They Lied About Atlantis

Solon, said to be Plato's ancestor, was given an account of the days of Atlantis by the priests of Egypt, as well as confirmation of a cycle of cataclysms which destroyed all records from before 11,500 years ago (or ~9kya from their time).

Which MEANS that the Egyptians are on record saying that they KNOW writing was invented well before 9,000BC, that human record-keeping once went back as far as nearly 100,000 years if not longer (considering the time elapse from one cataclysm to another, which could be 11,000-26,000 years from what I've read, with 3-5 known species level cataclysms based on various ancient sources).

The idea that we were exclusively hunter-gatherers until civilization was "invented" 10,000ish years ago, is patently false. Hunting and gathering was instead an adaptation that came after the loss of civilization, agriculture, animal husbandry, and record keeping. We did not invent civilization (or almost anything for that matter); instead we inherited it and it was taught to us by the "gods of old."

[Edit: adaptation might be a misnomer. If the Anunnaki myths are credible, then we inherited hunter-gatherer instincts from the homo erectus side of our genes, reverting back to them when man was left to survive alone without the gods after the first cataclysm.]

On a side note, this might explain how the Dogon tribe was aware of the Sirius system's multiple stars, despite lacking the technology necessary to see such a thing. In fact, it might help explain a lot about ancient astronomical claims which could not be "proven" again until modern times.

Read Plato's records here, under chapter 2:
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/atlantida_mu/atlantis/index.htm

Atlantis was not "futuristic" compared to today's cities. It was more like ancient Egyptian level architecture/technology but a few tiers higher. More advanced than our age in their own ways, but to what extent is unknown aside from sources claiming they used borderline magic based on things like geometry and frequency.

Atlantis would have been a degraded version of the civilizations that were destroyed by cataclysms before it. Every cataclysm, the descendents of man lose more and more knowledge and history. So this is not to say that even older civs did not have the ability to leave the Earth. I think it's pretty clear that someone was able to do that at some point, but probably not by the time Atlantis was built. Remember Atlantis was built by the kingdom of Enki, and several whole cycles after the gods Enki and Enlil waged their war across the continents.

Furthermore, Atlantis was not a single island in the Atlantic ocean, but was instead a globe-faring civilization with derivatives of its architectures being seen in Egypt, Peru, India, China, and possibly more. They likely had cities off of many major ports.

Funny thing about deluges; anything on a coast is going to be demolished. Funny thing about ancient big cities is, usually you're going to want to build them near a coast. Funny how that all works out. Might adequately explain why artifacts and ruins are hard to come by.

Well, that, and intentional coverups by the monolithic world shadow government, and their special ops forces like ISIS going around destroying all the artifacts from Mesopotamia that might have left some clues. Sigh. And yes they own the academia. So, get mad with me. Get real fuckin' mad until the legacy rape stops.

It's all our history y'know, not just mine or yours. We've all been deprived. We can all get mad about this and fight together, all other differences aside.