Why Bipa lied about things that were good for him

    https://imgur.com/a/Cr7zhrU

	The conclusion Bipa reached in his document regarding the screenshots from the Akira group chat and the ones from DM's between him and Hisokka are both false. First, the denial of his recognition of him having a problem will be addressed. As you can clearly see in the second attached screenshot, even one of his close friends agrees with the fact that he has had really bad habits in the past regarding dating and needs to work on himself and recover. Bipa himself even agreed and for some reason now is trying to act as if he had never agreed to it. Why anyone would deny such an honorable response to dishonorable allegations is far beyond me, because if he had just said that he agreed with that and was doing as he said there, that would have fared far better for him.
	The Akira group chat conclusion he reached is also falsified. The chat did not die after he proved everyone else wrong, and there was no happy ending. The chat died because it was pointed out that there was a very obvious four year age gap between the two of them and two years ago that would have put Akira at 15 if she was 17 at the time of that group chat and Pipa at 19, likely 20 depending on what time of year it was because of his December birthday. Obviously, a 19-20 year old and 15 year old have very different expectations in a relationship. Based on Bipa's extremely...well known history of dating we can further confirm this because the things Bipa expected in a relationship are very different than what any normal person would expect in a relationship at 15 years old. Thus indicating that he had taken advantage of her and had Bipa himself not "debunked" the chat wherein he agreed with Hiso's conclusion that he needed to take some time for himself this would have been considered fine. However interestingly enough, he attempts to now disregard the outcome of the entire event even though the confirmed consensus from other members of that group chat including his own close friend Zela are the exact opposite and still evident from the part where he shows their ID's. The first and third of the screenshots in the album shows the input of his close friend who was present in the group chat at the time of the investigation.
	Extrapolation in such sensitive situations is usually over the top, but I think you'll find that these conclusions are exactly in line with what Bipa has shown us. So both of the events described above in paragraphs one and two are things that happened some time ago. Things that happened in BM1. These are separate events from the other accusations that do not have to do with Bipa's dating history. These also had separate conclusions and were not at all related to the other accusations regarding Bipa's general BM1 history. So why would Bipa go out of his way to outright deny them? He had even at one point admitted that he needed to work on himself and his "desperation rather than preference" when it came to dating had gotten him into troubling waters. Admitting ones prior mistakes but pointing out that there is nothing like that happening now is a stronger argument than attempting to lie about something with so much evidence against the new conclusion reached by him. So why would he do it? Now again, people change. Change is welcomed by all, especially by the one who is doing it if it is objectively beneficial. So why now is Bipa denying that he needed to change his ways and that he had ever done anything wrong regarding his dating habits? Well, that points to the conclusion that he does not care. In his mind, he believes that his past actions were fine. In his mind, a 15 year old and a 19-20 year old dating is acceptable. This blatant grooming of children in his mind, is fine. He sees no issue with it. One wouldn't be reading this right now if Bipa had accepted the conclusion that he needed to work on himself and further understand why grooming children is unacceptable. Yet he "debunked" that. So in summary, Bipa disagrees with the fact that the grooming of children to the point of displaying Stockholmes syndrome-esque behavior is unacceptable. He disagrees with the fact that after being confirmed to have been engaging in behavior like that that he needs to change his ways. After being presented with this real evidence, rather than selectively taken screenshots of a group chat wherein the conclusion is still easily visible, the author now leaves the reader here to form their own conclusion. "Have a nice day y'all!".