Induction from Bad Smell

Induction from Bad Smell
------------------------

Because the academia can qualify bad smell as pure evil[1], there is a rational reason to inductively argue that feminisation of men is also pure evil on the condition that no known medical procedure makes male-to-female transsexuals smell like women. However, the domain of the context of these definitions is different in the sense that to define feminisation of men as pure evil requires at least metaphysics of supremacy whereas to define bad smell as pure evil is a simpler definition in the sense of being facilitated by a subjective metaphysics.

No metaphysics facilitates supremacy if the coordinates of all of its subdomains have the same sign in the Aldiode.
Not facilitating supremacy facilitates a greater degree of innocence, but innocence isn't necessarily good.

In order to differentiate between these two definitions it appears appropriate to define bad smell as subjectively pure badness instead of pure evil. This definition, however, insinuates that the academia at large is unable to attribute agency to negative moral value despite expressing a preference for metaphysical objects over metaphysical waveforms. So the academia appears to manifest inconsistent values. Why else would it clearly signal a preference for neutrality yet actually favour metaphysics of objects over metaphysics of waveforms, except if it gets to use the trigonometric functions sin, cos and tan and their derivatives?

If we were to use Freudian psychology in order to answer this question, the answer would pertain to the anal stage, but this would again associate the academia itself to something whose value includes an object whose value is purely negative.

[1] https://pastebin.com/dXChuaMK