Advertisement
krtek_net

Untitled

Mar 16th, 2014
183
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 7.69 KB | None | 0 0
  1. 19:06 < Jankxed> slicedice: the real solution is to make transactions go off chain
  2. 19:06 < lnovy> Jankxed: lol
  3. 19:06 < lnovy> Jankxed: offchain transactions are not transactions
  4. 19:06 < lnovy> that's what mtgox was doing
  5. 19:07 < Jankxed> you really think you know everything don't you, enve you've been wrong so many times so far, you were backing mark up a few weeksd ago, you were saying gox would be bought 2 weeks ago, then you read more and changed your view.
  6. 19:08 < Jankxed> Lnovy:
  7. 19:08 < lnovy> emma: that's not a transaction... you don't transfer right to move the coin with transaction... you destroy old coins and create new ones with transaction
  8. 19:08 < lnovy> Jankxed: there are facts and there are hypothesis
  9. 19:09 < lnovy> with mtgox there are mostly hypothesis
  10. 19:09 < lnovy> with bitcoin, they are facts
  11. 19:09 < Jankxed> lonvy: you only seem to like the "facts" that back up your opinions
  12. 19:10 < Jankxed> off blockchain transactions have the potential to be done at a fraction of blockchain costs is my understanding , again, i'm always willing to be wrong, but just sayong lol, isn't really proving me wrong.
  13. 19:11 < lnovy> Jankxed: I like the fact, that every fact will be disproved...
  14. 19:11 < lnovy> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_revisionism_(negationism)
  15. 19:12 < Jankxed> slicedice: off blockchain transations don't need a massive network to verify those transactions, hence, the cost is tiny in comparison.
  16. 19:13 < lnovy> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability
  17. 19:13 < lnovy> Popper on you...
  18. 19:14 < Jankxed> off chain just means that transactions are carried out locally , then reconsiled with the blockchain only when needed, i.e. when they leave that local transaction server or group of servers
  19. 19:15 < lnovy> Jankxed: that's centralisation and goes against the principle of bitcoin... you dismiss all pluses of bitcoin and add no others
  20. 19:16 < Jankxed> lonvy: it doesn't have to be centralised
  21. 19:16 < lnovy> mtgoxOPENsoon: we don't know that, but the person who assert this is a proven lier.
  22. 19:16 < Jankxed> who said it had to be centralised??
  23. 19:17 < lnovy> mtgoxOPENsoon: beware, he's a "laywer"
  24. 19:17 < Jankxed> Lonvy: why don't you read up on OT
  25. 19:17 < Jankxed> lovny: before you talk shite
  26. 19:18 < lnovy> Jankxed: off chain transactions are not transaction... they are not secure
  27. 19:18 < Jankxed> lonvy: wrong afgain
  28. 19:19 < Jankxed> lonvy: google Open transactions, do some reading
  29. 19:23 < lnovy> Jankxed: it's broken because it's centralized... you are then trusting a single point of failure instead trusting the chain... all features described can be done in-chain
  30. 19:24 < Jankxed> lonvy: what are yuo tlaking about? it's not centralised, try reading more, i promise you, it is not centralised
  31. 19:26 < Jankxed> lovny: would you like me to dig up some links to prove it?
  32. 19:26 < lnovy> Jankxed: no... you tell me, what OTX has that cannot be done in chain and I will disprove it
  33. 19:27 < Jankxed> lovny: i can't do as good a job as the links
  34. 19:28 < lnovy> Jankxed: I found no feature that OTX offers and cannot be done in chain... so I need to send no link to such feature
  35. 19:29 < Jankxed> lonvy: maybe gmaxwell can help you, i don't know if he has an opinion on it mind.
  36. 19:29 < lnovy> Jankxed: you are proposing that there is something better that needs to be done outside of chain... what it is?
  37. 19:30 < Jankxed> lonvy: faster scalable transactions, less cost of transactions, frees up the blockchain
  38. 19:31 < Jankxed> lovny: micro paymrents
  39. 19:32 < lnovy> Jankxed: micro payments: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Contracts#Example_7:_Rapidly-adjusted_.28micro.29payments_to_a_pre-determined_party
  40. 19:32 < lnovy> Jankxed: transactions are "free" in bitcoin, you cannot go lower than that
  41. 19:32 < Jankxed> slicedice: no , not exactly, not a private blockchain, and it's not my idea, its a fact, it's called OT.
  42. 19:32 < lnovy> Jankxed: freeing up the blockchain doesn't make any sense, since autoregulation of doing so is already in
  43. 19:33 < lnovy> Jankxed: and you can have always transaction that are instant... they are just not secure... these two things are not compatible with network decentralisation
  44. 19:35 < Jankxed> lonvy: just read the info, then comment.
  45. 19:35 < lnovy> Jankxed: what info?
  46. 19:36 < Jankxed> lonvy; oh yeah, i forgot, you said you didn't want me to look for links, well, i guess you made your mind up by yourself then.
  47. 19:36 < lnovy> Jankxed: where the fuck I said that?
  48. 19:37 < lnovy> Jankxed: learn to read man
  49. 19:39 < Jankxed> lonvy: you are such an arsehole
  50. 19:39 < lnovy> Jankxed: quote me, where did I said I don't want you to look for links. Do it.
  51. 19:40 < Jankxed> lonvy: look back at 18;26
  52. 19:40 < lnovy> lnovy> Jankxed: I found no feature that OTX offers and cannot be done in chain... so I need to send no link to such feature // LEARN TO READ, IDIOT
  53. 19:48 < lnovy> Jankxed: you should now apologise
  54. 20:00 -!- Jankxed [[email protected]] has left ##mtgox-talk []
  55. 20:02 -!- Jankxed [[email protected]] has joined ##mtgox-talk
  56. 20:05 < Jankxed> lnovy: did you read my pm? I had trouble with my irc. It's you who needs to apologise dude.
  57. 20:07 < lnovy> i hate this game
  58. 20:07 < lnovy> Jankxed: what pm? I recieved any from you
  59. 20:07 < lnovy> Jankxed: stop trolling
  60. 20:07 < lnovy> faouanima: \o/
  61. 20:08 < faouanima> lnovy, heavy?
  62. 20:09 < lnovy> faouanima: ~350 ghs of sha256²
  63. 20:09 < Jankxed> 1. 14:25:48 < Jankxed> lovny: would you like me to dig up some links to prove it?
  64. 20:09 < Jankxed> 3. 14:26:01 < sliceDice> until its done in the coryts and proof exists
  65. 20:09 < Jankxed> 4. 14:26:15 < lnovy> Jankxed: no... you tell me, what OTX has that cannot be done in chain and I will disprove it
  66. 20:09 < Jankxed> lovny: you are a dick.
  67. 20:09 < faouanima> lnovy, SHA i am at 3TH and waiting for 18TH from KNC
  68. 20:09 < lnovy> enough
  69. 20:10 -!- mode/##mtgox-talk [+o lnovy] by ChanServ
  70. 20:10 -!- mode/##mtgox-talk [+b *!*[email protected].*] by lnovy
  71. 20:10 -!- Jankxed was kicked from ##mtgox-talk by lnovy [5 minutes]
  72. 20:10 <@lnovy> faouanima: I also have knc
  73. 20:10 <@lnovy> faouanima: I came to know how to overclock it myself =)
  74. 20:12 <@lnovy> faouanima: lulz :D
  75. 20:15 -!- mode/##mtgox-talk [-b *!*[email protected].*] by lnovy
  76. 20:15 -!- mode/##mtgox-talk [-o lnovy] by lnovy
  77. 20:17 < lnovy> fsck! i just poured almost an 8ball of K to my keyboard :/
  78. 20:17 < faouanima> emma, <Jankxed> lovny: you are a dick. when i saw that i understood he gonna get kicked
  79. 20:17 < B0g4r7> lnovy, part of a complete breakfast!
  80. 20:17 < lnovy> emma: he was clearly trolling...
  81. 20:18 < lnovy> he on purporse misread my lines, then blame it on problem in irc and used ad hominem nonargument... trolling
  82. 20:18 -!- Jankxed [[email protected]] has joined ##mtgox-talk
  83. 20:19 < faouanima> emma, lnovy have no feelings he just enjoy the kick
  84. 20:19 < lnovy> faouanima: yeah, I felt great! :)
  85. 20:20 < Jankxed> lovny; so you got on your little power trip and kicked me because i proved you wrong, nice.
  86. 20:20 < lnovy> and... I like how you presume that without feelings I enjoy something... you know... without feelings... I start to feel lonely pretty fast...
  87. 20:21 < lnovy> Jankxed: use /nick Troll
  88. 20:21 < emma> lnovy, Jankxed lets try to be kind to one another. Both of you are intelligent men with strong opinions. Try to be friends.
  89. 20:21 < [\\\]> sorry lnovy, I already grouped it.
  90. 20:21 < Jankxed> lovny: it's there on the logs , are you blind?
  91. 20:21 < lnovy> [\\\]: :(((
  92. 20:22 < [\\\]> hey Jankxed, still trolling?
  93. 20:22 < lnovy> emma: just read our convo, you will get it :)
  94. 20:23 < lnovy> emma: he's either a troll or an idiot.... I prefer the former one...
  95. 20:24 < lnovy> phat blunt +1 <3
  96. 20:24 < Jankxed> lovny: i asked you if you wanted me to send you a link , you replied "no" it's you who are an idiot
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement