Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- Lesta Nediam LNC2016-08-14 0040 +Controlled Opposition
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECQwFmOV1Y8&google_comment_id=z13fydrjepqtdlshx04cgfpzjm3pgr4zxgs
- https://pastebin.com/yVWTMqzM
- __
- +Controlled Opposition __ You almost had a point but then as usual went and ruined it. There are two aspects which your *dummy brain* are struggling with:
- 1. The things I am talking about may "resemble" philosophy to you - _but not quite._ Objectively you can either *know* something or you *cannot*. That's not controversial. You *don't know* that the "Orlando Shooting" really happened - *_you simply TRUST that it did_*.
- (By the way, a liar does not help himself when he responds to someone who doubts his story: _"You don't know that I'm *NOT* lying - you're just waxing philosophical"._)
- __
- 2. Are you *really* trying to approach this event as a "legal issue" with people you must understand don't recognise it as such? *How are you not retarded if you think approaching this as a "legal issue" with "hoaxtards" can be effective?*
- Sometimes courts get things wrong. _Or would you disagree?!_
- Not everyone in prison is guilty of what they have been accused of. _Or would you disagree?!_
- Woah!
- Here's the thing. You're not seeing the giant forest for the 60-mile high giant trees.
- There are a thousand events that are reported in the news media which "hoaxtards" *do not doubt or question*. We are not talking about a thousand news events - *_only one_*.
- We aren't talking "broadly" about "events" but rather about a *specific"* event. And so whether you like it or not - it *does* become important as to whether you *can* actually *know* something about a *specific* claim or not.
- On this occasion you *cannot* - _though your belief may be a true one._
- It is not being "philosophical" to point out that your belief - _however true it may be_ - is not a justified belief.
- It does not matter that a court would agree with you because as far as the "hoaxtards" are concerned the event would be coming from the same forces that control the courts.
- __
- All you are really saying is: "I am satisfied that this event is real because I trust the people who are telling me it happened and I see no reason to stop believing when courts would also trust the people telling the story".
- You likely won't be able to understand this because of your *dummy brain* but what you're effectively doing is *_asking a liar if he is lying to you_*.
- That the courts would go along with a liar can tell us nothing about the reality of an event happening or not.
- __
- I am worried about you. You obviously felt no shame dressing up like Putin in drag. _I think you might be a little unhinged._
- Are you trying to become so frustrated that you end up carrying out a mass-shooting *just to prove once and for all to "hoaxtards" that at least one of them was real?*
- Woah! You're NUTS!
- _I sure hope I haven't planted *that* idea in your head!_
- ______________________________________________________________
- My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
- Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
- Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
- https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
- Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
- https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
- Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
- https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
- What does not exist - exists to exist.
- What exists - exists to always exist.
- As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment