Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- ;; Discussing a CFFI wrapper for the WinAPI
- 13:02 < pjb> Guthur`: the problem here is not the stability of the API, it's its size.
- 13:03 < pjb> And ensuring that all the wrapper are bug free, in all circumstances.
- 13:03 < Guthur`> pjb: sure, just a passing comment to help encourage would be implementers, hehe
- 13:03 < pjb> Assuring that a unix wrapper is ok, with signal handling, errno, etc, is already hard enough, I wouldn't want to think about the WinAPI.
- 13:04 < stassats`> yes, if you can't have a bug-free code, don't write any
- 13:04 < hitecnologys> stassats`: how's your IDE thing going on, by the way?
- 13:04 < Guthur`> he found a bug so deleted it
- 13:04 < stassats`> hitecnologys: i followed pjb's advice and stopped writing it, it's inevitable to have bugs
- 13:05 < hitecnologys> stassats`: so, no replacement for SLIME is coming?
- 13:05 < stassats`> hitecnologys: i know only bitch on irc about other people successfully writing new software
- 13:05 < stassats`> now
- 13:05 < Guthur`> SLIME replacement, that's a tall order
- 13:06 < hitecnologys> I see.
- 13:06 < Guthur`> stassats`: do you not already do some work on SLIME
- 13:06 < stassats`> i did
- 13:07 < stassats`> but fixing bugs is for suckers
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
