Advertisement
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- DeepThought 20:23:11
- i didnt ask you LaZeR, i asked Sara_Ks
- +maxxiii 20:23:30
- it's a lot, that's why it's so important to spread the message DeepThought
- DeepThought 20:23:31
- i know your pov
- +maxxiii 20:23:36
- people need to have a choice
- LaZeR 20:23:56
- Sara_Ks is it raining in Florida right this minute?
- DeepThought 20:24:06
- maxxiii yes but even today people never hear the word of god, and they just go directly to hell? is that a just god?
- +maxxiii 20:24:10
- in my case, I was raised in a false religion too. It's not like you can grow up and not hear about Jesus nowadays, it's practically unheard of.
- DeepThought 20:24:23
- maxxiii thats false
- RachelThompson 20:24:30
- There are no gods.
- Why do you still debate this topic?
- Science hasn't taken theism seriously since about 1830.
- It's currently 2019.
- LaZeR 20:25:15
- Sara_Ks - you deflected like xians often do - try again: is it raining in Florida right this minute?
- RachelThompson coz christians are suffereing
- suffering
- RachelThompson 20:26:21
- Relevance?
- LaZeR 20:26:46
- reason for topic
- RachelThompson 20:26:51
- LaZeR: Sara_Ks has a long history of being a dishonest human being.
- In my view, she is excluded from the Community of Consideration.
- But, feel free to bash your head against that wall for awhile.
- LaZeR: Theism is resolved in regards to an explanatory framework.
- LaZeR 20:27:45
- Sara_Ks - you deflected like xians often do - try again: is my TV on right this minute?
- RachelThompson 20:27:55
- Theism remains interesting as a topic in psychology, anthropology, and evolution.
- LaZeR 20:29:22
- ok well that's my answer for the question you asked me
- that's irrelevant - if i look at my tv i KNOW if it's on or off
- no one can "look" at god and state if he exists or not
- Sara_Ks i answered the SAME question a long time ago
- you just continue re-phrasing the SAME question differently
- DeepThought 20:31:52
- Sara_Ks if someone is born lives and dies and never hears the "word of god" can they go to heaven when they die?
- LaZeR 20:32:45
- this is a TRICK christians often leverage <LaZeR> you just continue re-phrasing the SAME question differently
- DeepThought 20:32:50
- there is no such thing in humans
- RachelThompson 20:32:56
- It took me years to get over the psychological pressure I felt from realizing that theists are generally highly confused about their theistic beliefs.
- And so I used to debate them a lot.
- → UnderCoverNerd has joined
- DeepThought 20:33:22
- Sara_Ks is this documented in the bible?
- RachelThompson 20:33:25
- That's sort of how I understand why the two of you are drawn to to engaging Sara_Ks on this topic.
- ⓘ IL_Shaman gives voice to UnderCoverNerd
- RachelThompson 20:33:33
- Even though by multiple metrics she is highly objectionable.
- LaZeR 20:33:33
- Sara_Ks this is a DEPARTURE from christianity <Sara_Ks> DeepThought I would think God knows their heart and what they would do. Example, Moses, Abraham. Elijah, and other prophets did not hear of Jesus, likely they are in heaven
- RachelThompson 20:34:12
- Part of you isn't ready to accept that theists are a different sub-species of humans who live in an entirely different cognitive reality.
- That's hard for you to parse, I think, given that you're pretty confident we live in an atheistic reality.
- Theism is an evolved behavioral, social, and cognitive adaptation to promote group cohesion.
- That's it.
- There's nothing fancier going on there.
- Things like Christianity are cultural systems that build off evolutionary impulses in our species to somewhat formalize our instincts on relationships, justice, etc.
- That's it.
- That's what the Bible is doing.
- DeepThought 20:35:47
- i tend to believe theism is just that but i still have no evidence that gods dont exist, yet
- RachelThompson 20:35:57
- You don't have evidence that gods don't exist.
- That is a very strange thing to say.
- → WorldWidePants has joined
- RachelThompson 20:36:13
- It's consistent with scientific realism.
- ⓘ IL_Shaman gives voice to WorldWidePants
- RachelThompson 20:36:17
- Are you not a scientific realist?
- ⓘ WorldWidePants is now known as VaN-HaGaR
- +VaN-HaGaR 20:36:25
- Sara_Ks this is a DEPARTURE from christianity <Sara_Ks> DeepThought I would think God knows their heart and what they would do. Example, Moses, Abraham. Elijah, and other prophets did not hear of Jesus, likely they are in heaven
- RachelThompson 20:36:33
- DeepThought: The epistemic basis of science is Bayesian inference.
- That is, there are distinct models of reality, whose ultimate reality is hidden, and we collect evidence to modify the posterior probabilities on those competing models.
- DeepThought 20:37:20
- RachelThompson i rarely engage in absolutes as as a species we know very little of the natural and scientific worlds
- RachelThompson 20:37:20
- Any evidence which lowers the probability on theistic models is "evidence against theism".
- DeepThought: Which absolutes are you referencing?
- DeepThought 20:37:36
- maxxiii prove it
- RachelThompson 20:37:50
- DeepThought: maxxiii is excluded from the community of consideration.
- That should be pretty apparent at this point.
- DeepThought 20:38:13
- absolutes like "there is no god" you are probably right, but you know so little of this universe
- RachelThompson 20:38:34
- Absolutes are disallowed in Bayesian models.
- The probability of theistic models is greater than 0.
- It's just so low that *no domain of science using theism as an explanatory framework*.
- DeepThought 20:39:03
- so i say, " i have seen no evidence that proves to me there is a god, yet"
- RachelThompson 20:39:07
- Yes, you have.
- I just explained that.
- Any evidence which lowers the probability on theistic models is "evidence against theism".
- So, evidence of the evolution of theism in human minds is evidence against theism.
- As it partially explains why there are theistic humans independent of any congruence between their hypothesis and the non-human universe.
- That is, they're just explaining their own minds with their theistic models.
- That is powerful evidence against theism.
- DeepThought: You don't need to take theism particularly seriously, that is, the prior is low.
- That is because it's now reasonably understood that theism is just a cognitive pattern and never should have been given much credence as a 'model' of reality.
- The only reason that isn't immediately obvious is because you got born into the 20th/21st century where your culture retains a lot of significance to the theistic pattern.
- As an explanatory framework, it can almost immediately be discarded in its historical forms.
- DeepThought 20:42:16
- RachelThompson I dont take theism particularly seriously, but i dont claim i know there is no god
- ← QuBit has left (I)
- RachelThompson 20:42:32
- DeepThought: You appear to be referencing non-scientific epistemology.
- Your usage of "know" there seems to point to something like certainty one.
- That is disallowed in science, and therefore I don't have that view.
- DeepThought 20:42:57
- science makes claims and theorys it has evidence for
- RachelThompson 20:42:58
- Therefore, you're defeating a strawman.
- DeepThought 20:43:22
- science is often wrong
- science has no ego
- RachelThompson 20:43:30
- I know the posteriors on historical forms of theism is exceedingly low, so low that I discard it and essentially never consider it as a possible model of reality.
- DeepThought 20:43:32
- science corrects its self
- RachelThompson 20:43:35
- That's what "knowing" means in science.
- So, in that sense, I know there are no gods, which high probability.
- But, the high probability is not strictly necessary, as I'm already stated I use scientific epistemology.
- Therefore, I know there are no gods.
- DeepThought 20:44:33
- you assume there are no gods and with zero evidence for gods, thats a safe bet
- RachelThompson 20:44:41
- That is unbelievable.
- DeepThought 20:44:42
- but you cannot know
- RachelThompson 20:45:18
- You're unwilling to learn on this topic at this time, I feel.
- You're not really engaging me.
- +VaN-HaGaR 20:45:30
- there is no measureable, physical, tangible, proof of god
- RachelThompson 20:45:37
- I just reminded you that all forms of science, since like 1830, haven't considered theism seriously.
- And there are currently NO models of reality that are theistic at the cutting edge models of reality.
- And you translated that to "you assume".
- You both personalized it, and rejected the fact that all forms of science have investigated this topic seriously for 150 years and provided no support for theism.
- That is willful anti-intellectualism.
- +VaN-HaGaR 20:46:32
- RachelThompson that is coz most religions BANNED scienc
- e
- * 20:46:35
- Ignoring DeepThought
- RachelThompson 20:46:48
- DeepThought: I disengaged from you as a result of that completely indefensible post.
- I wish you luck with maxxiii and Sara_Ks
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement