11 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-07-08 0410 +Brian Hill

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-07-08 0410 +Brian Hill
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOnpUIWf12g&lc=z13wtnybyvbewl1bq04cdz5wjknqu1iwjck
https://pastebin.com/yTW6mau7
__

+Brian Hill __ A "fatal" mistake is something that "normal people" upon seeing it will accept as proof of something fabricated and cannot invent a "plausible explanation" to dismiss it.







Seeing a boom mic in a movie means you are watching a movie. Seeing someone allegedly get "gunned down" on the nightly news but then seeing the "corpse" get up and start giggling would be a "fatal mistake".







It's something a "normal person" cannot deny and cannot invent an "excuse" for.







To those of us who accept the possibility of fabricated events we see what appear to be fatal mistakes all the time but they are not to "normal people".







For example - with the alleged "Boston Marathon Bombing" I looked for photos of the alleged "survivors" having legs before the alleged "bomb blast". There was one photo of "Adrianne Haslet-Davis" appearing to dance and her "missing" leg - to me - had clearly been photoshopped in. While it was proof of shenanigans to me each "normal person" I showed the photo to could not see what I saw. "It's just the lighting" I was told. "Her leg is in motion hence looks a bit strange" I was told.







I was given every possible "plausible explanation" - no matter how unlikely - and it was done so as to reject the simpler and more obvious explanation that her missing leg had been photoshopped in.







What seemed obvious to me wasn't obvious to those who believed the event was real (their belief it was real is what caused them to imagine a plausible explanation and once they'd thought of something it allowed them to stop thinking about what I had shown them).







(Of course - had the alleged "Boston Marathon Bombing" been genuine or had it been fabricated but "Adrianne Haslet-Davis" really did have her leg at that time - the photo could have been made to appear photoshopped so that those scrutinising the event would be sent down a dead-end and their claim "debunked" if needed.)







That is why I say that for most who "wake up" their route to waking up to fabricated events typically arises from making a mistake of some kind (seeing something as "proof of fraud" when it's not necessarily proof) and/or by experiencing "natural paranoia" and distrust (many if not most in the "truth community" are naturally paranoid people who don't know how to hang on to sanity - causing them to latch onto "proof of fraud" that isn't really proof of fraud; hence my guiding principle of seeking "true things for true reasons" as being the only reliable way to arrive at the truth while hanging onto sanity in an apparently insane world).







This works to the advantage of the lie system because honest people can mistakenly label something a "fatal mistake" (or the dishonest controlled opposition can do so if honest people don't) and then "event realists" are then free to step in and "debunk" the "non proof" (as we see people like "BzTruetalk" and [now] the user "Controlled Opposition" doing).







So - having written all of this. Can you pick just one of your examples. Pick one that you can still show (if a news article no longer exists then it cannot count - it may have been a fake/prank article; several fake articles have been put into circulation so as to trap and discredit "truthers"). Pick a single example. Explain what's "fatal" about it (again) and then I'll point out how a "normal person" would go about dismissing it. (If the lie system actually wants the people to revolt then it will show a single fatal mistake but not a moment sooner and it will be a huge and undeniable "mistake" that cannot be dismissed - but that's a different topic.)







Of course - fatal mistakes for non lie system events/claims can exist. If you or I were to stage our own "event" no doubt we'd make fatal mistakes. We are individuals/amateurs and not of the lie system. I'm talking only about lie system events/claims (such as the alleged "ISS", "mass shootings", anything like that which is being seriously put forward as genuine by the news media that follows the "rules/methodology" of the lie system [e.g., withholding sufficient proof for a claim etc.]).







I know you gave a few examples - just pick and repeat one of them and give some links so I can take a closer look for myself. If you give a YouTube link remember only to give the "watch" part of the URL else your message will end up in spam.







The key point is this: If a "normal person" can invent a "plausible explanation" for what you're pointing out then while it may be considered a fatal mistake to you - it's not a genuine "fatal" mistake.







It has to be something obvious and undeniable to "normal people" and not just "truthers" and those who are paranoid and have stopped trusting the news media.







With these points in mind you'll probably realise that a "fatal mistake" is much more difficult to actually find/isolate (and I suggest does not exist for lie system events/claims).







If "fatal mistakes" really did exist then most - if not all - would be a "truther" and there would be rioting in the streets. It's the ability to invent "plausible explanations" (for what is to us obvious bullsh!t) that stops this from happening. (While giving us a fatal mistake is an option for the lie system I strongly suggest it does not need or want to "get caught" and wishes only to keep doing what it's doing.)

__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w