API tools faq
paste
Lesta

4 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-11-16 1040 +Flat Earth Math

Lesta
Nov 15th, 2016
132
0
Never
Add comment
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 3.23 KB | None | 0 0
raw download clone embed print report
  1. Lesta Nediam LNC2016-11-16 1040 +Flat Earth Math
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqovzNGqtqo&google_comment_id=z12igtt4ckyeu3vqv04cch0yppqywtvasnc0k
  3. https://pastebin.com/vJQ5fh8M
  4. __
  5.  
  6. +Flat Earth Math __ ::sigh:: You really are too stupid for me to keep replying to so I will correct you on the "AND" aspect and then this must be my final message to you.
  7.  
  8.  
  9.  
  10.  
  11. I do understand why you would think "OR" is appropriate - *but it isn't*.
  12.  
  13.  
  14.  
  15.  
  16. I do not expect you to understand what I am writing here and so this is for the benefit of those who are reading silently.
  17.  
  18.  
  19.  
  20.  
  21. Simply reverse the order of the conditions I gave for *clarity* in order to see that BOTH conditions are needed when *rejecting the video by "Jeranism"*.
  22.  
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26. (Why reverse them? Whether "OR" or "AND" the order of the conditions does not matter. However - the order of the conditions can be misleading to some people such as yourself. Reversing the order can help you to see that "OR" doesn't work out for what we're trying to do.)
  27.  
  28.  
  29.  
  30.  
  31. For example - the way YOU would have it is as follows (we'll simply reverse the order of the conditions):
  32.  
  33.  
  34.  
  35.  
  36. 1) "Jeranism" is posting an authentic "NASA" video.
  37.  
  38. OR
  39.  
  40. 2) There are no scuba-divers during EVAs.
  41.  
  42.  
  43.  
  44.  
  45. __
  46.  
  47.  
  48.  
  49.  
  50. You are saying "either one of the two conditions is enough to reject the video by 'Jeranism'". This is incorrect.
  51.  
  52.  
  53.  
  54. *With the first condition you are having to assume the conclusion*. It does not follow that an official "NASA" video would be free of scuba-divers because it could be that "NASA" are faking the "EVAs" with scuba divers. *Jeranism is TESTING that very proposition*!
  55.  
  56.  
  57.  
  58.  
  59. Which means you did not understand what I meant above when I wrote: *"you are assuming the conclusion"*. (E.g., "God exists because God exists")
  60.  
  61.  
  62.  
  63. >>> *In order to use "OR" you need to ASSUME the claim being tested*! <<<
  64.  
  65.  
  66.  
  67. If we use "OR":
  68.  
  69.  
  70.  
  71. a) Jeranism posted an authentic "EVA" video *but it could be "NASA" fake their EVAs*.
  72.  
  73.  
  74.  
  75. b) There are no scuba divers during EVAs *but it could be that "Jeranism" used a fake video*.
  76.  
  77.  
  78.  
  79. (Either way it becomes POSSIBLE for scuba-divers to be visible/present.)
  80.  
  81.  
  82.  
  83. Whereas when we use "AND":
  84.  
  85.  
  86.  
  87. *"No scuba-divers are used during EVAs AND 'Jeranism' used a genuine video of an EVA"*.
  88.  
  89.  
  90.  
  91. This leaves no wiggle room or way out.
  92.  
  93.  
  94.  
  95. *If we see "scuba-divers" during the "Jeranism" video then we simply check the "NASA" archives to see that they aren't present*. Then the video "Jeranism" posted can be *dismissed as fake* and his audience becomes *forced to accept it* else be revealed as stupid or dishonest.
  96.  
  97.  
  98.  
  99. You still have not understood this most simple of concepts. I cannot be bothered explaining this any further. _All the best_.
  100.  
  101.  
  102. ______________________________________________________________
  103. My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.
  104.  
  105. Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
  106. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w
  107.  
  108. Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
  109. https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ
  110.  
  111. Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
  112. https://twitter.com/LestaNediam
  113.  
  114. Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
  115. https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta
  116.  
  117. What does not exist - exists to exist.
  118. What exists - exists to always exist.
  119. As it is written - so it is done.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Public Pastes
We use cookies for various purposes including analytics. By continuing to use Pastebin, you agree to our use of cookies as described in the Cookies Policy.  OK, I Understand
Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!