TAKE THE GUNS FIRST

TAKE THE GUNS FIRST

Regardless of where it was that we came to our current worldview from, one of our first big redpills was that a disarmed populace is much more open to tyranny than an armed one. At first glance, this checks out with reality - Americans enjoy more freedom than the Brits, who can't even carry a knife on their person, even if that freedom is limited to dumb shit that does nothing to actually make your life better. Real freedom, meaning that you can choose whom to live with, who makes decisions on behalf of your community and who can eat from your table, is absolutely forbidden to Whites around the world, especially those in America, whose communities are being flooded with non-White immigrants. You may say that the wages of sin is death and that this decline is divine punishment for America's defiance against God, and you would be right, but we did not come here to engage in flagellation. Our message is one of ACTION.
If we listen to prominent firearms activists, the biggest threat to armed America is federal-level confiscation. The scenario of the feds going door to door, seizing guns and ammunition, would be terrifying, if one did not realise the sheer scale of such an operation and how woefully unprepared the government is for it. The U.S. is home to as many firearms as people, with 100 million gun owners spread out across the country. To say that the federal government lacks the manpower to carry out such an action is an understatement.
This is why the State has played the long game for close to 100 years. First they came for the automatics, then they moved on to heavily restricting firearms ownership in the major metropolitan areas (where crime levels are much higher than in the well-armed countryside, due in no small part to the local demographics), then they moved to banning "assault weapons" and "high capacity magazines" (whatever those are) and now they're trying this "red flag" foolishness.
The reasoning behind this strategy is simple. The smaller the scale and impact of each consecutive step on the way to disarmament, the less likely it is to inspire a popular uprising. However, with red flag laws, a new challenge has appeared that the feds are likely underestimating - in today's severely polarised society with little to no social trust, cucks will attempt to get their opponents disarmed at a much higher rate than was accounted for. Red flag laws were, after all, meant mostly to curb gun ownership among the "mentally ill", an ever expanding chunk of the populace thanks to the hard work of Big Pharma and its allied (((psychiatrists))). You can tell it's bullshit when they don't include trannies in the definition!
So when (it's really a matter of time, and we should be fucking thankful for that) red flag laws are passed, the federal government is going to have their hands full. They will greatly inconvenience a lot of people at once, which is exactly something you want to prevent if you want to exercise power over a populace. Inconvenience leads to lack of respect for the government, something the ZOG in America has to avoid, since the fact that most gun owners see law enforcement as not just legitimate, but praiseworthy. Once those pigs are kicking down their neighbour's door, their perspective might change.
Another angle to explore is acceleration. Obviously, any kind of big gun control law would be a step towards driving people away from an increasingly hostile State apparatus, which is an advantage for us in the long term. Some have even called Donald Trump "the accelerationist candidate", but I am inclined to disagree. While it's true that his treason has been an eye-opener for White America about the lack of political solutions, there is still a large number of lemmings who will blindly follow him off a cliff if need be. This is why ZOG makes sure that it's the Republicans that pass amnesty for invaders and that Democrats do nothing against the selling out of America to the highest bidder without giving the people a choice. If Trump is the one to pass red flag laws, too many people will obey him for it to serve accelerationist purposes. If, however, a brown Democrat like Kamala Harris takes the presidency, not only is she likely to pursue more aggressive gun control measures, she's also going to anger more White people and perhaps make some of them notice the racial angle of disarmament, thus again playing into our hands.
The main takeaway is - don't give your guns away, lads. Make sure to be prepared to lay low so that when shit kicks off, you can join the ranks of the troublemakers, whether they're goons or boogaloo boys.