Lesta

5 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-29 1005 +Anthony B.

Mar 28th, 2016
94
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 4.61 KB | None | 0 0
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-29 1005 +Anthony B.
  2. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/AgFNMyjkTyR
  3. https://pastebin.com/yF5uWAT3
  4. __
  5.  
  6.  
  7. +Anthony B. __ Yes - I thought you might bring up the "scrolling glitch". It only weakens your position. The central claim against "Peekay" had to do with his focus on the number "333" - *which is something he has just recently done again.*
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11. Curiously enough - ever since I posted my video pointing out the scrolling glitch and the multiple flash players - *those issues for "Peekay" have magically resolved.*
  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
  15. >>> *The fact you would deflect and seek to turn this on me is disappointing. Are we not on the same team?* <<<
  16.  
  17.  
  18.  
  19. I made a mistake with the scrolling glitch *because I wanted to read too much into it.*
  20.  
  21.  
  22.  
  23. I had come up with a theory to explain all of the evidence I had found. The theory was sound enough *but not all of the evidence.*
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27. And that seems to be the mistake you're making. *Two people can sound alike but not be the same person.*
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31. So you need to do a little more than you have. You keep talking about having "evidence" but you never show it and you have not described what it is.
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35. When I examined the "Peekay" issue +Terran Downvale managed to reproduce the scrolling glitch. The *instant* that he did I abandoned the theory I had formed because I realised it was much simpler.
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39.  
  40. That "Peekay" only wanted to focus on the number "333" - that's all. It was nothing more than that. (And as I say - he has again focused on that number just recently.)
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44.  
  45. The scrolling glitch was a mistake that I won't make again and it is a mistake I see that you are now making. If you are wise you will learn from it. *If you are not wise - you'll repeat it.*
  46.  
  47.  
  48.  
  49.  
  50. It's not too late to prevent what is happening. I would have preferred Terran reproduced the problem before I made a video focusing on the scrolling glitch. I focused on the scrolling glitch because "Peekay" pretended he didn't know what I was talking about.
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54.  
  55. I walked into that one. That is another mistake I won't be making again.
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59.  
  60. *So why are you really insisting that "Jeff C" and "Stefan Molyneux" are the same person?*
  61.  
  62.  
  63.  
  64. They are not the same person and you know it too. *If you really thought they were the same person you'd be a little more interested in the "Brussels Girl" and you'd have presented some of your evidence by now.*
  65.  
  66.  
  67.  
  68. What *is* your evidence?
  69.  
  70.  
  71.  
  72. If you can't or won't show it - then can you at least describe it?
  73.  
  74.  
  75.  
  76. You're being mysterious and elusive and my patience has worn thin. Right now you are wasting time. Whether you think that's what you're doing - that is what you are doing.
  77.  
  78.  
  79.  
  80. *You are effectively sacrificing your reputation for what reason?*
  81.  
  82.  
  83.  
  84. It doesn't make any sense.
  85.  
  86.  
  87.  
  88. How can I take anything you say seriously again when you making a huge claim which is supported by nothing except "trust me - I'm an audio engineer who has made this mistake once before".
  89.  
  90.  
  91.  
  92. You are throwing caution to the wind.
  93.  
  94.  
  95.  
  96. What is this about? Is it really a coincidence that John le Bon (JLB) would include my name as one of the instigators of the claim? Is it also a coincidence that JLB would rip off what I did with "Jeff C" and the "Boston Marathon Bombing"?
  97.  
  98.  
  99.  
  100. *What's going on?*
  101.  
  102.  
  103.  
  104. Now is your chance to describe the evidence you have and to explain what's going on.
  105.  
  106.  
  107.  
  108. But if you don't then know this: *I have no more patience for timewasters.*
  109.  
  110.  
  111.  
  112. "Jeff C" is not "Stefan Molyneux" and you know it. So unless you can prove it with some "evidence" then I have to conclude you're playing games.
  113.  
  114.  
  115.  
  116. It was very poor form to bring up the scrolling glitch. *That tells me you have no confidence in what you're saying.*
  117.  
  118.  
  119.  
  120. It's not too late to stop and abort. At this point I won't hold anything against you if you come to your senses. But if you insist on playing games then what choice do you leave me?
  121.  
  122.  
  123.  
  124. You have already asserted "Jeff C" is "Stefan Molyneux" and so there is no reason to hold back on the evidence you say you have.
  125.  
  126.  
  127.  
  128. *So what is the evidence?*
  129.  
  130.  
  131.  
  132.  
  133. __________________________________________
  134. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
  135. https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg
  136.  
  137. Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
  138. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  139.  
  140. Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
  141. https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1
  142.  
  143. Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
  144. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment