8 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-06-17 1435 +Tachyon TIME LORD

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-06-17 1435 +Tachyon TIME LORD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVU6ghBqJG0&lc=z12dsrfhfnz4znmas04cdp0bapatftnhqs40k
https://pastebin.com/yaHARX3m
__


+Tachyon TIME LORD __ Please try to understand this reply. You would like it to be a "deductive argument" but it remains inductive. And it does not follow. If I can make tables and chairs out of wood is it really a logical progression that I can eventually make a house? Whatever analogy you come up with - it will fail. _Because none of the "former things" are of the *same form* as the "thing" in question that is to "follow"._ (I'm not confident that distinction will be understood - but it doesn't matter.)







The reason you are doing this is because *you already accept* that the "ISS" is possible *and can already imagine* it to be real and manned. That is why it seems like a matter of "deduction" (though it remains inductive). *The consequence of this mental "trap" is that you become powerless to resist believing*. That is why it seems like a logical progression from planes to satellites to Moon missions to the "ISS". That is why the analogy makes sense to you _and my objection to it will likely be misunderstood._







You are also replying to me as though I am someone who rejects the "ISS" - or - perhaps more accurately - as someone who simply needs "a helping hand" [+nps!] to imagine it's true. I am not asserting there is no real and manned "ISS" and I am not without an imagination.







With regard to the alleged "ISS" - and it is just this simple:- _you accept it is possible and have found a way to imagine it is true._ It is a point that cannot be repeated enough: *You have not seen sufficient proof of the alleged "ISS" [no one has!] - any more than you have seen sufficient proof of "Human Echolocation" [no one has!]*. It is just that you can accept one of the claims as being rooted in the possible and can imagine it to be true _whereas you cannot with the other._







*Neither claim comes with "sufficient proof"* [not that upon scrutiny qualifies] which means *no one's belief in it is justified* and *that* is the issue. >>> It may well be true that there is a real and manned "ISS"! <<< _But we are not justified in believing it._ It may well be true that there is a skill called "human echolocation"! _But we are not justified in believing it._







*Lie system events and claims always lack sufficient proof (that which necessarily proves an event/claim to be true and thus permits us to justify a belief) and this is done intentionally and systematically*. This is how a population is made to believe any old mindblow bullsh!t it wants - _like "human echolocation"._







This is why every "normal person" will believe "human echolocation" upon hearing/learning about it. Because they can accept it's possible and imagine it's true. Why? Because the "BBC" wouldn't report on it otherwise! *It's just that you do not share the same trust in the "BBC" and so for you it is not accepted as possible (or imagined to be true)*.







This is not about the "ISS". This is not about "Human Echolocation". (In the absence of sufficient proof either belief is *equally* justified!) *Rather, it is all about the population being forced to use their imagination to fill in the blanks* - so that each person ends up convincing himself/herself of each event or claim. Just as you have done with your analogy. I am trying to help you to see that.


__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w