Advertisement
Guest User

Dune In Hindi 720p

a guest
Sep 18th, 2018
41
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.78 KB | None | 0 0
  1.  
  2.  
  3. ********************
  4. Dune In Hindi 720p
  5. http://urllio.com/qzd4a
  6. (Copy & Paste link)
  7. ********************
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11.  
  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
  15.  
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31.  
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39.  
  40.  
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44.  
  45.  
  46. A Duke's son leads desert warriors against the galactic emperor and his father's evil nemesis when they assassinate his father and free their desert world from the emperor's rule.
  47. In the far future, a duke and his family are sent by the Emperor to a sand world from which comes a spice that is essential for interstellar travel. The move is designed to destroy the duke and his family, but his son escapes and seeks revenge as he uses the world's ecology as one of his weapons.
  48. I read the book, but years after watching the movie. Free yourself from all the details and don't compare it to the book. This movie is an epic masterpiece! Maybe it has such a low rating because of all the booklovers over- criticizing. Don' t let that stop you from watching it. It will give you the shivers....in a good way.
  49. When I first saw Dune I knew I was seeing something special. It is the only science fiction film that creates such a unique and different world that you could actually believe it existing someday. I rank Dune up there with sci-fi greats such as 2001: A Space Odyssey, Star Wars, Metropolis, and Blade Runner.<br/><br/>I know that when Dune was released it received mixed reviews, and failed at the US box office. Yet this film is much better than the usual sci-fi fluff, and it&#39;s originality can be pointed to the great David Lynch. I&#39;ve read that had the film not failed he was going to direct two sequels. But it was considered a failure then, and now he refuses to talk about. Hopefully someday Universal will allow him to re-cut Dune to his liking, but I believe that the theatrical cut most likely was his cut.<br/><br/>If you pay attention to Dune you&#39;ll see one of the most thought provoking and inspiring films ever made. Beautifully shot and wonderfully acted with special effects that enhance the film, and don&#39;t take it over like the recent mini-series. And yes I have read the book, and I liked it just as much. (10/10)
  50. Dune is a huge, hollow, imaginative and cold sci-fi epic. Visually unique and teeming with incident, David Lynch's film holds the interest due to its abundant surface attractions but won't, of its own accord, create the sort of fanaticism which has made Frank Herbert's 1965 novel one of the all-time favorites in its genre.
  51. Nowhere. It just does not exist. The closest we have to David Lynch&#39;s original vision is the theatrical release. Some people sometimes refer to the extended TV cut as the &quot;director&#39;s cut&quot; (and some even dare to offer copies of it in various auction sites under that label), but that couldn&#39;t be further removed from reality, as that version was rejected by Lynch to the point of deleting his name from the credits. A legal DVD of Dune: The Director&#39;s Cut exists, but that&#39;s for the 2000 Sci-Fi Channel miniseries, not this film.<br/><br/>However, the cast and crew of Lynch&#39;s Dune have confirmed that Lynch showed them an &#39;assembly cut&#39; of the film shortly after principal photography wrapped. Although the film had yet to go through post-production, the reaction was very positive. This cut has not been seen since (as is the case with most assembly cuts).<br/><br/>There is also a fan version available, that attempts to get closer to both the novel and David Lynch&#39;s original vision: http://www.fanedit.org/ifdb/412-dune-the-alternative-edition-redux It&#39;s &quot;Backyard&quot; by Emmett Chapman, included on his album Parallel Galaxy. Chapman was also the creator of the instrument (known as the Chapman Stick) that Gurney plays, repainted and with an added lower part to represent the Baliset described by Frank Herbert in the original novel. Herbert was very complimentary towards the film, impressed that Lynch had managed to include so much from his novel in such a short time. He did, however, take a small issue with the portrayal of Paul as having become a literal god-figure at the end. Both versions contain footage that&#39;s missing in the other one, but the Theatrical Version lacks way more footage. Furthermore several scenes have been removed and reinserted afterwards in the TV Version, some of them are edited differently. But these differences aren&#39;t mentioned in this comparison because it would break the mold. David Lychn&#39;s version is the Theatrical Version btw. He wasn&#39;t involved in the TV Version and ordered that his name in the opening credits was going to be replaced by Alan Smithee . The main difference in the two versions is the fact that the TV Version has been split up to smaller episodes. As a result of that, the movie doesn&#39;t look like a motion picture anymore but like a big TV production. a5c7b9f00b
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement