Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-15 1215 PUBLIC

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-15 1215 PUBLIC
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/dxmyhddLGwr
https://pastebin.com/yXH6A6Pc
__


The filename is "20151201-WA0000". Given that most people who claim to photograph the "ISS" take a "burst of photos" you would expect it to have a filename like "WA0027" etc. *What we see suggests it was the first photo taken.*

And what we see - _of course_ - is the alleged "ISS" (or a model of it) tilted on an angle. That is the point of this time-wasting exercise. *To show an image that "looks a bit strange" and conclude it was "on its side".*

People like "MomoTheBellyDancer" can cry out: *"Silly conspiracy theorists! It's the 'ISS' but on an angle! GAWWWW"*

After all - "conspiracy theorists" just latch onto something that is a bit unusual and cry out "fake!"

*I notice that "Jeff C" has been saying that lately* - has he already forgotten about the "good work" he did on the "LAX Dummy"? Where he pointed to it and said "that doesn't look right"?!

__

All of this appears to be an effort to misdirect from the fact that *there is no sustained duration zero-gravity footage that upon scrutiny remains free from glaring glitches, clever cuts, sneaky edits and misdirecting pans.*

(Footage which +nationalparksign . has been going through and posting detailed notes for - excellent work. That is what needs to be done - to show all the numerous "edits" and "potential edit points")

>>> The ONLY thing that *necessarily proves* there is a real and manned permanent zero-gravity environment has NOT been shown despite having had 15+ years to show it. <<<

Therefore we are entitled to say that such qualifying footage is being INTENTIONALLY WITHHELD.

*And it is THAT which proves the lie system.* That sufficient proof is routinely withheld. What we see with the image allegedly taken is - as you say - no different to a moth (it probably is haha). _You have to TRUST that it isn't a moth!_

*That is where my focus needs to be.* These people like "Reds Rhetoric" can too easily show a photo of a MOTH and exclaim "ISS"!

By the way - +Terran Downvale - with my upcoming video I am going to be showing something that illustrates this problem and your moth comment has given me a nice idea haha (though it may not be successful).

Simply - too many people are stuck on the idea "but you can see it". So that point must be conceded for the sake of argument so as to get to the meat and potatoes of the issue which is that *sufficient proof* is routinely withheld etc.

__

+Terran Downvale, +Anthony B.


__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w