Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-05 1715 +TruthAlwaysWins

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-05 1715 +TruthAlwaysWins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIag49h38Dc&lc=z13pwhiyilyiytoyo04cdt3gfme3j1kjpbg
https://pastebin.com/wDbxQn1b
__


+TruthAlwaysWins __ What better point would you have made with this clip? I am asking seriously. In this clip we see two apparent *strangers* on opposite sides of the street and then it turns out they either *knew each other* or the guy had some kind of magical attraction over the woman! It is one or the other (*or* it's a contrived scene).







The point I am making (with - _I hope_ - some measure of humour) is that *if* the alleged "Nepal earthquake" did not actually happen then necessarily *every scene will not stand up to scrutiny.* (I.e., we'll see no *real* damage or genuine proof of an earthquake. We'll see shenanigans everywhere we turn our attention or if it's real footage then it'll come from an earlier unrelated event.)







I ask: *what are the odds of what we saw happening?!* If someone believes that this was a real scene of a real earthquake then they must believe those two *knew each other* (or he is a master pick-up artist!).







How could this point have been made any better (with humour - too)? Just what better point could have been made?!







All of the footage we saw from the alleged "Nepal earthquake" event was *suspect.* Here is the key point: If the earthquake DID really happen then we have NOT been shown (sufficient) proof of it and we are once again *forced to trust* what we are told and *forced to accept* (or *mistake*) proof's appearances instead of proof. (This is a key point which seems lost on many people. The absence of proof is not proof something didn't happen but if it *did* happen and we are shown no genuine proof for it then it has been *withheld* from us.)







*The alleged "Nepal earthquake" had all the traits of a lie system event/claim.* And in a lie system it is our duty as genuine dissidents to rationally doubt all claims and events that lack sufficient proof.







If anyone believes the "Nepal earthquake" really happened then it is only because they trust what the television has told them and they have likely mistaken proof's appearances for proof. (Of course - everything looks real to the mentally ill for they are like the "colour blinds" [my term] who are *powerless to discern between real and pretend.*)







Or - _more simply_ - a believer of the "Nepal earthquake" event cannot fathom that an earthquake could possibly be "faked/staged" or lied about [misrepresented]. (But again - it can be a genuine earthquake but what we have been shown does not allow us to justify having that belief though now I'm surely going in circles!)







So - _to return to where I began_ - what better point would you have made with this clip?!



__________________________________________
Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's posts, comments, videos and discussions:
https://pastebin.com/Bfr5RMSg

Here is Lesta Nediam's Google Plus posts (i.e., blog) - this is where Lesta is most active:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Here is an annotated text file with links to all of Lesta Nediam's video uploads:
https://pastebin.com/WV42jUb1

Here is Lesta Nediam's YouTube channel - for videos about the lie system:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w