Factors such as age, gender, and class were all influential on the survival rate of passengers. In question 2, the relative frequency calculations displayed that passengers who were female were more likely to survive compared to males. This continued to hold true through the latter questions, such as in Question 4. Both a two-proportion and chi-squared test was carried out for question 4, both of which resulted in a rejection of the Null Hypothesis, therefore demonstrating that gender and survival are dependent on each other. As well, class and survival proved to be dependent on each other, as was demonstrated in question 3. We see that passengers who were in Class 1 had a higher chance of survival than those in Class 3. Along with those categorical variables being dependent, it's also demonstrated that survival was also dependent on class and age. In Question 5, it's shown that children had the highest rate of survival according to the contingency table, showing that age played a role on survival rate. When women and children were grouped, it was displayed that they had a higher rate of survival than adult men through a two-proportion test. As well, question 6 supported the idea that the likelihood of survival increased with the younger the passenger was, as the elderly individuals were the group who were least likely to survive. As a whole, it can be concluded that of genders, women had a higher survival rate than men. Of classes, those in Class 1 had a higher survival rate than those in Class 3. Of ages, those who were younger had a higher chance of surviving than those who were older.