turfing doesn't work together
  156. Dec 27 18:14:12 <Nervous> 1 training per week
  157. Dec 27 18:14:19 <Mousy> Weekly @MHP?
  158. Dec 27 18:14:20 <Tomukas> RP is too slow for turfing
  159. Dec 27 18:14:21 <MHP> yes
  160. Dec 27 18:14:27 <Shadow> I also can help do some protect the president using EM panel and stuff
  161. Dec 27 18:14:33 <Chique> You guys are confusing hardcore RP with Semi-RP
  162. Dec 27 18:14:42 <FunkSoul> ^
  163. Dec 27 18:14:43 <Tomukas> There is an important announcement from TF by the way.
  164. Dec 27 18:14:53 <Chique> Going into LV with helicopters, regrouping, dividing into squads = this is semi RP
  165. Dec 27 18:14:54 <Tomukas> But how about we do a progress report from each person on their groups.
  166. Dec 27 18:14:55 <MHP> anything else on the weekly training topic?
  167. Dec 27 18:14:59 <Chique> You don't need to type /me in LV lol
  168. Dec 27 18:15:02 <Dusty> yea one thing
  169. Dec 27 18:15:17 <iKaLeD> or /do as well ^^
  170. Dec 27 18:15:17 <Slow[AF]> Just the way Tyler Durden hosted those back then
  171. Dec 27 18:15:22 <Dusty> how do we manage grades and stuff?
  172. Dec 27 18:15:26 <Chique> We don't
  173. Dec 27 18:15:29 <Chique> Shouldn't have grades
  174. Dec 27 18:15:30 <Tomukas> grades?
  175. Dec 27 18:15:32 <FunkSoul> no need imo
  176. Dec 27 18:15:35 <Chique> Can't be done for 50 people
  177. Dec 27 18:15:35 <Dusty> ok thats what I thought
  178. Dec 27 18:15:39 <Chique> So just names of people joining
  179. Dec 27 18:15:44 <Dusty> might also be biased
  180. Dec 27 18:15:47 <Tomukas> in the training explanation
  181. Dec 27 18:15:49 <Nervous> and unfair
  182. Dec 27 18:15:53 <Tomukas> just put like how everyone did in general
  183. Dec 27 18:15:57 <Tomukas> they did well/could improve etc.
  184. Dec 27 18:16:01 <Chique> And I don't know why everyone started going into the concent. Content isn't much of a problem. Even if 1 week's content is bad, we can improve gradually.
  185. Dec 27 18:16:02 <Nervous> Yes
  186. Dec 27 18:16:07 <FunkSoul> groups will compete then will cause hatred
  187. Dec 27 18:16:08 <FunkSoul> so no
  188. Dec 27 18:16:09 <Tomukas> Nervous
  189. Dec 27 18:16:14 <Tomukas> should we have an update from every group now?
  190. Dec 27 18:16:15 <Shadow> Chique the name of the participants is a pain in the ass, I'd say group names instead
  191. Dec 27 18:16:17 <Chique> Yeah, no marks, no grades. Just list of names.
  192. Dec 27 18:16:25 <Chique> Shadow, SS of people in a line.
  193. Dec 27 18:16:28 <Chique> Why is it a pain?
  194. Dec 27 18:16:34 <Chique> Not asking anyone to type 100 names
  195. Dec 27 18:16:39 <Shadow> could work, but typing each name eh
  196. Dec 27 18:16:41 <Prototype> I have to reconnect
  197. Dec 27 18:16:43 <Tomukas> not like we are going to get 30 people
  198. Dec 27 18:16:47 <Chique> Never said "type"
  199. Dec 27 18:16:48 * Prototype has quit (Quit: Always try to be modest, and be proud about it!)
  200. Dec 27 18:16:50 <Chique> SS would do
  201. Dec 27 18:16:50 <Nervous> Probably make an announcement in every group will work
  202. Dec 27 18:16:55 <Nervous> so they know
  203. Dec 27 18:17:01 <iKaLeD> group name is fine,why writing a big number of people who joined
  204. Dec 27 18:17:07 <Nervous> when the group is the hoster
  205. Dec 27 18:17:09 <FunkSoul> yeah rate the group overall
  206. Dec 27 18:17:09 <Dusty> https://pastebin.com/raw/u1KYVF2s
  207. Dec 27 18:17:13 * Prototype (Prototype@87E8A173.87EFC86A.C1BC138E.IP) has joined
  208. Dec 27 18:17:23 <Prototype> .
  209. Dec 27 18:17:27 <Class> .
  210. Dec 27 18:17:32 <Prototype> I am at x-chat now
  211. Dec 27 18:17:36 <Dusty> hold on proto
  212. Dec 27 18:17:51 <Nervous> Smoething else about this?
  213. Dec 27 18:17:59 <Nervous> dimit
  214. Dec 27 18:18:01 <Chique> Negative
  215. Dec 27 18:18:07 <Tomukas> it's dimt
  216. Dec 27 18:18:17 <FunkSoul> Negative
  217. Dec 27 18:18:19 <Nervous> Ok
  218. Dec 27 18:18:20 <iKaLeD> everything is clear i think
  219. Dec 27 18:18:22 <dimt> yes
  220. Dec 27 18:18:36 <dimt> because my irc kept crashing
  221. Dec 27 18:18:42 <Tomukas> Can TF make my announcement now?
  222. Dec 27 18:18:47 <Tomukas> make an*
  223. Dec 27 18:18:50 <iKaLeD> i have another idea about official LAW leaders meeting
  224. Dec 27 18:18:53 <Dusty> you can
  225. Dec 27 18:19:17 <Tomukas> So we wanted to this for the past couple months but we didn't really know how, now stuff is getting sorted.
  226. Dec 27 18:19:21 <iKaLeD> 1 meeting per month for official LAW leaders is important too
  227. Dec 27 18:19:28 <Tomukas> TF decided that we're going full military.
  228. Dec 27 18:19:41 <Prototype> Please listen to Tomukas
  229. Dec 27 18:19:43 <Tomukas> Our job is getting changed to military etc.
  230. Dec 27 18:19:44 <Prototype> it is really important
  231. Dec 27 18:19:44 <Nervous> i have another topic
  232. Dec 27 18:19:52 <Chique> 1 by 1 please
  233. Dec 27 18:19:53 <Nervous> tomukas
  234. Dec 27 18:19:57 <iKaLeD> listening to tomukas
  235. Dec 27 18:19:58 <Nervous> hold your topic
  236. Dec 27 18:20:04 <Dusty> no, let them talk
  237. Dec 27 18:20:17 <Nervous> go ahead
  238. Dec 27 18:20:42 <Tomukas> So that's about it, we're just getting changed to military so there is going to be less TF presence in LS.
  239. Dec 27 18:20:50 <Tomukas> Just giving you all a heads up.
  240. Dec 27 18:20:53 <Chique> Oh okay
  241. Dec 27 18:20:57 <Chique> Nervous go ahead to the 2nd topic
  242. Dec 27 18:20:59 <FunkSoul> how often will you guys patrol, 0 or a bit?
  243. Dec 27 18:21:06 <Tomukas> A bit as far as I know.
  244. Dec 27 18:21:13 <Tomukas> Since we spend all of our time in the desert already anyway.
  245. Dec 27 18:21:17 <FunkSoul> Fine then, don't really exclude out of LS
  246. Dec 27 18:21:19 <Dusty> true
  247. Dec 27 18:21:23 <iKaLeD> excuse me tomukas but the law score ?
  248. Dec 27 18:21:26 <FunkSoul> Going Military is fine then
  249. Dec 27 18:21:35 <Chique> What about the law score?
  250. Dec 27 18:21:35 <Tomukas> we're not following that anymore
  251. Dec 27 18:21:50 <Prototype> That means there will be another place for Military in CIT. It is a global update, not only in group
  252. Dec 27 18:21:53 <FunkSoul> IronMan suggested Military score, have a look at that topic afaik
  253. Dec 27 18:21:55 <iKaLeD> staffs might warn you to take care of it maybe?
  254. Dec 27 18:22:09 <Mousy> Military s ore
  255. Dec 27 18:22:12 <Tomukas> law scores is a pile of ---- anyway
  256. Dec 27 18:22:16 <Tomukas> To be honest.
  257. Dec 27 18:22:18 <Nervous> We all want to wish you good luck
  258. Dec 27 18:22:18 <Chique> Yeah so all questions are answered ^
  259. Dec 27 18:22:21 <Nervous> and we are here of course
  260. Dec 27 18:22:22 <Tomukas> Good groups got demoted for not getting the score.
  261. Dec 27 18:22:35 <FunkSoul> yeah, shit system
  262. Dec 27 18:22:43 <iKaLeD> yes i have noticed that
  263. Dec 27 18:22:44 <Nervous> ok
  264. Dec 27 18:22:49 <Mousy> Military score, what is the difference with law score? Just AF and USNS fighting for n1 place?
  265. Dec 27 18:22:51 <Dusty> to be fair, law score is as odd as them expecting us to turf
  266. Dec 27 18:23:00 <FunkSoul> ^^^^
  267. Dec 27 18:23:02 <Chique> Mousy it'll be based on Rebel vs Military turfs
  268. Dec 27 18:23:25 <Mousy> ?
  269. Dec 27 18:23:26 <Randp> can someone explain me the importance of these law scores and why everyone keeps talking about them as if they are god?
  270. Dec 27 18:23:28 <Class> Got to fight them 4 rebels online o.O
  271. Dec 27 18:23:31 <Tomukas> And there will be groups moving over to Rebels
  272. Dec 27 18:23:34 <Chique> Same question Randp
  273. Dec 27 18:23:42 <MHP> fuck law scores ay
  274. Dec 27 18:23:45 <Chique> I have 0 clue, and 0 respect to people who keeps saying "I got the APB"
  275. Dec 27 18:23:47 <Chique> 0 fucks given
  276. Dec 27 18:23:53 <Mousy> ^
  277. Dec 27 18:23:55 <Tomukas> APB HUNTER TOMUKAS 11-55
  278. Dec 27 18:23:56 <Nervous> Topic 2:
  279. Dec 27 18:23:56 <Nervous> I want to do a call to the unification of this alliance. This means that we should keep more meetings between us. This will make an strong relation between us. Do you agree with it?
  280. Dec 27 18:23:56 <Tomukas> lmao
  281. Dec 27 18:23:57 <Randp> wtf is all the fuss about
  282. Dec 27 18:23:59 <Slow[AF]> None randpy, just a shitty mindset that has evolved throughout this year
  283. Dec 27 18:24:01 <iKaLeD> blackwolf's word
  284. Dec 27 18:24:02 <Randp> whats law scores lol
  285. Dec 27 18:24:11 <Shadow> APB HUNTER is here
  286. Dec 27 18:24:15 <iKaLeD> lol
  287. Dec 27 18:24:16 <FunkSoul> Randp, it aint good, it's just what some law groups focus on these days
  288. Dec 27 18:24:23 <Chique> Nervous I would like an IG meeting instead. See we all are online here, so why can't we make this a thing every month IG?
  289. Dec 27 18:24:31 <FunkSoul> you get good law scores> you get promoted... pathetic
  290. Dec 27 18:24:34 <Chique> In a government looking interior, more RP.
  291. Dec 27 18:24:42 <Randp> okay that's obvious
  292. Dec 27 18:24:45 <Nervous> Yes it can work Chique
  293. Dec 27 18:24:47 <Dusty> I don't mind
  294. Dec 27 18:24:52 <Tomukas> satffs monitor our activity via law scores
  295. Dec 27 18:24:54 <Tomukas> which is crap
  296. Dec 27 18:24:58 <FunkSoul> yeah tom
  297. Dec 27 18:24:59 <Nervous> please:
  298. Dec 27 18:25:01 <Nervous> I want to do a call to the unification of this alliance. This means that we should keep more meetings between us. This will make an strong relation between us. Do you agree with it?
  299. Dec 27 18:25:06 <Randp> but do they check law scores so strictly that you all keep talking about it?
  300. Dec 27 18:25:06 <Chique> (Guys law score related stuff can be discussed later, it's sort of a suggestion / changes to CIT, not related to our Alliance meeting)
  301. Dec 27 18:25:10 <LeGe> they will start doing the same via military scores sooner or later tom
  302. Dec 27 18:25:28 <MHP> lets move to Nervous' topic
  303. Dec 27 18:25:43 <Chique> ^
  304. Dec 27 18:25:47 <Tomukas> More meetings like these would be good yeah.
  305. Dec 27 18:25:51 <Tomukas> Every month or so.
  306. Dec 27 18:25:51 <Nervous> more meetings guys
  307. Dec 27 18:25:53 <Chique> IG or IRC?
  308. Dec 27 18:25:54 <FunkSoul> Arent we already united? xd
  309. Dec 27 18:25:57 <iKaLeD> as i said 1 meeting per month is good
  310. Dec 27 18:26:08 <FunkSoul> agrred^
  311. Dec 27 18:26:11 <FunkSoul> agreed*
  312. Dec 27 18:26:11 <LeGe> ^
  313. Dec 27 18:26:13 <Prototype> Once 3 months maybe?
  314. Dec 27 18:26:14 <Dusty> I don't mind ingame meetings
  315. Dec 27 18:26:14 <Nervous> depends it can be IG too
  316. Dec 27 18:26:21 <FunkSoul> no, per month would be nice
  317. Dec 27 18:26:21 <Prototype> 1 month passes so fast
  318. Dec 27 18:26:23 <Nervous> more real
  319. Dec 27 18:26:24 <Prototype> Alright
  320. Dec 27 18:26:26 <Tomukas> 1 meeting every season? nah
  321. Dec 27 18:26:26 <iKaLeD> IRC is better than IG chique
  322. Dec 27 18:26:26 <Chique> Agreeing to Once in 3 months
  323. Dec 27 18:26:34 <FunkSoul> :o
  324. Dec 27 18:26:36 <Chique> People saying once every month will not be here after 6 months
  325. Dec 27 18:26:42 <Chique> Because "got bored"
  326. Dec 27 18:26:45 <FunkSoul> okay 3 months, I'm fine as long as we keep on meeting lol
  327. Dec 27 18:26:46 <Class> 6 weeks?
  328. Dec 27 18:26:49 <Nervous> once in 3 months and we can make more if the topic is very important or urgent
  329. Dec 27 18:26:55 <dimt> people saying 1 training per week will not be here anymore in 3 weeks
  330. Dec 27 18:26:56 <Chique> ^
  331. Dec 27 18:27:01 <MHP> I mean meetings are great and all. But maybe we should also learn to utilize our shared alliance board for actually making these types of announcements and decisions
  332. Dec 27 18:27:13 <FunkSoul> that^
  333. Dec 27 18:27:26 <Nervous> Yes MHP
  334. Dec 27 18:27:29 <Nervous> I agree too.
  335. Dec 27 18:27:31 <MHP> dont have to hold up 5 topics for a meeting when we could deal with them gradually on forum where people can post replies whenever they have time across whatever timezone
  336. Dec 27 18:27:36 <FunkSoul> the law alliance board isn't used that much, we should pretty much focus on that too
  337. Dec 27 18:27:51 <Nervous> make it more active
  338. Dec 27 18:27:53 <Chique> And do what?
  339. Dec 27 18:27:56 <Chique> Chat spams?
  340. Dec 27 18:28:02 <Nervous> trivia games
  341. Dec 27 18:28:06 <Nervous> no joke
  342. Dec 27 18:28:07 <Chique> -_-
  343. Dec 27 18:28:08 <FunkSoul> trainings, meeting dates? xd
  344. Dec 27 18:28:11 <MHP> not saying no to meetings, meetings create some cool shared experience too, but combining that with better use of our board = WIN WIN WIN
  345. Dec 27 18:28:15 <Chique> Training topic is the best idea I got from this meeting so far
  346. Dec 27 18:28:20 <Slow[AF]> How will that fully raise the activity on that board Funk?
  347. Dec 27 18:28:29 <iKaLeD> what else you can put into law alliance board,just meeting,chatting or training
  348. Dec 27 18:28:42 <Chique> ^
  349. Dec 27 18:28:48 <Nervous> What about if we make a roster
  350. Dec 27 18:28:54 <FunkSoul> already have one?
  351. Dec 27 18:28:59 <Chique> Roster for what?
  352. Dec 27 18:29:03 <Tomukas> no one uses chat topics on alliance boards
  353. Dec 27 18:29:06 <GanstaCJ> that'll take a billion years lol
  354. Dec 27 18:29:06 <MHP> when you wanna introduce a new idea, ask opinions, make announcements u can make a topic, instead of saving it till the next meeting (potetially months in the future)
  355. Dec 27 18:29:19 <Chique> So a Training topic, Suggestions topic
  356. Dec 27 18:29:21 <Prototype> Let's talk about Blacklist stuff maybe?
  357. Dec 27 18:29:24 <FunkSoul> ask opinions is a good one
  358. Dec 27 18:29:24 <iKaLeD> a waste of time ^^ if we add roster
  359. Dec 27 18:29:26 <Nervous> yes proto
  360. Dec 27 18:29:32 <GanstaCJ> isn't the BL already active though
  361. Dec 27 18:29:33 <Nervous> Prototype that's my 3rd topic
  362. Dec 27 18:29:45 <Chique> So this topic is closed I guess?
  363. Dec 27 18:29:45 <FunkSoul> events?
  364. Dec 27 18:29:49 <Nervous> wait
  365. Dec 27 18:30:10 <Nervous> meetings per 3 months or 1 month? VOTE
  366. Dec 27 18:30:15 <FunkSoul> 3 months.
  367. Dec 27 18:30:16 <LeGe> 3 months
  368. Dec 27 18:30:16 <Chique> 3 months
  369. Dec 27 18:30:16 <iKaLeD> 1 month
  370. Dec 27 18:30:17 <Tomukas> 3
  371. Dec 27 18:30:31 <Mousy> 3 months
  372. Dec 27 18:30:32 <Class> 3
  373. Dec 27 18:30:33 <Prototype> 3
  374. Dec 27 18:30:34 <Dusty> 2
  375. Dec 27 18:30:38 <iKaLeD> LOL
  376. Dec 27 18:30:39 <Dusty> 3
  377. Dec 27 18:30:46 <Nervous> ok 3 months
  378. Dec 27 18:30:49 <MHP> 1
  379. Dec 27 18:30:49 <MHP> 2
  380. Dec 27 18:30:49 <MHP> 3
  381. Dec 27 18:30:53 <GanstaCJ> 4
  382. Dec 27 18:30:54 <GanstaCJ> 5
  383. Dec 27 18:30:54 <GanstaCJ> 6
  384. Dec 27 18:30:56 <iKaLeD> 7
  385. Dec 27 18:30:58 <Nervous> let's move to the 3rd Topic of this meeting
  386. Dec 27 18:30:58 <Prototype> ...
  387. Dec 27 18:30:59 <Chique> We don't want your phone number
  388. Dec 27 18:30:59 <Tomukas> 8
  389. Dec 27 18:30:59 <Randp> .....
  390. Dec 27 18:31:01 <FunkSoul> LOL
  391. Dec 27 18:31:03 <Nervous> wait......
  392. Dec 27 18:31:06 <Nervous> do not spam
  393. Dec 27 18:31:10 <Chique> This is what we do in meetings
  394. Dec 27 18:31:17 <Chique> Suggestions topic is much better as MHP said
  395. Dec 27 18:31:25 <Chique> Yeah move on to next topic
  396. Dec 27 18:31:31 <Nervous> are you enjoying the meeting?
  397. Dec 27 18:31:38 <Chique> The actual 2 points, yes
  398. Dec 27 18:31:38 <Prototype> Make it quick
  399. Dec 27 18:31:38 <FunkSoul> ye, hungry
  400. Dec 27 18:31:39 <MHP> if we want to do meetings we might also discuss the platform on which the meeting should be on, to maximize the organization of the meeting
  401. Dec 27 18:31:45 <Prototype> Topic: blabla. Decision: blabla
  402. Dec 27 18:31:45 <iKaLeD> could we talk 1 by 1 in the next topic? i can't read a lot of msg
  403. Dec 27 18:31:52 <Nervous> topic 3:
  404. Dec 27 18:31:55 <Randp> suggestions topic is good idea and stuff, until you start getting these stupid little suggestions and no one pays atention
  405. Dec 27 18:31:57 <Randp> to them
  406. Dec 27 18:32:08 <Randp> and the topic is dead
  407. Dec 27 18:32:12 <Nervous> The blacklist. Should we add more rules about it?
  408. Dec 27 18:32:17 <Nervous> or new stuff
  409. Dec 27 18:32:22 <Shadow> or more people
  410. Dec 27 18:32:23 <FunkSoul> example?
  411. Dec 27 18:32:24 <Tomukas> the blacklist is fine
  412. Dec 27 18:32:29 <Chique> As long as it's group vote based it's fine
  413. Dec 27 18:32:30 <Nervous> it's an open question
  414. Dec 27 18:32:44 <Shadow> blacklist is outdated i think
  415. Dec 27 18:32:51 <Chique> Outdated? as in?
  416. Dec 27 18:32:51 * Prototype has quit (Read error)
  417. Dec 27 18:32:54 <Chique> No one updates?
  418. Dec 27 18:32:55 * Mousy (androirc@cit-F04FD242.cm-3-2a.dynamic.ziggo.nl) has left (Stop-bericht)
  419. Dec 27 18:32:59 <Shadow> most players in it quit the game
  420. Dec 27 18:33:00 <FunkSoul> You can add people to the blacklist, no rules tho, rules are fine.
  421. Dec 27 18:33:08 <Shadow> or banned
  422. Dec 27 18:33:15 <Chique> If people quit the game, it's not outdated
  423. Dec 27 18:33:25 * MousySAPD (MousySAPD@cit-F04FD242.cm-3-2a.dynamic.ziggo.nl) has joined
  424. Dec 27 18:33:26 * Prototype (Prototype@87E8A173.87EFC86A.C1BC138E.IP) has joined
  425. Dec 27 18:33:37 <Nervous> Probably I agree that we can add more
  426. Dec 27 18:33:42 <Chique> more what?
  427. Dec 27 18:33:43 <Shadow> when was the last update, probably 1-2 years
  428. Dec 27 18:33:46 <iKaLeD> maybe LAW moderators not updating it
  429. Dec 27 18:33:48 <Prototype> add more what? I DCed
  430. Dec 27 18:33:50 * MousySAPD is now known as Mousy
  431. Dec 27 18:33:58 <Nervous> but due to the lack of communication between us makes it old
  432. Dec 27 18:33:59 <FunkSoul> Ikaled I was about to come on that topic
  433. Dec 27 18:34:10 <Nervous> more people
  434. Dec 27 18:34:17 <iKaLeD> as i see some law moderators should be changed
  435. Dec 27 18:34:21 <Chique> like adding more people to the BL?
  436. Dec 27 18:34:35 <FunkSoul> law moderators, active ones need to update the BL? Idk how the Blacklist system works. One group suggests, the others vote right?
  437. Dec 27 18:34:36 <Nervous> Yes, i'm sure that we can agree with some names
  438. Dec 27 18:34:36 <Prototype> Nervous, there is a topic for blacklists but still some groups don't use it and judge others just because they accepted their BLed member
  439. Dec 27 18:34:42 <Prototype> No Chique
  440. Dec 27 18:35:10 <Nervous> what are you talking about Prototype
  441. Dec 27 18:35:16 <Prototype> About BL
  442. Dec 27 18:35:32 <Chique> If your group thinks someone should be BL'd on LAW, post it on the topic
  443. Dec 27 18:35:35 <Chique> All group votes
  444. Dec 27 18:35:41 <Chique> Decides if he gets added or not
  445. Dec 27 18:35:42 <Prototype> But there is another problem
  446. Dec 27 18:35:48 <Chique> Is this followed right now?
  447. Dec 27 18:36:03 <Prototype> Let's say Ahmed is BLed in TF. (EXAMPLE). He applies for FBI and they accept it
  448. Dec 27 18:36:09 <FunkSoul> I don't see any group posting there altho many people deserve to be in that bl
  449. Dec 27 18:36:13 <Prototype> then TF is like "Wtf FBI what r u doing"
  450. Dec 27 18:36:24 <Chique> That shouldn't happen &
  451. Dec 27 18:36:33 <Chique> As the guy is not in LAW BL
  452. Dec 27 18:36:35 <Nervous> ``````````^^^^^^^^
  453. Dec 27 18:36:38 <Nervous> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  454. Dec 27 18:36:38 <Chique> Groups shouldn't do that
  455. Dec 27 18:36:45 <Nervous> I 100% agree
  456. Dec 27 18:36:53 <Prototype> I agree about your case Chique. But some leaders take it so serious
  457. Dec 27 18:36:55 <Chique> If TF is like "wtf FBI" then TF should post on the BL topic
  458. Dec 27 18:37:02 <Chique> and request a LAW BL on that guy instead
  459. Dec 27 18:37:05 <dimt> in ASAF we have 3 BL levels
  460. Dec 27 18:37:16 * Prototype is now known as Prototype|AFKfor15mins
  461. Dec 27 18:37:16 <FunkSoul> yeah, not to kick the group like we did to DT
  462. Dec 27 18:37:24 <dimt> L1 is for the ones only the group cares about, L2 means that the other group needs to contact them about the applicant
  463. Dec 27 18:37:26 <Tomukas> DT was a whole different case
  464. Dec 27 18:37:32 <Tomukas> they would constantly not listen
  465. Dec 27 18:37:34 <Mousy> You're completely right, Chique.
  466. Dec 27 18:37:39 <Mousy> That's how it should go indeed.
  467. Dec 27 18:37:39 <Tomukas> as if they were asking for it
  468. Dec 27 18:37:43 <dimt> maybe it could be somehow useful for LAW alliance aswell
  469. Dec 27 18:37:54 <FunkSoul> Agreed
  470. Dec 27 18:37:58 <Chique> Agreed as well
  471. Dec 27 18:38:03 <iKaLeD> agreed as well
  472. Dec 27 18:38:03 <dimt> a list of ppl on which ppl should communicate before accepting, but not neccessarily fully blacklisting them from the whole alliance
  473. Dec 27 18:38:04 <Dusty> so L1 is basically the groups own blacklist?
  474. Dec 27 18:38:10 <Chique> But over here L1 won't make sense
  475. Dec 27 18:38:18 <FunkSoul> ^
  476. Dec 27 18:38:18 <Chique> Actually 3 levels don't make sense
  477. Dec 27 18:38:22 <dimt> just making other ppl aware of whats going on with the applicant and having a small talk with them so they have all rquired information
  478. Dec 27 18:38:28 <Chique> a LAW BL should be a global one, where the other group can't accept them
  479. Dec 27 18:38:45 <Tomukas> but checking every group's BL is a pain
  480. Dec 27 18:38:48 <Chique> And to have someone in the Law BL, the requesting group should request, all groups vote
  481. Dec 27 18:38:49 <Tomukas> we should have a main one
  482. Dec 27 18:38:56 <FunkSoul> agreed on what tom said
  483. Dec 27 18:38:59 <dimt> ik chique but there are some ppl like for example khazix
  484. Dec 27 18:39:08 <FunkSoul> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
  485. Dec 27 18:39:14 <FunkSoul> that dimit, was gonna say that hh
  486. Dec 27 18:39:15 <dimt> who are not bad enough to be in the LAW bl but stupid enough that other leaders need to know about his stupidity
  487. Dec 27 18:39:22 <Dusty> lol
  488. Dec 27 18:39:23 <FunkSoul> exactly
  489. Dec 27 18:39:26 <dimt> so they can decide wisely wether to accept him or not, without forcing them to deny him
  490. Dec 27 18:39:28 <Tomukas> lmao
  491. Dec 27 18:39:38 <Shadow> word
  492. Dec 27 18:40:00 <Nervous> Do you agree to add the system of the ASAF alliance in the LAW alliance board?
  493. Dec 27 18:40:02 <Dusty> so this would ... essentially .. be an advisory list
  494. Dec 27 18:40:09 <FunkSoul> lol
  495. Dec 27 18:40:09 <Chique> I agree on 2 levels only
  496. Dec 27 18:40:14 <dimt> maybe adding a watch list in the LAW bl topic?
  497. Dec 27 18:40:18 <iKaLeD> i agree on all the levels
  498. Dec 27 18:40:27 <Dusty> I am ok with adding a watch list
  499. Dec 27 18:40:33 <Chique> Watchlist + BL
  500. Dec 27 18:40:36 <Nervous> i agree too
  501. Dec 27 18:40:38 <Chique> Watchlist = what Dimit said above ^
  502. Dec 27 18:40:42 <FunkSoul> watchlist, who's going to update that much?
  503. Dec 27 18:40:45 <FunkSoul> idk
  504. Dec 27 18:40:46 <iKaLeD> i agree on watchlist as well yeah why not
  505. Dec 27 18:40:48 <Nervous> mods
  506. Dec 27 18:40:50 * Dusty looks around
  507. Dec 27 18:40:56 <FunkSoul> and where are you going to get mods from?
  508. Dec 27 18:40:58 <Dusty> gg, not a mod
  509. Dec 27 18:41:00 <Chique> Mods who can do the work. If they can't change the mod. (Different topic)
  510. Dec 27 18:41:00 <FunkSoul> ^
  511. Dec 27 18:41:02 <Shadow> Each mod should handle his group watch list
  512. Dec 27 18:41:07 <Shadow> and update it
  513. Dec 27 18:41:18 <Chique> Then shadow it's essentially all group BL once again
  514. Dec 27 18:41:24 <FunkSoul> nana, how about each mod on that board be assigned each duty
  515. Dec 27 18:41:43 <FunkSoul> some people for BLs, some people for that etc
  516. Dec 27 18:41:57 <Dusty> to be fair
  517. Dec 27 18:42:02 <Chique> As far as I've understood, your watchlist means group blacklists now
  518. Dec 27 18:42:05 <FunkSoul> but the blacklist topic needs some seriously active bros
  519. Dec 27 18:42:10 <Dusty> BL is pretty much the only topic that needs frequent updating
  520. Dec 27 18:42:16 <FunkSoul> ^ that
  521. Dec 27 18:42:20 <FunkSoul> gg dust
  522. Dec 27 18:42:22 <Chique> ?
  523. Dec 27 18:42:24 <dimt> nono chique with watchlist i meant
  524. Dec 27 18:42:42 <dimt> ppl who arnt fully restricted like ppl in the LAW bl but people which all leaders should be aware of (like grouphoppers)
  525. Dec 27 18:43:02 <Chique> So it's like our group blacklists, as far as I can understand?
  526. Dec 27 18:43:02 <Nervous> khazix
  527. Dec 27 18:43:07 <Chique> If Khazix is BL'd in SAPD
  528. Dec 27 18:43:12 <Chique> I suggest you guys all to be aware of him
  529. Dec 27 18:43:13 <Randp> thank you god nervous
  530. Dec 27 18:43:16 <Randp> really hate that guy
  531. Dec 27 18:43:18 <Chique> but not dangerous enough to be in Law BL
  532. Dec 27 18:43:19 <FunkSoul> same
  533. Dec 27 18:43:21 <Nervous> haha
  534. Dec 27 18:43:24 <FunkSoul> huehuehe
  535. Dec 27 18:43:27 <Chique> Is this what you mean Dimit?
  536. Dec 27 18:43:32 <iKaLeD> Khazix BLed in TF as well right?
  537. Dec 27 18:43:40 <dimt> this way all leaders have access to the information about an applicant who is potentially harmful, but still the ability to decide wether or not to accept
  538. Dec 27 18:44:06 <Chique> Dimit, I have some questions
  539. Dec 27 18:44:08 <Shadow> <dimt> just making other ppl aware of whats going on with the applicant and having a small talk with them so they have all rquired information ---- <dimt> who are not bad enough to be in the LAW bl but stupid enough that other leaders need to know about his stupidity
  540. Dec 27 18:44:11 <Nervous> we all check serials and information about the applicant
  541. Dec 27 18:44:17 <Nervous> so it won't be a problem
  542. Dec 27 18:44:21 <Chique> Let me ask them
  543. Dec 27 18:44:30 <Tomukas> some people don't know how to check serials properly
  544. Dec 27 18:44:36 <Tomukas> you know I could just re-install MTA to change my serial
  545. Dec 27 18:44:37 <FunkSoul> Look, people who know the trollers should regularly update the BL topic then
  546. Dec 27 18:45:22 <Chique> 1. If you want someone's name in the watchlist, it automatically means he should be blacklisted in your own group, right?
  547. Dec 27 18:45:40 <Chique> (Otherwise why would you want other groups to be "aware")
  548. Dec 27 18:45:44 <FunkSoul> ^
  549. Dec 27 18:45:47 <Dusty> uhhhh
  550. Dec 27 18:45:54 * Class has quit (Read error)
  551. Dec 27 18:46:00 <dimt> probably but thats not rly the mainr eason behind it
  552. Dec 27 18:46:13 <FunkSoul> so technically, people in TF,SAPD,AF,FBI,USNS blacklist are in the watchlist?
  553. Dec 27 18:46:18 <Dusty> well, if you think said person is just a dumb fuck overall, but doesn't reall deserve a watch list
  554. Dec 27 18:46:19 <dimt> the idea is to help stopping ppl from hopping through the whole alliance before going to LAW BL
  555. Dec 27 18:46:27 * Prototype|AFKfor15mins is now known as Prototype
  556. Dec 27 18:46:33 <Chique> So can there be a case, where someone is in watchlist (USNS requested), but not in USNS BL?
  557. Dec 27 18:46:43 <dimt> as u know the ppl in LAW BL usually have hopped through all groups multiple times already until everyone noticed what they are doing by himself
  558. Dec 27 18:46:53 <Chique> So can there be a case, where someone is in watchlist (USNS requested), but not in USNS BL?
  559. Dec 27 18:47:00 <dimt> well chique but when i notice someone who is hopping but wasnt in my group before
  560. Dec 27 18:47:03 <FunkSoul> One guy I have an eye on is JameS as well
  561. Dec 27 18:47:10 <Dusty> NO
  562. Dec 27 18:47:11 <Chique> Can we stop with the names?
  563. Dec 27 18:47:12 <dimt> then its rather unlikely that he goes to our personal group blacklist
  564. Dec 27 18:47:15 <FunkSoul> k :c
  565. Dec 27 18:47:23 <Dusty> khazix has to be the very first member of this exclusive list
  566. Dec 27 18:47:27 * Class (Class@cit-51E84320.range81-157.btcentralplus.com) has joined
  567. Dec 27 18:47:31 <Shadow> lol
  568. Dec 27 18:47:33 <FunkSoul> ye
  569. Dec 27 18:47:42 <Dusty> even I remember this idiot
  570. Dec 27 18:47:43 <Chique> Dimit, so that guy whom you want to put in watchlist, has to be in some group's watchlist?
  571. Dec 27 18:47:52 <Chique> Can there be a case where someone is in watchlist, but in none's BL?
  572. Dec 27 18:48:10 <Chique> some group's BL I meant*
  573. Dec 27 18:48:13 <Nervous> Chique you won't find group's watchlists
  574. Dec 27 18:48:16 <dimt> well chique its pretty much just a list of names like for example "keep an eye on this guy he seems to be group hopping"
  575. Dec 27 18:48:23 <Nervous> ^^
  576. Dec 27 18:48:25 <Chique> Please answer yes / no
  577. Dec 27 18:48:26 <Nervous> ^^^^
  578. Dec 27 18:48:37 <dimt> mmh no i think they dont neccessarsily have to be in BL already
  579. Dec 27 18:48:39 <Chique> Can there be a case where someone is in watchlist, but isn't there in any group's BL?
  580. Dec 27 18:48:45 <Dusty> yes
  581. Dec 27 18:48:52 <Nervous> yes
  582. Dec 27 18:48:53 <dimt> just think of henry the extreme hopper, i think he wasnt in mine nor in SAPDs bl before he got added to LAW BL
  583. Dec 27 18:49:00 <iKaLeD> yes
  584. Dec 27 18:49:03 <Chique> Okay understood
  585. Dec 27 18:49:11 <Chique> So I was thinking of watchlist = Aggregation of group BLs
  586. Dec 27 18:49:17 <Chique> so it's not, that answers the question
  587. Dec 27 18:49:19 <Nervous> Dusty are you ig?
  588. Dec 27 18:49:27 <Dusty> no
  589. Dec 27 18:49:32 <Nervous> can you go ig?
  590. Dec 27 18:49:41 <FunkSoul> i expect a no xd
  591. Dec 27 18:49:53 <Chique> So what did we decide for this topic? A watchlist and a BL right?
  592. Dec 27 18:50:04 <Shadow> yes
  593. Dec 27 18:50:05 <Nervous> yes chique
  594. Dec 27 18:50:10 <Chique> And rule should be -> A group requests / Other groups vote. Voting decides the result.
  595. Dec 27 18:50:12 <Class> Sounds good.
  596. Dec 27 18:50:21 <Chique> Same rule for blacklist appeals as well.
  597. Dec 27 18:50:26 <FunkSoul> When will that group request?
  598. Dec 27 18:50:31 <dimt> aslo we need to stop removing ppl there all the time, especially so early
  599. Dec 27 18:50:31 <iKaLeD> yeah i agree,that's perfect
  600. Dec 27 18:50:45 <Nervous> who can add this?
  601. Dec 27 18:50:50 <FunkSoul> 1 year duration for khazix was :fp: xd
  602. Dec 27 18:50:51 <Nervous> the watchlist
  603. Dec 27 18:50:53 <dimt> the ppl who get added there have been doing harm over a timespan of years, and then we try to remove them already after a few months, makes the whjole BL kinda pointkless
  604. Dec 27 18:50:53 <Chique> Dimit there has to be a rule of minimum time before someone can appeal
  605. Dec 27 18:51:00 <Chique> Otherwise every group has the right to vote whatever they want
  606. Dec 27 18:51:07 <Chique> And everyone has the right to appeal
  607. Dec 27 18:51:33 <FunkSoul> I agree with Chique
  608. Dec 27 18:51:39 <iKaLeD> appeal of BL removal?
  609. Dec 27 18:51:42 <FunkSoul> Ye
  610. Dec 27 18:51:43 <Chique> Yes
  611. Dec 27 18:51:56 <Chique> then make it like can't be appealed before 2 years from being added
  612. Dec 27 18:52:02 <Chique> or whatever time period ^
  613. Dec 27 18:52:08 <Dusty> <dimt> the ppl who get added there have been doing harm over a timespan of years, and then we try to remove them already after a few months, makes the whjole BL kinda pointkless
  614. Dec 27 18:52:11 <Dusty> which is why7
  615. Dec 27 18:52:17 <FunkSoul> 2 years is a lot
  616. Dec 27 18:52:23 <Dusty> how about we make all BL entries perma
  617. Dec 27 18:52:26 <iKaLeD> they can pay for us to be removed from LAW blacklist or no?
  618. Dec 27 18:52:31 <Chique> NO
  619. Dec 27 18:52:34 <Chique> Wtf kaled?
  620. Dec 27 18:52:36 <dimt> nope kaled lmao we are not swat
  621. Dec 27 18:52:36 <FunkSoul> ...
  622. Dec 27 18:52:38 <Nervous> no kaled
  623. Dec 27 18:52:39 <Dusty> but certain ones can be appealed after a certain time
  624. Dec 27 18:52:39 <FunkSoul> LOL
  625. Dec 27 18:52:41 <Nervous> you are crazy
  626. Dec 27 18:52:44 <Dusty> kaled u on crack or wat
  627. Dec 27 18:52:48 <FunkSoul> hhhh
  628. Dec 27 18:52:48 <Prototype> Lol kaled :D
  629. Dec 27 18:52:50 <dimt> right now the current summary is that khazix already caused considerable disruption in swat and tf (and probably mroe groups i dont knwo about)
  630. Dec 27 18:52:50 <iKaLeD> calm down lol i'm just asking
  631. Dec 27 18:52:59 <Chique> in SAPD too Dimit
  632. Dec 27 18:53:01 <FunkSoul> SAPD too
  633. Dec 27 18:53:03 <iKaLeD> i apologize,i was asking
  634. Dec 27 18:53:06 <Chique> so Khazix should be in LAW BL
  635. Dec 27 18:53:07 <dimt> wow really? i didnt even notice gg
  636. Dec 27 18:53:13 <FunkSoul> gg
  637. Dec 27 18:53:14 <dimt> nono it was just an example
  638. Dec 27 18:53:19 <Chique> keeps annoying the shit
  639. Dec 27 18:53:22 <Nervous> he was in the law bl
  640. Dec 27 18:53:23 <FunkSoul> ^
  641. Dec 27 18:53:25 <Chique> Anyway Khazix is not the topic here
  642. Dec 27 18:53:27 <Nervous> idk if he still in the bl
  643. Dec 27 18:53:33 <dimt> or that other idiot who even evaded his LAW BL by using someone elses acc
  644. Dec 27 18:53:39 <Nervous> ok
  645. Dec 27 18:53:39 <Prototype> Khazix received extremely good chance to prove himself. We removed him from BL twice... Kicked once and let him prove him for 3rd fcking time. He still managed to screw it up
  646. Dec 27 18:53:43 <Nervous> topic 3. done
  647. Dec 27 18:53:47 <Chique> So what did we decide?
  648. Dec 27 18:53:49 <Prototype> Just wanted to say
  649. Dec 27 18:53:50 <Nervous> we will add t he watchlist
  650. Dec 27 18:53:52 <FunkSoul> lmao proto
  651. Dec 27 18:53:53 <iKaLeD> i have another person should be blacklisted,dimt knows him
  652. Dec 27 18:54:02 <iKaLeD> in LAW BL
  653. Dec 27 18:54:03 <Nervous> let's avoid talking
  654. Dec 27 18:54:05 <Nervous> of names
  655. Dec 27 18:54:10 <Nervous> we are talking about the system
  656. Dec 27 18:54:10 <FunkSoul> why dont you guys say that in the law BL topic?
  657. Dec 27 18:54:11 <Prototype> ye
  658. Dec 27 18:54:25 <Prototype> Can we move to 4th topic?
  659. Dec 27 18:54:27 <Nervous> we will add the watchlist with the BL list
  660. Dec 27 18:54:30 <Nervous> VOTE
  661. Dec 27 18:54:32 <Chique> I didn't understand the result of 3rd topic yet
  662. Dec 27 18:54:34 <FunkSoul> Agreed.
  663. Dec 27 18:54:44 <Prototype> What is watchlist?
  664. Dec 27 18:54:45 <Tomukas> agreed
  665. Dec 27 18:54:46 <iKaLeD> my vote is yes
  666. Dec 27 18:54:48 <Tomukas> lmao
  667. Dec 27 18:54:51 <Chique> Watchlist + BL list = agreed.
  668. Dec 27 18:54:55 <FunkSoul> Nervous summed it up, watchlist + BL @chiq
  669. Dec 27 18:55:02 <Chique> Question is, what are the rules? How someone is added? How someone is removed?
  670. Dec 27 18:55:13 <Nervous> that's the problem chique
  671. Dec 27 18:55:17 <Chique> So discuss
  672. Dec 27 18:55:19 <Tomukas> A group decides it
  673. Dec 27 18:55:19 <dimt> i guess when u can provide evidence that he is about to cause harm to the alliance
  674. Dec 27 18:55:20 <Nervous> when can we remove the name
  675. Dec 27 18:55:24 <dimt> repeated rulebreaker, grouphopper etc
  676. Dec 27 18:55:24 <Chique> Instead of talking garbage about names
  677. Dec 27 18:55:37 <Nervous> we will make some formats Chique
  678. Dec 27 18:55:44 <Chique> Ye that's basically a complaint report ^
  679. Dec 27 18:55:44 <dimt> anything which other leaders should know about before deciding wether to take them or not
  680. Dec 27 18:55:46 <FunkSoul> what will be in that format?
  681. Dec 27 18:55:54 <Nervous> proofs
  682. Dec 27 18:55:55 <Chique> So groups vote?
  683. Dec 27 18:55:55 <Nervous> names
  684. Dec 27 18:56:00 <dimt> i mean watchlist wont harm anyone its just giving other leaders some info they should know about
  685. Dec 27 18:56:10 <Chique> Watchlist is okay to be updated by anyone
  686. Dec 27 18:56:13 <iKaLeD> simply,groups can vote about it
  687. Dec 27 18:56:19 <Chique> What are the rules of BL?
  688. Dec 27 18:56:23 <FunkSoul> who will request it, from each group?
  689. Dec 27 18:56:27 <Chique> A group makes a complaint with evidences
  690. Dec 27 18:56:28 <Nervous> or a vote
  691. Dec 27 18:56:30 <Nervous> it can work too
  692. Dec 27 18:56:30 <Chique> Other groups vote right?
  693. Dec 27 18:56:32 <dimt> other leaders decisions dont get forced by a watch list it just lets them know what they wouldnt know wihtout it
  694. Dec 27 18:56:34 <iKaLeD> a vote imo
  695. Dec 27 18:56:41 <Nervous> SAPD agrees removing x guy from the watchlist
  696. Dec 27 18:56:46 <Chique> Yeah we are past the watchlist
  697. Dec 27 18:57:13 <Chique> Watchlist -> Add: Anyone can directly add. Remove: Voting by groups.
  698. Dec 27 18:57:15 <Prototype> Can someone tell me what is watch list?
  699. Dec 27 18:57:21 <Chique> Blacklist -> Add: Voting, Remove: Voting.
  700. Dec 27 18:57:23 <Chique> Am I correct?
  701. Dec 27 18:57:42 <dimt> or if you add a short time span to watch list
  702. Dec 27 18:57:44 <Chique> Watchlist = "A list of names to be aware of, who can cause problems"
  703. Dec 27 18:57:52 <iKaLeD> what do you mean by anyone can directly add
  704. Dec 27 18:58:05 <dimt> then its not needed to vote every time to remove something
  705. Dec 27 18:58:14 <Chique> So like a 6 months
  706. Dec 27 18:58:15 <Chique> ?
  707. Dec 27 18:58:18 <Nervous> it can work that
  708. Dec 27 18:58:21 <dimt> see if i spot someone hopping groups then its mabye relevant for 4 months
  709. Dec 27 18:58:35 <Chique> Yeah so decide a concrete time period right now
  710. Dec 27 18:58:37 <dimt> if hes not hopping anymore and the 4 months have expired then it would be fine to remove without voting i guess
  711. Dec 27 18:58:38 <Chique> 4 months? 6 months?
  712. Dec 27 18:58:41 <Prototype> Then watchlist needs to be checked regularly, at least twice or 3 times per week :x
  713. Dec 27 18:58:44 <Nervous> after that u will remove it without votes
  714. Dec 27 18:58:44 <dimt> we can still vote on permanent entries
  715. Dec 27 18:58:50 <dimt> well chique depending on their offence i guess
  716. Dec 27 18:59:01 <Chique> I think should be a fixed timeline Dimit
  717. Dec 27 18:59:04 <Chique> otherwise requires much effort
  718. Dec 27 18:59:07 <FunkSoul> 6 months.
  719. Dec 27 18:59:07 <Chique> to check variable timelines
  720. Dec 27 18:59:11 <dimt> if osmeone left 2 groups in 1 month its maybe not as sever as someone who was in all LAW groups recently
  721. Dec 27 18:59:17 <Nervous> y
  722. Dec 27 18:59:19 <Nervous> 3 months
  723. Dec 27 18:59:30 <Chique> I understand Dimit
  724. Dec 27 18:59:40 <Chique> but having variable time spans will be inefficient, slow to update
  725. Dec 27 18:59:46 <Chique> as multiple groups are involved
  726. Dec 27 18:59:54 <Nervous> we will check it per 3 months
  727. Dec 27 19:00:05 <Nervous> and we can make posts in the same topic
  728. Dec 27 19:00:10 <Nervous> we can mentions leaders
  729. Dec 27 19:00:18 <Nervous> and discuss about it
  730. Dec 27 19:00:25 <Chique> Uh, I was talking about, how long a person's name will be there from the date of addition
  731. Dec 27 19:00:35 <Chique> Before auto removal
  732. Dec 27 19:00:40 <FunkSoul> 6 months imo
  733. Dec 27 19:00:49 <FunkSoul> 4 is less, 6 seems fine
  734. Dec 27 19:00:52 <Chique> Which Dimit said "Depends", but I'll say "Should be fixed length"
  735. Dec 27 19:00:55 <Chique> Now you guys decide
  736. Dec 27 19:00:59 <Chique> I am okay with both
  737. Dec 27 19:01:13 <FunkSoul> 5 then?
  738. Dec 27 19:01:13 <Nervous> Depends
  739. Dec 27 19:01:18 <Chique> ok agreeing to Depends
  740. Dec 27 19:01:24 <Nervous> i agree with Depends too
  741. Dec 27 19:01:25 <FunkSoul> depends ok
  742. Dec 27 19:01:29 <FunkSoul> agreed
  743. Dec 27 19:01:34 <iKaLeD> depends
  744. Dec 27 19:01:35 <Nervous> 50% of this irc is sleeping
  745. Dec 27 19:01:39 <FunkSoul> ^
  746. Dec 27 19:01:40 <Class> ^
  747. Dec 27 19:01:42 <Chique> So Watchlist => Add: Directly by any group. Remove: Auto-removal after mentioned time period.
  748. Dec 27 19:01:55 <FunkSoul> agreed.
  749. Dec 27 19:01:56 <LeGe> there are too many people talking already lmao
  750. Dec 27 19:01:56 <Nervous> Yes
  751. Dec 27 19:01:57 <Prototype> Agreed
  752. Dec 27 19:02:01 <iKaLeD> yes i agree
  753. Dec 27 19:02:02 <LeGe> but agreed
  754. Dec 27 19:02:02 <Nervous> agreed
  755. Dec 27 19:02:07 <Chique> Now Blacklist => Add: Group complaints, other group votes. Remove: Person appeals, all groups vote.
  756. Dec 27 19:02:08 <FunkSoul> gg then
  757. Dec 27 19:02:13 <Nervous> I don't have more topics
  758. Dec 27 19:02:19 <FunkSoul> agreed.
  759. Dec 27 19:02:25 <Chique> @Dimit?
  760. Dec 27 19:02:30 <iKaLeD> can i state my idea?
  761. Dec 27 19:02:36 <Chique> sure I guess
  762. Dec 27 19:02:37 <MHP> sleeping cus of the topic
  763. Dec 27 19:02:39 <GanstaCJ> Wait, so now it's voting to add groups to BL?
  764. Dec 27 19:02:40 <MHP> blacklist = boring
  765. Dec 27 19:02:40 <Class> I kind of want a bit of elaboration from TaskForce if there's time
  766. Dec 27 19:02:58 <Chique> Gangsta what mate?
  767. Dec 27 19:03:07 <Tomukas> yes?
  768. Dec 27 19:03:09 <Prototype> What kind of elaboration?
  769. Dec 27 19:03:09 <FunkSoul> cj is a k1ng
  770. Dec 27 19:03:10 <Chique> We don't add groups to BL lol?
  771. Dec 27 19:03:11 <Nervous> the same voting ganstacj
  772. Dec 27 19:03:21 <Nervous> he wants to say
  773. Dec 27 19:03:22 <GanstaCJ> not groups lol
  774. Dec 27 19:03:26 <FunkSoul> cj ggez
  775. Dec 27 19:03:27 <GanstaCJ> I mean groups vote to add people to BL
  776. Dec 27 19:03:27 <Nervous> add names to the law bl i guess
  777. Dec 27 19:03:30 <GanstaCJ> My brain hurts
  778. Dec 27 19:03:33 <Chique> What I meant is, if SAPD wants someone to be in Law BL. We complaint on Law BL topic. All groups vote.
  779. Dec 27 19:03:37 <Chique> Does that explain?
  780. Dec 27 19:03:45 <GanstaCJ> Yea, sorry for confusing it hh
  781. Dec 27 19:03:46 <FunkSoul> yes, agreed.
  782. Dec 27 19:03:47 <GanstaCJ> my brain hurts
  783. Dec 27 19:03:52 <GanstaCJ> but I agree c:
  784. Dec 27 19:03:56 <Chique> jesus ok
  785. Dec 27 19:03:57 <FunkSoul> c:
  786. Dec 27 19:04:00 <Nervous> wait
  787. Dec 27 19:04:04 <Chique> Dimit is same AFK here as he is IG
  788. Dec 27 19:04:05 <Nervous> dmit can u add this
  789. Dec 27 19:04:13 <Nervous> dimt can you add this watchlist?
  790. Dec 27 19:04:14 <FunkSoul> ANSWER DIMIT\
  791. Dec 27 19:04:34 <GanstaCJ> I'll get him
  792. Dec 27 19:04:35 <iKaLeD> i have another topic to talk after this
  793. Dec 27 19:04:35 <GanstaCJ> one sec
  794. Dec 27 19:04:44 <Chique> Ye nervous if he doesn't I'll make the topic. So don't worry.
  795. Dec 27 19:04:48 <FunkSoul> brb ill get myself an orange then
  796. Dec 27 19:04:50 <Chique> Will also do the training topic.
  797. Dec 27 19:04:56 <Nervous> ok Chique and about the trainings per week
  798. Dec 27 19:05:01 <Nervous> should I take care about it
  799. Dec 27 19:05:04 <Chique> Will make the topic right after the meeting
  800. Dec 27 19:05:07 <Chique> Or if you want
  801. Dec 27 19:05:09 <Chique> you can sure
  802. Dec 27 19:05:14 <Tomukas> This is what Dusty posted
  803. Dec 27 19:05:14 <Tomukas> https://pastebin.com/raw/u1KYVF2s
  804. Dec 27 19:05:17 <Chique> Yeah saw
  805. Dec 27 19:05:21 <Tomukas> replied with*
  806. Dec 27 19:05:36 * Mousy has quit (Read error)
  807. Dec 27 19:05:40 <Chique> Needs the format code of the training after it, that's al is needed in the topic.
  808. Dec 27 19:05:43 <Chique> all*
  809. Dec 27 19:06:01 <Nervous> I will talk with Dusty about the topic of trainings per week
  810. Dec 27 19:06:08 <Nervous> Chique you will take care the watchlist
  811. Dec 27 19:06:12 <Nervous> with Dmit
  812. Dec 27 19:06:17 <Nervous> or idk who the fuck is his name
  813. Dec 27 19:06:29 <Chique> Okay, but anything left to discuss about Training topic?
  814. Dec 27 19:06:29 <Nervous> ikaled
  815. Dec 27 19:06:37 <iKaLeD> yes i'll state my idea now
  816. Dec 27 19:06:39 <Nervous> can i change my pc
  817. Dec 27 19:06:54 <Chique> Needs list of groups as Dusty already wrote + Training report code -> Fields are {hosting group, participants SS, explanation of training}
  818. Dec 27 19:06:55 <Nervous> coming back in 2 minutes
  819. Dec 27 19:06:59 <iKaLeD> about changing LAW Alliance moderators?
  820. Dec 27 19:07:11 * Nervous has quit (Quit: http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client)
  821. Dec 27 19:07:12 <Chique> Ye please do
  822. Dec 27 19:07:13 * Prototype has quit (Read error)
  823. Dec 27 19:07:35 <Chique> I suggest give moderators to people who are not moderators in their own group
  824. Dec 27 19:07:36 <iKaLeD> anvenger,Vandam and sick not doing anything as i see
  825. Dec 27 19:07:42 * Prototype (Prototype@87E8A173.87EFC86A.C1BC138E.IP) has joined
  826. Dec 27 19:08:00 <Dusty> good idea
  827. Dec 27 19:08:03 <Chique> This way people who are managing their own board won't have to spend time.
  828. Dec 27 19:09:11 <Chique> Anything else we are discussing?
  829. Dec 27 19:09:16 <iKaLeD> those people who are not moderators in their groups got experience how to mod?
  830. Dec 27 19:09:28 <iKaLeD> i don't think so
  831. Dec 27 19:09:29 <Prototype> Me for sure
  832. Dec 27 19:09:37 <Prototype> Nvm :fp:
  833. Dec 27 19:09:43 <Chique> Kaled then don't add those who don't have experience
  834. Dec 27 19:09:46 <Chique> simple as that
  835. Dec 27 19:09:50 <Chique> Add only those who can manage
  836. Dec 27 19:09:59 <iKaLeD> yeah
  837. Dec 27 19:10:04 <Chique> By managing it just needs updating BL topic lol
  838. Dec 27 19:10:07 <Chique> And maybe locking some topics
  839. Dec 27 19:10:30 <GanstaCJ> wait, why can't the mods just be a few leaders of each group
  840. Dec 27 19:10:44 <Chique> Because they are already managing their own group
  841. Dec 27 19:10:51 <Chique> This results in lack of interest moderating law board
  842. Dec 27 19:10:54 <Chique> as we can see right now
  843. Dec 27 19:11:04 <Chique> Which brought us to this topic, and you all shouting "BL is outdated"
  844. Dec 27 19:11:43 <FunkSoul> a
  845. Dec 27 19:11:49 <GanstaCJ> b
  846. Dec 27 19:11:50 <iKaLeD> do you agree to change the current LAW alliance mods?
  847. Dec 27 19:11:55 <Chique> I agree
  848. Dec 27 19:11:58 <iKaLeD> not all of them,the inactive ones
  849. Dec 27 19:12:00 <FunkSoul> ye
  850. Dec 27 19:12:03 <LeGe> yup
  851. Dec 27 19:12:06 <iKaLeD> such as vandam and sick
  852. Dec 27 19:12:07 <GanstaCJ> sure
  853. Dec 27 19:12:17 <iKaLeD> avenger too
  854. Dec 27 19:12:19 <Chique> And me too
  855. Dec 27 19:12:43 <iKaLeD> nervous? dimt? Dusty? etc..
  856. Dec 27 19:12:49 <iKaLeD> what do you think about it
  857. Dec 27 19:12:52 <GanstaCJ> dimit is afk
  858. Dec 27 19:12:58 <FunkSoul> ....................
  859. Dec 27 19:12:59 <GanstaCJ> can't get his attention :c
  860. Dec 27 19:13:07 <Chique> pathetic
  861. Dec 27 19:13:15 <FunkSoul> pathetic
  862. Dec 27 19:13:20 <GanstaCJ> rude :c
  863. Dec 27 19:13:21 <Aztech> y get him out of here
  864. Dec 27 19:13:22 <MHP> pathalogical
  865. Dec 27 19:13:31 <Chique> @Nervous do we have anything else to discuss?
  866. Dec 27 19:13:39 <LeGe> nervous is not here atm
  867. Dec 27 19:13:41 <dimt> yes
  868. Dec 27 19:13:45 <GanstaCJ> Nervous reconnected
  869. Dec 27 19:13:57 <dimt> i think the moderators are rather unimportant as long as they are kinda active
  870. Dec 27 19:13:58 <iKaLeD> that's my idea
  871. Dec 27 19:14:06 <dimt> idk why avenger is even a moderator there
  872. Dec 27 19:14:24 <iKaLeD> asking my self the same question too
  873. Dec 27 19:14:39 <Class> Well it's always been the top leaders of each groups hasn't it
  874. Dec 27 19:14:44 <Class> So I guess he just got added over time
  875. Dec 27 19:14:46 <FunkSoul> ye
  876. Dec 27 19:14:46 <iKaLeD> he didn't attend this meeting as well,i have checked his post on forums that he will attend
  877. Dec 27 19:14:47 <Chique> Yes ^ that's why Avenger is there
  878. Dec 27 19:15:03 <iKaLeD> Vandam as well and sick
  879. Dec 27 19:15:04 <Class> Like not a big deal, past is gone and done. Just focus on getting em' changed
  880. Dec 27 19:15:14 <Class> They were added, they did nothing, move on and change
  881. Dec 27 19:15:14 <iKaLeD> both of them are inactive
  882. Dec 27 19:15:17 <Class> we get the point mate
  883. Dec 27 19:15:18 <Chique> Yeah remove them, also me. Give it to more active people.
  884. Dec 27 19:15:38 <iKaLeD> yes
  885. Dec 27 19:15:52 <iKaLeD> maybe creating a topic of LAW alliance board about it?
  886. Dec 27 19:16:00 <Chique> Sure, Kaled you can do it
  887. Dec 27 19:16:04 <Chique> By suggesting a few names
  888. Dec 27 19:16:06 <Chique> whom you think can replace
  889. Dec 27 19:16:09 <Chique> the ones inactive
  890. Dec 27 19:16:11 <iKaLeD> request to be added on LAW alliance mod
  891. Dec 27 19:17:04 <iKaLeD> i'll ask every trusted member in law alliance group about it
  892. Dec 27 19:17:11 <iKaLeD> he can take this role or no
  893. Dec 27 19:17:31 <Chique> So 1. Weekly training, 2. Watchlist + BL, 3. Changing inactive mods
  894. Dec 27 19:17:36 <Chique> Anything else I'm missing?
  895. Dec 27 19:17:42 <MHP> yes
  896. Dec 27 19:17:48 <MHP> you have to reveal SAPD's topic
  897. Dec 27 19:17:50 <FunkSoul> promting me
  898. Dec 27 19:17:56 <Chique> -_-?
  899. Dec 27 19:17:59 <FunkSoul> missed it
  900. Dec 27 19:17:59 <Dusty> hi
  901. Dec 27 19:17:59 <GanstaCJ> lol
  902. Dec 27 19:18:02 <GanstaCJ> hi
  903. Dec 27 19:18:05 <FunkSoul> hi
  904. Dec 27 19:18:13 <Chique> I want to ask about a proposition though
  905. Dec 27 19:18:21 <GanstaCJ> wot
  906. Dec 27 19:18:21 <MHP> SAPD will be renaming itself to SPUD
  907. Dec 27 19:18:26 <Prototype> is meeting over now?
  908. Dec 27 19:18:26 <FunkSoul> y
  909. Dec 27 19:18:27 * Nervous (Nervous@C5F6CD86.DD1C49E9.1930BBCE.IP) has joined
  910. Dec 27 19:18:27 <Chique> What do you guys think of adding a group like "BNA" to the alliance?
  911. Dec 27 19:18:32 <Nervous> back
  912. Dec 27 19:18:33 <LeGe> wb Nervous
  913. Dec 27 19:18:36 <Nervous> no chique
  914. Dec 27 19:18:36 <GanstaCJ> BNA is in alliance with MI6
  915. Dec 27 19:18:42 <Chique> ok No it is
  916. Dec 27 19:18:42 <Dusty> what is a BNA?
  917. Dec 27 19:18:45 <Chique> nvm
  918. Dec 27 19:18:47 <FunkSoul> hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
  919. Dec 27 19:18:50 <Chique> already decided
  920. Dec 27 19:18:50 <Class> Lol
  921. Dec 27 19:18:54 <Class> No thanks
  922. Dec 27 19:18:54 <Randp> <Dusty> what is a BNA?
  923. Dec 27 19:18:56 <Randp> <Dusty> what is a BNA?
  924. Dec 27 19:18:57 <Randp> .
  925. Dec 27 19:18:59 <FunkSoul> hhhhhhhhh
  926. Dec 27 19:19:03 <FunkSoul> omggg
  927. Dec 27 19:19:05 <GanstaCJ> Dusty, a group c:
  928. Dec 27 19:19:06 <Chique> So 1. Weekly training, 2. Watchlist + BL, 3. Changing inactive mods
  929. Dec 27 19:19:09 <MHP> Randp consider yourself warned!
  930. Dec 27 19:19:10 <FunkSoul> BNANAs
  931. Dec 27 19:19:11 <Chique> Nervous you got anything else?
  932. Dec 27 19:19:14 <Nervous> today i had a problem with the DIR
  933. Dec 27 19:19:19 <Nervous> of bna
  934. Dec 27 19:19:23 <Nervous> he said that we stole his academy
  935. Dec 27 19:19:26 <Chique> Phorpride?
  936. Dec 27 19:19:27 <FunkSoul> ...
  937. Dec 27 19:19:27 <Randp> Yes guys
  938. Dec 27 19:19:29 <Nervous> Yes
  939. Dec 27 19:19:29 <Randp> I got
  940. Dec 27 19:19:30 <GanstaCJ> what academy
  941. Dec 27 19:19:32 <Chique> Thanks Nervous
  942. Dec 27 19:19:34 <Chique> we all hate that guy
  943. Dec 27 19:19:35 <Randp> oh ok Nervous go ahead
  944. Dec 27 19:19:37 <Dusty> lol wut
  945. Dec 27 19:19:38 <Nervous> The FBI Academy
  946. Dec 27 19:19:43 <dimt> bna leaders come out of inactivity and boost activity hard core for some weeks
  947. Dec 27 19:19:46 <Nervous> Dusty read FBI staffs
  948. Dec 27 19:19:49 <Dusty> we like invited academies
  949. Dec 27 19:19:51 <Chique> 0 fucks given if you stole
  950. Dec 27 19:19:52 <dimt> then blame all others for "being inactive" or "not working properly"
  951. Dec 27 19:19:55 <Chique> Tell that to him
  952. Dec 27 19:19:57 <FunkSoul> he's 17 bros
  953. Dec 27 19:20:02 <iKaLeD> why brining BNA here?
  954. Dec 27 19:20:05 <Nervous> IDK Why xb0x added him in FBI's whitelist
  955. Dec 27 19:20:07 <iKaLeD> this is important?
  956. Dec 27 19:20:09 <Nervous> but ok
  957. Dec 27 19:20:15 <Nervous> i don't have more topics
  958. Dec 27 19:20:16 <Nervous> that's all
  959. Dec 27 19:20:21 <Chique> Okay so 3 topics
  960. Dec 27 19:20:22 <iKaLeD> same i don't have more topics
  961. Dec 27 19:20:25 <Nervous> i would like to wish you a happy new year
  962. Dec 27 19:20:29 <Chique> you too
  963. Dec 27 19:20:30 <Nervous> enjoy with your family
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement