Advertisement
Guest User

Untitled

a guest
Dec 6th, 2018
295
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 61.04 KB | None | 0 0
  1. So here are the logs of the conversation I had with Sean before he soon after permabanned me for making a joke in a "serious thread".
  2.  
  3. I added some comments to identify and count the logical falacies (LF1-41) that he, Laz, and Vaex uttered until the point when I told them that they debate like children.
  4.  
  5. To make it clear... the conversation continued endlessly not because I was "forcing" anyone (as if I had any power to do that) to change an ID, but because I couldn't get him to at least understand (or to stop intentionally misrepresenting) what I was saying. I should probably add that my trade or mining chars have never blown up by Xenos for as long as I can remember, and that I didn't ask for the change for me personally (as they keep pretending I do) but because it's part of a larger problem in discovery, which is restrictions which arguably made sense when we had an overpopulation problem, but which now have no more positive effects besides the negative ones.
  6.  
  7.  
  8. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  9. Been raged at so much for telling people to drop all their cargo or die
  10. have had multiple try to explain to me that credit demands would be more reasonable as a xeno
  11.  
  12. communist squid08.11.2018
  13. everyone knows the counter to a xeno is to spam him with 1 million donations before he even says halt
  14.  
  15. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  16. I don't fly xenos for money
  17. I fly xenos for blue messages
  18. spamming me money doesn't change that
  19.  
  20. communist squid08.11.2018
  21. fly xenos to be blue messaged*
  22. that rep will get you whacked
  23.  
  24. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  25. I dunno
  26. It should
  27. but caps can't kill fighters
  28.  
  29. Foxglove08.11.2018
  30. Credit demand
  31. Xeno
  32. laughs in extremist
  33.  
  34. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  35. it's the most irritating thing in the world to have to explain that if you made a credit demand you'd get sanctioned
  36. cause the reply is invariably "but it would have been better than telling me to drop my cargo"
  37.  
  38. communist squid08.11.2018
  39. loss of guns and sanction notice in your hold
  40. laugh in denis
  41.  
  42. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  43. Denis is so nice
  44.  
  45. communist squid08.11.2018
  46. denis is chill until you are on the receiving end of the admin stick for being idiotic
  47. tbh
  48. should just cargo demand all ore traders
  49. Thats the gallic tactic anyways
  50. since ore is regulated by gallia laws
  51. GRN can just roll into Dublin and shit on the bad indie BMMs
  52.  
  53. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  54. It might be wrong
  55. but if I'm allowed to demand cargo
  56. don't think your shitty credit bribe will stop me
  57. I want those materials
  58.  
  59. communist squid08.11.2018
  60. XEENERS are poor as shit and very redneck
  61.  
  62. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  63. I'm going to keep pirating those pob suppliers for their RA
  64.  
  65. communist squid08.11.2018
  66. also no gbs
  67.  
  68. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  69. eventually I will have a reinforced ship
  70.  
  71. Foxglove08.11.2018
  72. My nigga Phil
  73.  
  74. Karlotta08.11.2018
  75. why is it even forbidden to ask for credits on a xeno
  76. if its that counter-intuitive
  77.  
  78. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  79. it's not counter-intuitive...
  80. Xeno's hate foreigners. Unless you decide to shoot liberty corp ships, your only targets are foreigners and lawfuls
  81. why would you allow them in for the low price of a bribe if you hate them?
  82.  
  83. Phil08.11.2018
  84. @Foxglove swiggety swooty
  85.  
  86. Foxglove08.11.2018
  87. :100:
  88.  
  89. VÆX08.11.2018
  90. Hai Phil!
  91.  
  92. Phil08.11.2018
  93. Sup Vex
  94.  
  95. VÆX08.11.2018
  96. I cooked some Bacon & Eggs :stuck_out_tongue:
  97. Now checking out what's up in forums
  98.  
  99. Phil08.11.2018
  100. Cool beans
  101. ...or eggs in your case
  102.  
  103. VÆX08.11.2018
  104. Yeah, gonna get to my pasta later...
  105. Yesterday I experimented with herbs and spices and made a delicious Pasta Bolognese
  106. Ate 3 bowls in a row :smile:
  107.  
  108. Karlotta08.11.2018
  109. you can rob people you hate, you know?
  110. its a hostile act
  111.  
  112. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  113. I'd rather act accordingly and not let them in places where I don't want them
  114. which is why its called extremism
  115.  
  116. Karlotta08.11.2018
  117. you can do that too
  118. most extremists finance their cause by robbing banks
  119. RAF did
  120. NSU did
  121. its just stupid and useless to make something against the rules for no good reason
  122. not only xenos
  123. its the "we gotta nerf this ID or it will be OP" mentality that got that line for xenos in like 2009 or 2010
  124. same mentality was applied to many IDs that people feared would become too popular
  125. now we have lots of IDs nerfed with useless stupid lines
  126.  
  127. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  128. "oh no"
  129.  
  130. Foxglove08.11.2018
  131. From a gameplay pov, the Xenos trade in piracy and caps for the ability to shoot transports without a demand. I do think it is a balancing act. Give the Xenos the ability to pirate and they essentially are better Lane Hackers, who also don't have caps.
  132. It would eliminate distinctiveness between faction IDs.
  133.  
  134. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  135. Make freelancer freelancers again
  136. that way no one can complain about things not being exactly the same
  137.  
  138. Karlotta08.11.2018
  139. dont lane hackers have GBs and the Spyglass BS?
  140.  
  141. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  142. GB yes
  143. bs no
  144. haven't had that for
  145. ages
  146.  
  147. Karlotta08.11.2018
  148. I though I saw some RP revolving around the spyglass recently
  149. whatever
  150. point is
  151. "nerf this ID so its not better than that ID" is a bad policy
  152. better make the other ID better
  153. like give LH a larger ZOI (for example)
  154.  
  155. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  156. Wrong
  157. firstly, wrong about how ID's are handled
  158.  
  159. Karlotta08.11.2018
  160. everywhere where therea are trade lanes, for example
  161.  
  162. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  163. secondly, simply buffing id's automatically nerfs other id's
  164.  
  165. Karlotta08.11.2018
  166. well that's what fox said
  167. no it doesnt
  168.  
  169. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  170. Sure it does
  171.  
  172. Karlotta08.11.2018
  173. relatively to player attractivity yes, absolutely no
  174.  
  175. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  176. why do you fly GRI and not GRP?
  177.  
  178. Karlotta08.11.2018
  179. the thing is when you nerf stuff you make the game more unatractive too
  180.  
  181. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  182. Ok let me explain it simple
  183. If we made LH have a ZOI where ever Lanes are
  184.  
  185. VÆX08.11.2018
  186. Nerfs and Buffs go hand in hand Karlotta, that equals Balance...
  187.  
  188. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  189. That automatically nerfs other ID's
  190. because now the LH are better than them
  191.  
  192. Karlotta08.11.2018
  193. thats not a real nerf though
  194.  
  195. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  196. Other ID's are now weaker
  197.  
  198. Karlotta08.11.2018
  199. a real nerf would keep people from doing stuff
  200.  
  201. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  202. you have successfully nerfed by buffing
  203. which is a common thing in gaming these days
  204.  
  205. Karlotta08.11.2018
  206. in terms of relative attractivity, not absolute attractivity
  207.  
  208. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  209. E.G: Riot
  210.  
  211. Karlotta08.11.2018
  212. if you restrict players, you make not only their faction more unattractive, you make the game more unattractive too
  213. a better trade would be "give both Xenos and LH more rights"
  214.  
  215. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  216. Good thing there are literally enough ID's to cover all the niches, and failing that, the ability to have an ID added
  217.  
  218. Karlotta08.11.2018
  219. "nerf both so they are equally unattractive" makes the game worse
  220.  
  221. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  222. Sorry, but giving people specific things to do isn't a nerf
  223. Am I making the game worse by saying USI shouldn't have battleship access
  224. cause I'm restricting players
  225. I'm the problem
  226.  
  227.  
  228. COMMENT: LF1: False Equivalence "giving specific things to do" is not the same as "taking away specific things", which you do when you take away the ability to ask for credits. LF2: False equivalence/strawman. Giving a trade faction that is IRP protected by the LN is not the same as giving an unlawful faction the ability to ask for credits (they can already ask for cargo) from their enemies (or a larger ZOI) and is not what I'm asking for.
  229.  
  230. Karlotta08.11.2018
  231. forbidding people from robbing them for credits is a nerf, and it's counter intuitive, as has been demonstrated by the fact that people ask for them anyway
  232. you're taking away things to do, not giving it
  233.  
  234. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  235. I don't ever see Xeno's ask for credits
  236. I've never seen xeno's complain about it
  237.  
  238.  
  239. VÆX08.11.2018
  240. ^
  241.  
  242. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  243. the factions who play xeno's have never had issue with it
  244. thonk
  245. Could it be, that you're complaining about something that isn't an issue?
  246.  
  247. COMMENT: LF3: Argument from silence: Assuming something isnt true because you havent heard anyone/authority figures say it before
  248.  
  249.  
  250. Karlotta08.11.2018
  251. You said:
  252. "Been raged at so much for telling people to drop all their cargo or die
  253. have had multiple try to explain to me that credit demands would be more reasonable as a xeno
  254. ...
  255. I don't fly xenos for money
  256. I fly xenos for blue messages
  257. spamming me money doesn't change that
  258.  
  259. communist squidheute um 07:52 Uhr
  260. fly xenos to be blue messaged*
  261. that rep will get you whacked
  262. ...
  263. it's the most irritating thing in the world to have to explain that if you made a credit demand you'd get sanctioned
  264. cause the reply is invariably "but it would have been better than telling me to drop my cargo"
  265.  
  266. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  267. Yes, but its not the ID or the Xeno's fault that people don't want their power trading interrupted
  268. It's quite clear that the victim wants the rule breach when the xeno wants a kill instead
  269.  
  270. Karlotta08.11.2018
  271. I'm not saying dont allow them to kill the trader
  272. I'm saying dont forbid xenos to ask for credits
  273.  
  274. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  275. why
  276.  
  277. Karlotta08.11.2018
  278. I explained it
  279.  
  280. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  281. Give me the lore reason
  282.  
  283. COMMENT: LF4: Moving the goalposts from "gameplay" to "lore".
  284.  
  285. Karlotta08.11.2018
  286. you nerf not only the ID, but the whole mod
  287.  
  288. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  289. I mean
  290.  
  291. Karlotta08.11.2018
  292. extremists need credits to fund their cause. Thats why
  293.  
  294. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  295. They get that from liberty(bearbeitet)
  296. I don't need to pirate samura for money when USI funds me under the table already(bearbeitet)
  297. So no, thats not sufficient reasoning to change the lore of xeno's
  298.  
  299. COMMENT: LF5: False equivalence. Letting Xenos ask for credits in addition to cargo is not "changing the lore" but a small detail (credits in addition to cargo) in one of the means they use to an ends.
  300.  
  301. Karlotta08.11.2018
  302. but its enough reasoning to make the game less counter intuitive, restricted, and rule-lawyery
  303.  
  304. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  305. In your drive to make everything Thanos worthy, you'll remove the uniqueness of the game, and ultimately, return us to the days of Liberty navy flying Wraiths, because without restrictions people will only care about how they can best utilize not having limits
  306. Why would I want to play an Order when Zoners are allowed full shipline access and nomad engagement rights sirius wide?
  307.  
  308. COMMENT: LF6: "Thanos worthy" ad hominem/apeal to ridicule LF7: Non sequitur/Strawman, Allowing Xenos to ask for credits and giving lane hackers a larger ID does not imply that you have to let Liberty Navy fly wraiths. It's like saying "if we legalize weed we have to legalize crack and I dont want to legalize crack"
  309.  
  310.  
  311. Karlotta08.11.2018
  312. liberty flying wraiths is counter-intuitive
  313. xenos asking for credits is not
  314.  
  315. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  316. Why are you restricting players from flying wraiths
  317. It's a better statted ship
  318. it makes sense for navies to want it
  319.  
  320. COMMENT: LF8: continues to strawman
  321.  
  322. Karlotta08.11.2018
  323. plus the official factions and srp people already fly those combos. BAF flying Core stuff for example
  324. becasue irp its built by rheinland and liberty wants its independence
  325.  
  326. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  327. Are you telling me that there are already way to get around restrictions in the game, long integrated?
  328.  
  329. Karlotta08.11.2018
  330. thats more of an irp reason than to forbid extremeist for asking for credits to hurt their enemies and finance their cause
  331.  
  332. COMMENT: "that" refers to liberty wanting a military force that is independent from rheinland
  333.  
  334. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  335. Again, if Xeno's are largely caused by foreign trade removing liberty jobs, stealing credits from those same foreigners to allow them to pass and trade in liberty has not achieved their stated goal
  336.  
  337. VÆX08.11.2018
  338. "The Nomad Vagrants/Xeno discussion chat"
  339.  
  340. Laz08.11.2018
  341. Xeno
  342. : )
  343.  
  344. VÆX08.11.2018
  345. Zeno
  346.  
  347. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  348. Zenophobia
  349.  
  350. Karlotta08.11.2018
  351. it can, if you hurt foreign corps that way, and gain more credits to get the means to hurt them even more
  352.  
  353. Phil08.11.2018
  354. Xylophone
  355.  
  356. VÆX08.11.2018
  357. :face_palm:
  358.  
  359. Laz08.11.2018
  360. Phil you penismonger
  361.  
  362. Phil08.11.2018
  363. Stfu Laz
  364. U a cuck
  365.  
  366. Laz08.11.2018
  367. I showed you my RP plz respond
  368.  
  369. VÆX08.11.2018
  370. How long is your RP?
  371.  
  372. Karlotta08.11.2018
  373. even isis and taliban dont only kill westerners. They also capture and release them for ransom money
  374.  
  375. Phil08.11.2018
  376. I'm gonna flash my USB stick
  377.  
  378. Laz08.11.2018
  379. When the beep goes too deep
  380.  
  381. VÆX08.11.2018
  382. xD
  383.  
  384. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  385. Your arguments fail to persuade me as Xeno funding is already covered by their lore.
  386. I don't need to shift my ideology to fund myself when thats being taken care of by people I'm working to protect the jobs of
  387.  
  388. Karlotta08.11.2018
  389. people have more than one income source?
  390. expecially criminals
  391. you dont need to shift your ideology
  392.  
  393. VÆX08.11.2018
  394. Well, USI is rich af, they fund pretty nicely :slight_smile:
  395.  
  396. Laz08.11.2018
  397. Lore = Covered
  398. find a gameplay reason to get your point across
  399.  
  400. COMMENT: LF9: Moving the goalposts back to gameplay
  401.  
  402. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  403. I'm sorry that you are more morally loose than criminals and would undermine your goals to achieve more cash to achieve your goals
  404.  
  405. COMMENT: LF10+LF11: non sequitur+ad hominem falacy, pretending my interpretation of irp criminal behavior and observations of oorp actual criminal behavior is my actual oorp standpoint on morals
  406.  
  407. Karlotta08.11.2018
  408. you can still use the credits you made to blow up traders in situations where it makes more sense
  409.  
  410. VÆX08.11.2018
  411. There are LR, LH , indie Pirates, and even UN in Texas for credit demands
  412.  
  413. Karlotta08.11.2018
  414. but you DONT undermine your goals by asking for cash
  415.  
  416. VÆX08.11.2018
  417. Xenoes are terrorists
  418. Funded by USI
  419.  
  420. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  421. Hey Vex gets it
  422.  
  423. Karlotta08.11.2018
  424. you jsut give yourself another tool to achieve your goals
  425.  
  426. Laz08.11.2018
  427. Going down your pat of logic, Xenos should be able to demand cash and then kill their targets anyway because muh lore reasons
  428.  
  429. COMMENT: LF12 Non sequitur/strawman. Lifting an ID restriction does not have to involve being allowed to violate server rules, or lifting them.
  430.  
  431. Karlotta08.11.2018
  432. no, that would be against rules
  433.  
  434. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  435. No I don't. By allowing that kusari trader to continue trading, I have compromised the livelihoods of fellow libertonians who can't compete with the import of exotic goods.
  436.  
  437. Karlotta08.11.2018
  438. you can either make a demand or blow them up
  439.  
  440. Felsvar08.11.2018
  441. In reality, it would be that way @Laz
  442.  
  443. Karlotta08.11.2018
  444. its not mutually exclusive
  445.  
  446. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  447. As such, I have compromised my goals, and as a result I am not an extremist that would be a xeno
  448. I could rather play a rogue with a case of xenophobia if I wanted to pirate foreigners
  449.  
  450. Karlotta08.11.2018
  451. but you can ruin his profit, and use his credits to expand your capabilities
  452.  
  453. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  454. I'd also get gunboats and cruisers that way
  455.  
  456. COMMENT: LF13: Non sequitur/strawman
  457.  
  458. Karlotta08.11.2018
  459. taliban do it. isis does it. RAF and NSU did it
  460.  
  461. Laz08.11.2018
  462. That's my point Felsvar, but we're talking about rules here, and Karlotta is trying to justify rules being changed because of lore.
  463.  
  464. COMMENT: LF14: strawman/moving goalposts. I was initially justifying changing rules not because of lore, but justifying lifting ID restrictions to make the game less rulelawyery/sanctionbaity, restricted, and sanctionbaity/rulelawyers, and now showing that the (lore) arguments brought forward (after Sean asked to move the goalpost to lore) to justify the restriction are not valid.
  465.  
  466. VÆX08.11.2018
  467. Karlotta, in one sentence:
  468. "The Xenos are an ultranationalist terrorist group in Liberty who focus on the expulsion of foreigners. They prefer to hit foreign shippers instead of Liberty shippers, and prefer to destroy rather then steal."
  469.  
  470. Karlotta08.11.2018
  471. I'm telling you that nerfing IDs on make-shift lore reasons made sense when we had 200 players every night and more players than factions. Now that we have more factions than players, nerfin IDs like this makes no sense anymore
  472.  
  473. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  474. Vex, you're not allowed to use lore in this argument. It goes against the concept of making everything the same
  475. It's not a nerf
  476. it's a style of play
  477. play a rogue if you want to pirate for credits
  478. play a xeno if you want to be a extremist
  479. Theres literally nothing stopping you
  480.  
  481. COMMENT: LF15: Strawman/ridicule: I'm not arguing in favor of making everything the same, I'm arguing of lifting some restrictions which are now counterproductive
  482.  
  483. Felsvar08.11.2018
  484. Or become none
  485.  
  486. Laz08.11.2018
  487. Hey Sean, can you grab me that ini file of Alley Station now? :)))
  488.  
  489. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  490. asdonapifbnasoi[dbsofgjsf
  491.  
  492. Felsvar08.11.2018
  493. Chsjdudjeoskdoqkzkdjcnd92oet8dn soxv
  494.  
  495. Laz08.11.2018
  496. :hearts:
  497.  
  498. Karlotta08.11.2018
  499. maybe some people like to play a faction because they like its RP, not because they like its rule permissions and cant do the stuff on the RP they actually like
  500.  
  501. COMMENT: Factions can have different lore backgrounds even if they have the same permissions. That and Xenos and Rogues can still have differences like ZOI and "may blow up transports without demand" even if they can both demand credits
  502.  
  503. VÆX08.11.2018
  504. Well, exactly why I pasted that...If you want credit demands and piracy, play a Rogue/Hacker or indie pirate...If you want to roleplay an extremist go for 555-ZENOES
  505.  
  506. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  507. Everytime you ask me for help I delete another of your assets laz
  508. Maybe you can RP without worrying about being optimized
  509. Like the rest of the server
  510.  
  511. Laz08.11.2018
  512. My assets are infinite
  513.  
  514. Karlotta08.11.2018
  515. I'm not asking this for me
  516.  
  517. COMMENT: Answering to VAEX here
  518.  
  519. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  520. stop being discovery thanos and demanding everything be exactly the way you require it
  521.  
  522. COMMENT: LF16: apeal to motive and ad hominem. I'm not asking for it because I want to ask credits as a Xeno, I'm asking for it to make the game less rulelawyery/sanctionbaity, restricted, and counter-intuitive
  523.  
  524. Karlotta08.11.2018
  525. I'm asking it for everyone
  526.  
  527. Laz08.11.2018
  528. ShepShep.png
  529.  
  530. Phil08.11.2018
  531. No Laz is a toaster boi. Worrying about optimization is what he does.
  532.  
  533. VÆX08.11.2018
  534. Karlotta, what part of extremist/terrorist did you not understand?
  535.  
  536. COMMENT: LF17: Argument from repetition. I had already answered several times that extremist/terrorists also use robery and kidnapping as a way to increase their capabilities (NSU, RAF, Taliban, ISIS).
  537.  
  538. Karlotta08.11.2018
  539. ran out of arguments, here come the memes and the ad hominems
  540.  
  541. COMMENT: refering to laz meme and Sean's apeal to motive ad hominem
  542.  
  543. Felsvar08.11.2018
  544. Horrible selfie Sheperd had
  545.  
  546. Laz08.11.2018
  547. I'll have you know, I was meming from the start because I do not care for your opinion <3
  548.  
  549. Karlotta08.11.2018
  550. what part of "terrorist/extremists" rob people for money too dont you understand?
  551.  
  552. VÆX08.11.2018
  553. No memes, you just argue for the sake of arguing, I simply don't get it...
  554. I've never seen Xeno faction members or even indies complain about their ID lines
  555.  
  556. COMMENT: LF18: Another apeal to motive, argument from silence, repetition
  557.  
  558. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  559. What part of they don't need to
  560. Like
  561. If you had an actual case
  562. of xenos not being funded
  563. sure
  564. you make sense
  565. instead
  566. they are funded by one of the big three
  567. why the fuck would they pirate some shitty trader who has a ten year old ship
  568.  
  569. COMMENT: LF19: generalization from cherry picking
  570.  
  571. Karlotta08.11.2018
  572. as if they only pirate traders who had a ten year old ship
  573.  
  574. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  575. No but it doesnt matter
  576. name a single trader with more purchasing power than the fucking USI
  577.  
  578. Karlotta08.11.2018
  579. yeah... everything that contradicts you doesnt matter
  580.  
  581. Felsvar08.11.2018
  582. selling popcorns!! :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
  583.  
  584. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  585. Like you're legit ignoring lore to try prove a point that is well covered by
  586. lore
  587. Canon
  588. lore
  589.  
  590. Karlotta08.11.2018
  591. if USI has unlimited cash and the others are so insignificant, why do they need the xenos to blow them up?`
  592.  
  593. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  594. It's called removing the competition
  595.  
  596. Karlotta08.11.2018
  597. but if they have unlimited cash according to you, why do they need that?
  598.  
  599. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  600. Oh I never said they had unlimited cash. I said they have more than any random trader that the xenos shoot
  601. which, by the way, is true
  602.  
  603. Karlotta08.11.2018
  604. but they can give unlimited cash to the xenos, apparently
  605.  
  606. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  607. Again, never said unlimited cash
  608. for someone who likes to claim people make up things, you do a lot of putting words in peoples mouths
  609.  
  610. Felsvar08.11.2018
  611. Ouufff!
  612.  
  613. Karlotta08.11.2018
  614. xenos dont only shoot random traders. Samura, Kishiro, Dauman, Kruger, Gateway, and so on are major players too
  615. you said they dont need more cash.
  616.  
  617. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  618. They don't
  619.  
  620. Karlotta08.11.2018
  621. that pretty much implies unlimited cash
  622.  
  623. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  624. But what I actually said was
  625. They wouldnt accept money from people they are ideologically opposed to when funded by libertonians
  626. which are part of the big three
  627. so its not like theres not a ton of cash being moved
  628.  
  629. Karlotta08.11.2018
  630. they're not "accepting" money. They're ROBBING them
  631.  
  632. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  633. I can kill you and rob the body
  634.  
  635. Karlotta08.11.2018
  636. and I never said dont allow them to blow up traders
  637.  
  638. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  639. I don't need to leave you alive
  640.  
  641. VÆX08.11.2018
  642. Throws some money to Felsvar for two popcorns
  643.  
  644. Karlotta08.11.2018
  645. jsut let them ALSO be able to rob them
  646.  
  647. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  648. I don't need you to give me money, cause rulewise, I can now no longer shoot you
  649. undermining my goals as an extremist
  650.  
  651. Karlotta08.11.2018
  652. I can no longer shoot you after I asked for money and you paid
  653.  
  654. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  655. Why add a line that contravenes half of the faction lore
  656.  
  657. COMMENT: another cherry picking generalization: It's a tiny detail of hte faction lore, not "half the lore"
  658.  
  659. Karlotta08.11.2018
  660. if I aske for money and you pay, THEN I cant
  661. but if I dont ask for money, then I can shoot you
  662.  
  663. Felsvar08.11.2018
  664. Grab some!! :popcorn: :popcorn:
  665.  
  666. Karlotta08.11.2018
  667. its very simple
  668.  
  669. VÆX08.11.2018
  670. Gosh, Karlotta, please...How hard is it to understand Xenoes role in Liberty?
  671.  
  672. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  673. No, cause you've still not explained why the xeno's should be made into worse rogues
  674.  
  675. COMMENT: LF21: Strawman. I don't want to make xenos into worse rogues. The Lore and Motivations are still largely different.
  676.  
  677. Karlotta08.11.2018
  678. your faciton lore of xenos not needing money doesnt make sense
  679.  
  680. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  681. "Why would I want to play an Order when Zoners are allowed full shipline access and nomad engagement rights sirius wide?"
  682.  
  683. That's a good question :thinking:(bearbeitet)
  684.  
  685. Laz08.11.2018
  686. so simple. you can see that by everyone disagreeing with you
  687.  
  688. COMMENT: LF22: Apeal to majority
  689.  
  690. Karlotta08.11.2018
  691. and was introduced by people, just like it can be removed by people
  692.  
  693. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  694. I never even added the part where zoners will have better rep nearly everywhere as well Lyth
  695.  
  696. VÆX08.11.2018
  697. I mean, there are far more controversial topics to be discussed, rather than forcing opinions to break Xenoes role in Liberty
  698.  
  699. COMMENT: LF22 Argument by repetition+ strawman. I repeatedly adressed why xenophobic nationalists would rob people, and that there are many examples where they do, so it's not really "breaking role". LF23: apeal to "there are worse problems"
  700.  
  701. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  702. Yeah I think every ID being able to shoot Nomads everywhere is a bit silly
  703.  
  704. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  705. It's zoi locked
  706.  
  707. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  708. I guess it hasn't been "abused" yet, but there's huge room for it
  709.  
  710. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  711. Zoners, Freelancers and Pirates don't have ZOI
  712.  
  713. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  714. It makes Order ID moot
  715.  
  716. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  717. so they get sirius wide rights
  718.  
  719. VÆX08.11.2018
  720. It's not that everybody wants to disagree with you as you see it, it's just plain arguing for the sake of arguing...
  721.  
  722. COMMENT: LF24: apeal to motive ad hominem
  723.  
  724. Karlotta08.11.2018
  725. "break xenos role" is your opinion based on how other players made it becaise of hte situation they were in 10 years ago. That situation changed
  726.  
  727. COMMENT: I should have said "other people" like before, or more precisely "other admins"
  728.  
  729. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  730. It would be kind of funny to hunt down Duks sirius wide with Nephs tho
  731.  
  732. Laz08.11.2018
  733. No it's what literally everyone else is saying here Karlotta
  734.  
  735. COMMENT: LF25: Apeal to majority
  736.  
  737. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  738. Secret Zoner Nomad Hunting Society
  739. New faction
  740.  
  741. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  742. You've provided no reasons for why we should change the xeno lore to allow you to be worse rogues
  743.  
  744. COMMENT: I had provided mutliple reasons in gameplay as well as lore: Make game less rulelawyery/sanctionbaity, restricted, and counterintuitive. The the counter-argument "they are terrorists" is not valid because terroists need money to work towards their goals too (confirmed by rl examples). The reason "they dont need more money" is not valid because the reason USI Xenos is because of trade profits of foreigners over libertonians. In other words: because of USI lost money from foreign trade. I also didnt ask to make "Xenos into worse Rogues". Xenos are still motivated in their hatred of foreigners even if they also rob foreigners so they can expand their capabilites. Rogues can still be motivated by simple greed/rebelion against autority. LF26: repetition of stawman "turn xenos into worse rogues"
  745.  
  746. Karlotta08.11.2018
  747. "everyone else says it to it must be right" is a logical falacy, you know?`
  748.  
  749. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  750. You claim that its simple, but like I said, play a rogue if you want to be libertonian pirating for cash
  751.  
  752. COMMENT: LF27: Argument from repetition. The difference in background/rp does not disappear when ID permissions are the same, and players can have rp preferences, not jsut ID permission preferences
  753.  
  754. VÆX08.11.2018
  755. Xenoes = Terrorists/Extremists, not pirates
  756. LR/LH = Pirates , while LH's focus is gaining massive intel alongside piracy to fund their goals
  757.  
  758. COMMENT: LF28: More repetion of things I adressed. Also, Xenos can already pirate cargo
  759.  
  760. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  761. instead of spreading that role to people who have a different lore background
  762.  
  763. Laz08.11.2018
  764. Zoner Owned Nomad Eradication Raiders
  765. @Lythrilux
  766. Z.O.N.E.R.
  767.  
  768. Karlotta08.11.2018
  769. now you just repeat something I already adressed, to change the subject, sean(bearbeitet)
  770.  
  771. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  772. I said it several times already
  773. you not being able to read is not my failing
  774.  
  775. COMMENT: I adressed every one of his points, but they just repeat themselves without providing factually accurate counter-arguments to my replies
  776.  
  777. VÆX08.11.2018
  778. Why can't Zoners demand credits or cargo?
  779. Buff Zoners please
  780. Same argument
  781.  
  782. COMMENT: LF29: false equivalence and strawman. Allowing terrorists (who are unlawfuls anyway) to rob people is not the same as allowing a lawful or quasi-lawful ID to rob people
  783.  
  784. Laz08.11.2018
  785. Zoners need funding to live
  786. no rp where they get funding from
  787.  
  788. Karlotta08.11.2018
  789. because Zoners arent criminals
  790.  
  791. Laz08.11.2018
  792. let them engage people
  793.  
  794. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  795. Zoners should be allowed to attack all houses
  796.  
  797. VÆX08.11.2018
  798. And Xenoes aren't pirates either Karlotta
  799.  
  800. COMMENT: Yet they can pirate for cargo.
  801.  
  802. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  803. their backstory is they don't want to pay taxes
  804.  
  805. Karlotta08.11.2018
  806. because players dont expect zoners to
  807.  
  808. COMMENT: replying to VAEX and Laz zoner posts
  809.  
  810. Laz08.11.2018
  811.  
  812.  
  813. Karlotta08.11.2018
  814. NSU, RAF, isis, and taliband werent pirates either. But they all robbed their enemies and asked for ransom money too
  815.  
  816. COMMENT: Replying to Vaex's "And Xenoes aren't pirates either Karlotta"
  817.  
  818. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  819. Wait
  820. next is Karlotta explaining how CR came from a different galaxy
  821. And then using a real life analog(bearbeitet)
  822.  
  823. COMMENT: LF30: strawman, apeal to ridicule. putting words about CR in my mouth to then use those as an ad hominem
  824.  
  825. Karlotta08.11.2018
  826. different sector
  827.  
  828. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  829. To try make it make sense
  830.  
  831. Karlotta08.11.2018
  832. and you change thesubject again, with an ad hominem
  833.  
  834. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  835. No, I already told you that you haven't convinced me
  836.  
  837. VÆX08.11.2018
  838. :face_palm:
  839.  
  840. Karlotta08.11.2018
  841. I know I havent convinced you
  842.  
  843. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  844. I'm now asking you to explain where they came from if not from earth
  845.  
  846. Karlotta08.11.2018
  847. because you dont want to be convinced
  848. not because what you say makes sense
  849.  
  850. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  851. Sure
  852.  
  853. VÆX08.11.2018
  854. You don't want to understand Karlotta, and you wonder why people disagree with you
  855.  
  856. COMMENT: LF31: apeal to majority
  857.  
  858. Karlotta08.11.2018
  859. I did understand, and I showed you how your argument was wrong
  860.  
  861. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  862. I'll just go and tell the rest of the story team that the stuff we've written doesn't make sense to Karlotta, so we should drop it
  863. I've told you the canon lore. If you can't accept it, too bad.
  864.  
  865. COMMENT: LF32: Non sequitur and strawman. You don't need to rewrite xeno story or change canon lore. Allowing xenos to also ask for cash is not as contradictory to their "terrorist" role as Sean pretends, and was added for ID balancing reason more than canon lore reason
  866.  
  867. Karlotta08.11.2018
  868. then you start unpacking memes, ad hominems, changing the subject
  869.  
  870. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  871. Stop restricting my free speech.
  872. You've not told me why xenos should be worse rogues
  873.  
  874. Comment: LF31: moving the goal posts back to another strawman (that I already answered to) and argument from repetition. I already answered to it by saying xenos and rogues still have differences
  875.  
  876. Karlotta08.11.2018
  877. the stuff you've written is causing annoyance, like you have said at the start of the discussion
  878.  
  879. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  880. So I'm waiting for that still
  881.  
  882. Karlotta08.11.2018
  883. and it's also making hte game worse at hte point we are at
  884.  
  885. SurrenderTheArtifact08.11.2018
  886. 279 new messages :eyes:
  887.  
  888. Karlotta08.11.2018
  889. there was a reason why that was put there 10 years ago
  890. but that reason is no longer valid
  891.  
  892. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  893. Ok, so let me put it like this
  894.  
  895. Karlotta08.11.2018
  896. because population dropped
  897.  
  898. VÆX08.11.2018
  899. Nobody's trying to make you look wrong because of personal reasons Karlotta, It's just your opinions on the subject are irrelevant
  900.  
  901. COMMENT: LF32: apeal to authority and ad hominem
  902.  
  903. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  904. If I kill a power trader because they didnt give me all their cargo
  905. and they whine
  906.  
  907. VÆX08.11.2018
  908. Massively controversial to Xenoes role in Liberty...
  909.  
  910. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  911. Does it matter what ID I do it on?
  912. Should we remove all ID's being able to kill traders(bearbeitet)
  913.  
  914. COMMENT: LF33: Strawman. I never asked to remove the ability to kill traders for anyone
  915.  
  916. VÆX08.11.2018
  917. We have pirate factions in Liberty, play those, don't play Xenoes if you want Credit piracy
  918.  
  919. COMMENT: LF34: repetition
  920.  
  921. Karlotta08.11.2018
  922. and you said then you have to explain your ID
  923.  
  924. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  925. Cause thats the cause of the annoyance.
  926. Me killing people instead of allowing them to do what they could to survive
  927.  
  928. Karlotta08.11.2018
  929. vaex I already explained that I dont want to pirate as a xeno
  930.  
  931. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  932. I straight said I fly these factions for blue messages
  933.  
  934. Karlotta08.11.2018
  935. I want you guys to understand something
  936.  
  937. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  938. do you think that having a different ID line is going to stop the power trader to stop complaining?
  939.  
  940. COMMENT: I didnt answering that I'm still writing on another point. Answer: No but there will be less of the rule lawyering and sanction baiting that you also mentioned, and the rules will be less complex and counter-intuitive
  941.  
  942. Karlotta08.11.2018
  943. about creating useless restrictions that make the gmae worse and not better
  944.  
  945. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  946. I've had people try and bribe my nomad
  947.  
  948. Karlotta08.11.2018
  949. not always
  950.  
  951. VÆX08.11.2018
  952. I understand your points, but bringing up the server count to this discussion is not relevant to changing their entire lore
  953.  
  954. COMMENT: LF35 Strawman/cherry picking generalization. It's not changing the entire lore, and the server count matter because spreading players out among IDs no longer makes sense, and is counterprodcutive, when there are more IDs than players
  955.  
  956. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  957. should I have a can demand credits on nomad id's as well?
  958.  
  959. COMMENT: LF36: strawman, false equivalence, argumet from ridicule. (non wild) nomads dont irp use credits, xenos do
  960.  
  961. Karlotta08.11.2018
  962. but it will cause less annoyance even if it doesnt eliminate it altogether
  963.  
  964. VÆX08.11.2018
  965. Nomad Credits xD
  966.  
  967. Karlotta08.11.2018
  968. vaex its not changing their entire lore
  969.  
  970. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  971. Yes it is
  972. I am playing one way
  973. they target doesnt want me to
  974.  
  975. Karlotta08.11.2018
  976. its changine a small detail of it, in a way that makes it more logical
  977. and less annoying
  978.  
  979. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  980. You are proof that few things in life are as logical as they seem
  981.  
  982. COMMENT: LF37: Ad hominem
  983.  
  984. Karlotta08.11.2018
  985. I'*m not saying I dont want you to play the way you want sean
  986.  
  987. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  988. Yes you are
  989.  
  990. Karlotta08.11.2018
  991. I'm saying dont tell OTHERS not to play the way THEY want
  992.  
  993. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  994. So
  995.  
  996. Karlotta08.11.2018
  997. you can blow him up
  998.  
  999. VÆX08.11.2018
  1000. So by your logic, let's give all Liberty based factions including Hellfire piracy rights
  1001.  
  1002. COMMENT: LF38 Strawman from non squitur (for "all liberty based factions")
  1003.  
  1004. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1005. but dont tell others they cant ask for credits
  1006.  
  1007. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1008. you are telling me that I shouldn't play the way I want(bearbeitet)
  1009. because I played to my ID
  1010.  
  1011. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1012. no vaex, that's another logical falacy
  1013.  
  1014. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1015. and it inconvenienced someone else also playing to their ID
  1016.  
  1017. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1018. (strawman and non sequitur)
  1019.  
  1020. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1021. Instead, we should change my ID, so that I can play it the way they want me to, if I feel like it
  1022. how is that logical?
  1023.  
  1024. COMMENT: LF39: Strawman. I'm not telling him to ask for credits, I'm telling him that I think he and others should be allowed to
  1025.  
  1026. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1027. Im not telling you to change how oyu play
  1028.  
  1029. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1030. No you are
  1031.  
  1032. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1033. no Im not
  1034.  
  1035. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1036. You want the Xeno ID to have a more logical ID
  1037. by changing it
  1038.  
  1039. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1040. you can blow up the trader without asking for credsit if you want
  1041.  
  1042. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1043. to something that would allow me to play a different way
  1044. I can already do that
  1045. why change the ID
  1046.  
  1047. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1048. just dont ask others to not ask for credits
  1049.  
  1050. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1051. Fucking play an ID that can do it then
  1052. There are plenty in Liberty
  1053.  
  1054. COMMENT: LF40: more repetition
  1055.  
  1056. VÆX08.11.2018
  1057. ^
  1058.  
  1059. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1060. to make the mod less restrictive, illogical, and counter intuitive
  1061.  
  1062. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1063. Why take the niche of a faction for the sake of nothing
  1064. you add nothing with your approach
  1065.  
  1066. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1067. its not taking anything, its giving
  1068.  
  1069. VÆX08.11.2018
  1070. Thousand times said already...Xenoes need diversity to fill their role in Liberty.
  1071.  
  1072. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1073. You took a factions niche away from it
  1074.  
  1075. VÆX08.11.2018
  1076. ^
  1077. That
  1078.  
  1079. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1080. You're not adding anything to it
  1081.  
  1082. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1083. I'm adding diversity to xeno rp, not taking it
  1084. mom phone
  1085.  
  1086. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1087. No sorry you're not
  1088.  
  1089. VÆX08.11.2018
  1090. How would Xeno ID differ from LR then?
  1091.  
  1092. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1093. You are taking a ID that can not use gunboats and cruiser, and giving it a line that will make it compete with an ID that has both of those, plus more bases, and more friends in the region
  1094. you have removed the niche of a faction in your so claimed logical improvements.
  1095. You're not adding to it, you're making it compete with a now identical ID that has more going for it
  1096.  
  1097. COMMENT: LF41: inconsistent (before after) comparison. He's pretending that Xeno and Rogue IDs were not already competing before letting Xenos ask for credits too, and that giving Xenos more things to do makes the ID worse by only now starting a competiotion between the IDs. His argument is completely contradictory to logic now. He also pretty much gave up on trying to be logical after this and just spouts lines
  1098.  
  1099. VÆX08.11.2018
  1100. #LeaveXenoesAlone
  1101.  
  1102. SurrenderTheArtifact08.11.2018
  1103. As far as Xenos can target transports without making any demands
  1104. They look quite good for a faction that spreads terror
  1105. They also can demand any cargo
  1106.  
  1107. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1108. vaex the RP and lore is different
  1109. as are the enemies and unofficial allies
  1110. Sean, I'm not removing anything. Waht youR'e talking about is making another ID less attractive hoping players will go to your ID(bearbeitet)
  1111.  
  1112. COMMENT: Exactly as I stated in the very beginning of the argument
  1113.  
  1114. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1115. you seem to have confused yourself with me
  1116.  
  1117. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1118. If you want and ID to attract more players, make that ID more attractive, and dont nerf another ID
  1119.  
  1120. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1121. I'm not changing any ID's
  1122. thats your proposal
  1123.  
  1124. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1125. I'm adding things that will make the ID more attractive, you want to have stuff that makes it less attractive, more counter intuitive and annoying, restricing RP
  1126. it would be nice if you stopped argueing like a child
  1127. and address what I'm actually saying
  1128.  
  1129. COMMENT: This is after they used logical falacies 41 times. most of which were strawmen and ad hominems like "You are proof that few things in life are as logical as they seem" which I had ignored until then
  1130.  
  1131. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1132. If you can't be bothered to play by the lore in a roleplaying game, there is no point in claiming it will add to anything
  1133.  
  1134. COMMENT: LF42 ad homimen, strawman, cherry picking generalization. He uses the fact taht I want to change 1 small aspect of the "lore" (rather an ID line that doesnt really affect the lore at all) to paint me as someone who doesnt play by the lore in a role playing game
  1135.  
  1136. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1137. instead of jsut looking for stuff to answer so you dont hvae to give in
  1138.  
  1139. VÆX08.11.2018
  1140. Attractive as in breaking factions lore/niche and making an yet another, but inferior Pirate faction in Liberty.
  1141. That makes no sense
  1142.  
  1143. COMMENT: LF43 repetition of strawmen
  1144.  
  1145. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1146. it has absolutely nothign to do with not playin the role or the lore
  1147.  
  1148. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1149. I have addressed it. You have disregarded the story line and lore of a game to argue gameplay mechanics, which would be fine if we weren't here to roleplay
  1150.  
  1151. COMMENT: LF44 repetition of strawmen (based on incomplete comparison)
  1152.  
  1153. VÆX08.11.2018
  1154. It does...There should be diversity
  1155. And there is
  1156.  
  1157. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1158. giving it more rights does not make a faction inferior
  1159. again
  1160.  
  1161. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1162. it has everything to do with it. If I didn't care about the emergent stories, I would play other games.
  1163.  
  1164. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1165. not saying you cant blow ships up without asking for credits
  1166.  
  1167. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1168. Diluting things doesn't automatically make it better
  1169. Adding things for the sake of adding things is not improvement
  1170. its dilution and lazy
  1171.  
  1172. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1173. its not adding for hte sake of adding. Its adding for the sake of making the game more attractive and less annoying
  1174.  
  1175. VÆX08.11.2018
  1176. Okay I'm done...
  1177. And I ran out of :popcorn:
  1178.  
  1179. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1180. No, its not. It's adding for the sake of adding. There are already ID's that allow this. By tacking it onto everything else for the sake of less annoyance is a shit argument
  1181.  
  1182. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1183. but those IDs have a different lore and RP, and people have lore and RP preferences
  1184.  
  1185. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1186. Good, play by the established lore then.
  1187.  
  1188. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1189. RP isnt only ID permissions, you know
  1190.  
  1191. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1192. Stop trying to add things purely for the sake of adding them
  1193.  
  1194. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1195. I'm not
  1196. its for the sake of making the game more attractive
  1197.  
  1198. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1199. You've gone circular in your argument, to the point where you are now trying to defend your stance with something I've already said.
  1200.  
  1201. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1202. not for hte sake of addin thing randonly
  1203. you've got nothing left but to misrepresent my arguments
  1204.  
  1205. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1206. I've told you several times already, claiming that I've got nothing left when I've made my case and it has boiled down to you wanting to be right, doesn't mean you are right
  1207. You have said that your motives in this are because it would be
  1208.  
  1209. "KarlottaToday at 2:35 PM
  1210. its not adding for hte sake of adding. Its adding for the sake of making the game more attractive and less annoying"
  1211. You've not explained how that works when everyone in the debate has disagreed that it will do that other than its logical to you
  1212.  
  1213. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1214. "everyone disagrees" is a logical falacy
  1215. not an argument
  1216.  
  1217. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1218. Scroll up and find the person who agreed with you
  1219.  
  1220. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1221. it doesnt matter how many people agree
  1222.  
  1223. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1224. Show me where my sentence was misunderstood
  1225.  
  1226. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1227. it only matters if the arguments are valid or not
  1228.  
  1229. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1230. "everyone in the debate" if you're going to cherry pick, do it right.
  1231.  
  1232. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1233. you claim I'm taking things away or changing your rp
  1234. I'm not
  1235.  
  1236. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1237. People disagree, you can't explain why other than "its logical"
  1238.  
  1239. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1240. I'm giving you the possiblity to expand it
  1241.  
  1242. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1243. We've given reasons
  1244. you haven't
  1245.  
  1246. COMMENT: I've given multiple reasons which they never adressed but gish galloped from one argument to another in an endless cycle
  1247.  
  1248. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1249. you dont have to if you dont want to
  1250. no, you've given a bunch of logical falacies
  1251. strawmen, non sequiturs, ad hominems, calls to authority, calls to majority
  1252. you debate like a child
  1253.  
  1254. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1255. Alright, so you're both an idiot, and unable to provide the reason why ours are logical falacies when asked for the reasons.
  1256.  
  1257. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1258. I did
  1259.  
  1260. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1261. Show them to me
  1262.  
  1263. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1264. want me to do it again?
  1265.  
  1266. VÆX08.11.2018
  1267. Ugh, please, this debate gets this chat nowehere, Karlotta how about you make a proper thread on the Forums, and see how the community reacts to your arguments on the topic.
  1268. Because the way you interpret your reasons are illogical and lore-breaking.
  1269.  
  1270. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1271. "you are irrelevant" call to authority
  1272.  
  1273. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1274. No
  1275.  
  1276. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1277. "everyon disagrees with you " call to majority
  1278.  
  1279. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1280. I literally just asked you why our reasons were wrong
  1281.  
  1282. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1283. "you want to let ln fly rm ships" strawmen and non sequitur
  1284.  
  1285. VÆX08.11.2018
  1286. Nobody's siding with anybody, your reasons are just illogical
  1287. Make a thread, and see for yourself
  1288.  
  1289. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1290. I mean, I just asked to explain to me why our lore reasoning is a logical fallacy, and you couldn't even do that.
  1291.  
  1292. COMMENT: After I showed him examples of logical falacies the used, he moves the goal post to "show how one specific thing" is a logical falacy. (which is another logical falacy, I stopped counting at 41 or 42)
  1293.  
  1294. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1295. you said I'm asking you to change your rp. thats wrong
  1296. I said you're throwing logical falacies at me as if they were arguments
  1297.  
  1298. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1299. Congrats on changing the subject
  1300. Now give me the reason why the lore is a logical fallacy
  1301. like you claim it is
  1302.  
  1303. COMMENT: Now he moves the goal posts from "explain to me why our lore reasoning is a logical fallacy" to "now give me the reason why the lore is a logical fallacy"
  1304.  
  1305. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1306. your lore reasoning is wrong and illogical because robbing people and taking their credits is a valid tactic used by pretty much every terrorist organization there is
  1307. I directly answered your questions. You jsut chnage the question when ever I answer one
  1308.  
  1309. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1310. Alright, now go read the lore of the xeno's and tell me why its wrong for us to follow it
  1311.  
  1312. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1313. It's wrong of you to say that terrorists cant rob peopler for credits
  1314.  
  1315. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1316. Saying that these real life examples did a b and c is great, until you remember only you brought them up.
  1317.  
  1318. VÆX08.11.2018
  1319. Do you understand Diversity in factions Karlotta?
  1320.  
  1321. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1322. now oyu're just moving the goal posts from one post to the next
  1323.  
  1324. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1325. No, I'm presenting the issues with why no one will agree with you on this here
  1326.  
  1327. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1328. "do this do that" and when ever I do what you ask for you move the goal posts to something else
  1329.  
  1330. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  1331. Can't we all just get along
  1332.  
  1333. VÆX08.11.2018
  1334. We are getting along :slight_smile:
  1335.  
  1336. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1337. You claim we can't do say people can't do this, when all we've done is told you to play an ID that can do it instead of diluting another ID for it
  1338.  
  1339. COMMENT: Argument from repetition again. Again ignoring that I already gave several reasons why IDs should have more permissions: 1. Spreading players out among factions when there are more factions than players is counter productive 2. Having many restrictions in all IDs lowers the fun of playing as a whole 3. RP and lore is more than jsut "ID permission" and players will have conflicting preferences.
  1340.  
  1341. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1342. I'm not worried that here dont agree with me, because more of you are children who want to stick with the gang
  1343.  
  1344. VÆX08.11.2018
  1345. It's just...Explaining in my eyes...From both sides of the arguments
  1346.  
  1347. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1348. Ah yes, personal insults
  1349.  
  1350. COMMENT: Considering all the ad hominems they launched at me, calling them "children" for their inability to debate in a more mature manner is still mild.
  1351.  
  1352. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  1353. In the jungle the mighty jungle
  1354. The lion sleeps tonight
  1355.  
  1356. VÆX08.11.2018
  1357. No Karlotta, nobody's trying to prove you wrong for the sake of proving you wrong
  1358.  
  1359. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1360. I called you a child after yo ucalled me an idiot
  1361.  
  1362. VÆX08.11.2018
  1363. Your arguments are invalid, there's just that
  1364.  
  1365. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1366. now you complain
  1367.  
  1368. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1369. Actually you did it before I called you an idiot
  1370.  
  1371. COMMENT: I said "you debate like a child" after the 41st logical falacy, but only after receiving around 10 ad hominems from them
  1372.  
  1373. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1374. the way you argue it childish. thats a fact. You use one logical falacy after another
  1375.  
  1376. VÆX08.11.2018
  1377. :face_palm:
  1378.  
  1379. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1380. You've done all the things you claim we have
  1381.  
  1382. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1383. read up
  1384.  
  1385. VÆX08.11.2018
  1386. On Xeno lore
  1387.  
  1388. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1389. no I havent
  1390.  
  1391. VÆX08.11.2018
  1392. Yes
  1393. Plz
  1394.  
  1395. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1396. you just say what ever comes to your ahead without checking if its actually true
  1397. another childish trait
  1398. Vaex
  1399.  
  1400. VÆX08.11.2018
  1401. How mature Karlotta...Forcing your beliefs and illogical reasons on others...
  1402.  
  1403. COMMENT: Actually, I'm not forcing anyone to do anything, and neither would giving Xenos the OPTION to ask for credits.
  1404.  
  1405. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1406. your xeno lore was written by players
  1407. and it can be changed by players
  1408. its not the bible
  1409. or the qoran
  1410.  
  1411. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1412. You bring up irrelevant information to prove a point, referring to server population in a discussion about gameplay balance and lore. You bring up real life examples in a conversation about the lore environment of a game. You insist you are the only one thats right, which is a very immature thing to do, and you fail to see the irony in claiming people are childish when they will directly tell you they don't agree
  1413.  
  1414.  
  1415. COMMENT: "Irrelevant" because he obvously doesnt understand why it is relevant for balancing IDs to spread players out. The RL examples were examples that showed that their "terrorists/extremists dont ask their enemies for money" reasoning was wrong and my "terrorists can rob people to further their cause" was right. Insisting that logic and factual evidence go over majority opinion and considering the possilibity that every person can hold a wrong opinion is not "very immature", it's scientific. I didn't call people childish for not agreeing, I called their way of using logical falacies like call to authority childish. Pretending I call them childish for disagreeing with me is again a logical falacy (apeal to motive).
  1416.  
  1417. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  1418. Every post I make is a new chapter in the bible
  1419.  
  1420. VÆX08.11.2018
  1421. LythriBible
  1422.  
  1423. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1424. I've told you several times why I don't agree. Your reasoning to not agreeing is limited to "I think you're childish because you don't agree"
  1425.  
  1426. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1427. I'm not merely insisting I'm right, I'm giving actual arguments why I am
  1428.  
  1429. VÆX08.11.2018
  1430. Actual invalid arguments that is
  1431.  
  1432. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1433. you calling them that doesnt make them that
  1434.  
  1435. VÆX08.11.2018
  1436. You calling them doesn't make it right either
  1437.  
  1438. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1439. Calling other peoples arguments logical fallacies without being able to actually give a reason why they shouldn't follow the arguments they provided is not what I'd call being right.
  1440.  
  1441. COMMENT: I did give multiple counter-arguments to their arguements, to which the had none and instead just switched the topic and later repeated the same argument again
  1442.  
  1443. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1444. no but the fact that they are does
  1445. I listed your quotes and logical falacies for you already
  1446. read up(bearbeitet)
  1447.  
  1448. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1449. Claiming to be right and factual is a logical fallacy
  1450.  
  1451. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1452. lol
  1453.  
  1454. VÆX08.11.2018
  1455. Can you look more into what diversity means? Or you want to continue forcing your ideas to the community that make no sense?
  1456.  
  1457. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1458. no it isnt
  1459. Im not forcing it
  1460.  
  1461. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1462. Show me the place where you have carried out an actual study and have proof that your ideas will work 100%
  1463. Cause saying something doesn't make it any more fact than anyone else saying it
  1464.  
  1465. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1466. Im telling you how you are wrong and how the mod could be made more attractive. And you throw a fit
  1467.  
  1468. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1469. And I'm telling you that you are wrong
  1470.  
  1471. VÆX08.11.2018
  1472. Yes you are. You are claiming Xenoes are played wrong, but in reality they are perfect like they are, diversed from the other Pirate factions present in Liberty, with a repsheet according to their role
  1473.  
  1474. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1475. now who's right?
  1476.  
  1477.  
  1478. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1479. I'm not listing you my peer reviewed articles. I'd dox myself
  1480.  
  1481. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1482. You because its your view? or me because its mine?
  1483.  
  1484. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1485. because my arguments contain facts and logical conclusions
  1486. and yours dont
  1487.  
  1488. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1489. Says who
  1490. You?
  1491. Bias.
  1492.  
  1493. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1494. says logic
  1495.  
  1496. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1497. Says who?
  1498. You again?
  1499. Bias again.
  1500.  
  1501. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1502. read up what the logical falacies you used are
  1503. its not only me
  1504.  
  1505. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1506. You're biased
  1507.  
  1508. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1509. I didnt invent them
  1510. you're acting like a child again
  1511.  
  1512. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1513. No, I'm acting like you.
  1514. Insistent that I'm right regardless of anything.
  1515.  
  1516. VÆX08.11.2018
  1517. lol
  1518.  
  1519. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1520. you're following a meme that others made, who didnt have anyo other arguemnts, jsut like you
  1521.  
  1522. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1523. What meme?
  1524.  
  1525. VÆX08.11.2018
  1526. How self-centered can you be Karlotta?
  1527.  
  1528. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1529. Calling you biased?
  1530. Thats a fact.
  1531. You are biased.
  1532.  
  1533. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1534. I'm right regardless of the logical falacies you use, yes
  1535.  
  1536. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1537. You also have a victim complex.
  1538.  
  1539. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1540. because you dont work with facts and logic
  1541. just more ad hominems
  1542.  
  1543. VÆX08.11.2018
  1544. Bias is real...I'm not siding with #TeamMeme, I'm siding with the Liberty Factional lore...And fail to see logic in your reasoning Karlotta
  1545.  
  1546. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1547. Correct.
  1548. Never done a logical thing in my life
  1549. Absolutely just bullshitted my way to where I am
  1550.  
  1551. COMMENT: apeal ot authority falacy
  1552.  
  1553. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1554. ok. explain to me how I am victimizing myself when I tell you your arguemenst are not valid
  1555. oh... you cant. Becasue its just another ad hominem you pulled out of your hat
  1556.  
  1557. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1558. Whats the meme directed to you that I didn't make?
  1559.  
  1560. VÆX08.11.2018
  1561. Well, you bring up points where you wish to change Xeno ID to yet another Pirate ID , by changing their gameplay
  1562.  
  1563. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1564. Seems like victimization of yourself to me
  1565.  
  1566. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1567. lots of people bullshit their way to where they are COMMENT: reply to Sean "Absolutely bullshitted to my way to where I am"
  1568. changin their gameplay by expanding it, without forcing them to expand it COMMENT: reply to VAEX
  1569.  
  1570. VÆX08.11.2018
  1571. You are childish, don't argue. Grow up, child. Your arguments are invalid child...Child....Child?
  1572. That's you
  1573. literally
  1574.  
  1575. COMMENT: Not saying "dont argue", saying "dont use apeal to authority, non sequiturs, strawmen, arguement by repetition, apeal to majority" as arguments
  1576.  
  1577. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1578. Yea, cause you enjoyed that so much when offered a chance to change the story line
  1579.  
  1580. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1581. jsut pointing it out, hoping you will make an effort to behave less childishly
  1582.  
  1583. VÆX08.11.2018
  1584. xD
  1585.  
  1586. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1587. You remember that you complained when an event happened to allow you to change the story
  1588.  
  1589. VÆX08.11.2018
  1590. That's just
  1591.  
  1592. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1593. right?
  1594.  
  1595. VÆX08.11.2018
  1596. LoOOOOOOoool
  1597.  
  1598. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1599. Now youre advocating it for other factions(bearbeitet)
  1600.  
  1601. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1602. now you're talking about the crayter vs outcast event?
  1603. really?
  1604.  
  1605. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1606. Yes I am
  1607.  
  1608. Foxglove08.11.2018
  1609. Can we delete pobs
  1610.  
  1611. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1612. great logic there dude
  1613.  
  1614. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1615. I'm also going to talk about how more CR logged than Outcasts did, removing the entire argument of not enough players on ourside before you say it
  1616.  
  1617. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1618. can you like... think if what you say even makes sense in this situation before you say it? Please?
  1619.  
  1620. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1621. Explain the difference to me
  1622. Player driven story
  1623. Player driven lore
  1624.  
  1625. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1626. more outcasts than CR logged. Just in some times of day the CR were inthe majority
  1627.  
  1628. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1629. Both given, neither forced to have you interact with it
  1630.  
  1631. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1632. they lost big time, in case you havent noticed
  1633.  
  1634. VÆX08.11.2018
  1635. FoxgloveToday at 2:59 PM
  1636. Can we delete pobs
  1637. Contact Wesker.com/Pobdeletion.php
  1638.  
  1639. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1640. I also noticed that they spent a day whining instead of trying to do anything about it
  1641.  
  1642. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1643. nice change of subject though
  1644.  
  1645. Foxglove08.11.2018
  1646. :boxing_glove:
  1647.  
  1648. VÆX08.11.2018
  1649. Yeah, It's Vagrants chat Karlotta after all
  1650.  
  1651. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1652. and another failed attempt at ad hominem
  1653. hey... you were the ones talking about xenos
  1654.  
  1655. VÆX08.11.2018
  1656. Please...Take this chatter over to a thread in Forums, or yet Disco OFL Discord?
  1657.  
  1658. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1659. then you started talking about crayter vs outcasts
  1660.  
  1661. VÆX08.11.2018
  1662. How is this relevant to Vagrants btw?
  1663.  
  1664. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1665. I may talk about what I want
  1666.  
  1667. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1668. you wanna stop talking about it, sure, I dont care
  1669.  
  1670. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1671. Just like I lead you to that, instead of switching it
  1672.  
  1673. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1674. you lead to that with another attempted ad hominem
  1675. saying stuff that wasnt true
  1676.  
  1677. Foxglove08.11.2018
  1678. This is general, I guess
  1679.  
  1680. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1681. great effort
  1682.  
  1683. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1684. so, now that you've called it out, whats the difference between that event and adding lines to the xeno ID
  1685. it offers chance for expansion
  1686.  
  1687. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1688. oh man
  1689. seriously?
  1690.  
  1691. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  1692. Discord ofl is dead
  1693.  
  1694. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1695. Yea I want to know
  1696. Why did you take offense at that
  1697. and then argue for a similar thing
  1698.  
  1699. VÆX08.11.2018
  1700. I ate gabbage too
  1701.  
  1702. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  1703. Without Jack, Meph and Golanski there's just not enough drama or lulz to keep it alive
  1704.  
  1705. VÆX08.11.2018
  1706. Buff Gabbage
  1707.  
  1708. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1709. you want to know the different between allowing xenos to ask for credits, and removing a base by pitting two factions against each other?
  1710.  
  1711. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1712. Yea
  1713. I wanna know why
  1714. since your argument about our lore reasoning was that since it was made by players it can be changed by players
  1715. So
  1716. we have an event that used the logic
  1717. Now
  1718. why did you have issue with it
  1719.  
  1720. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1721. I'm sorry, but if you cant answer that yourself, there's little point in attempting to answer it for you
  1722. you're simply unable to use logic(bearbeitet)
  1723.  
  1724. VÆX08.11.2018
  1725. What about you?
  1726.  
  1727. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1728. I'm very good at it
  1729. my university, my job, and my iq tests have demonstratd it
  1730.  
  1731. VÆX08.11.2018
  1732. That's what your self-centered "You" says, yes...But Diversity is something you do not understand
  1733.  
  1734. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1735. Ok, so I did ask for the reason
  1736.  
  1737. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1738. as have my scientific publications
  1739.  
  1740. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1741. Clearly I don't know it
  1742. would you care to enlighten me instead of changing the subject
  1743. hypocrite.
  1744.  
  1745. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1746. hey.. you asked. I answered
  1747. (vaex)
  1748. you were the one changing the subject
  1749.  
  1750. COMMENT: he changed the subject from letting xenos pirates to crayter vs outcasts event
  1751.  
  1752. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  1753. Karlotta watches rick and morty
  1754.  
  1755. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1756. Karlotta is unable to answer a question without reverting to the logical fallacies I was accused of
  1757. next i'll be called a child again
  1758. and then the cycle begins anew
  1759.  
  1760. COMMENT: He asked a ridiculous off topic question and then used the fact taht I call it a ridiculous off topic question to say I use ad hominems.
  1761.  
  1762. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1763. yes you will
  1764. you're a child
  1765.  
  1766. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1767. I'm gonna get a job as a psychic
  1768.  
  1769. VÆX08.11.2018
  1770. Sean, grow up...Karlotta is way more mature by bringing his/her ego to the equation
  1771.  
  1772. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1773. a fitting job for a bullshitter COMMENT: answering sean "I'm gonna get a job as a psychic"
  1774.  
  1775. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1776. now i'm being attacked instead of my argument
  1777. which by the way
  1778.  
  1779. COMMENT: He wasn't providing any arguments in what I replied to
  1780.  
  1781. VÆX08.11.2018
  1782. Child
  1783.  
  1784. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1785. was ignored with a claim of how much more logical they are so they don't need to answer it
  1786.  
  1787. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1788. well you're doing all this to draw attention to the fact taht all your previous attempts at logic crumbled
  1789.  
  1790. VÆX08.11.2018
  1791. Karlotta, one question for your scientific mature self-centered self.
  1792. Define 'Diversity'
  1793.  
  1794. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  1795. Just bang already guys omg
  1796.  
  1797. VÆX08.11.2018
  1798. Get us a room plz
  1799.  
  1800. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  1801. Why argue so much over a video game
  1802.  
  1803. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1804. look in a dictionary?
  1805.  
  1806. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1807. No, I'm actually surprised how quickly you did all the things you accused of me after I asked why you had issues with the event
  1808.  
  1809. VÆX08.11.2018
  1810. Well, I'm looking an answer to all-knowing you to be honest, I trust science
  1811.  
  1812. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1813. I mean, you could have answered, and then
  1814. But yea, it's not worth it.
  1815. Clearly giving you a chance to explain that to me since I didn't know was a mistake. Guess we'll never know the reasons
  1816.  
  1817. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  1818. Discovery sucks, the admins are terrible, go mine Iridium
  1819.  
  1820. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1821. I agree lyth
  1822.  
  1823. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1824. I didnt use strawmen, or non sequitor, or calls to authority, or even ad hominem to try to jsutify my arguemnts. I onnly used 1 ad hominem (calling you a child) and 1 call to authority, but not to justify myself, only to answer your questions
  1825. I hope you're not the admins sean btw
  1826.  
  1827. VÆX08.11.2018
  1828. I don't mine Irridium, I only blast the transports heading in and out.
  1829.  
  1830. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1831. please tell me you arent
  1832. although that would explain a lot of things seen from the admin team
  1833.  
  1834. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1835. Sure
  1836.  
  1837. VÆX08.11.2018
  1838. Cmon don't bring that logic into how anyone is being an admin or not...This has nothing to do with his position in the server.
  1839. I believe there are most of us who simply disagree with your illogical arguments
  1840. And you who don't understand factional diversity in Liberty
  1841. Choices for the players to play a role
  1842. And not to make look things as one
  1843. It's you who doesn't understand diversity, so please...Stop trying to fix stuff that don't need to be fixed
  1844.  
  1845. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1846. also, I didnt even call you a bullshitter (which sparked your complaint about logical falcies). You implied you were a bullshitter first by saying sarcastically you bullshited yourself to where you are, and then by saying you'd get a job as a psychic
  1847.  
  1848. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1849. I never said you did
  1850.  
  1851. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1852. well, you said I used all the logical falacies you did
  1853. doesnt that imply it?
  1854.  
  1855. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1856. No
  1857.  
  1858. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1859. you said it right after I sadi that tho
  1860.  
  1861. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1862. Cause me calling myself a bullshitter isn't a logical fallacy
  1863.  
  1864. VÆX08.11.2018
  1865. Buff Nomads, nerf humans
  1866.  
  1867. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1868. Stop being so defensive about everything
  1869. who wants a set of supersonics
  1870.  
  1871. VÆX08.11.2018
  1872. How much?
  1873.  
  1874. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1875. read up waht you said. I merely answered to waht you said and implied
  1876.  
  1877. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1878. they're ugly and I don't want them anymore
  1879.  
  1880. VÆX08.11.2018
  1881. How much?
  1882. For 4?
  1883.  
  1884. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1885. how much for supersonics?
  1886.  
  1887. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1888. free vex
  1889.  
  1890. VÆX08.11.2018
  1891. Gib!
  1892.  
  1893. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1894. just get them off my ship
  1895.  
  1896. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1897. can I have them for free?
  1898.  
  1899. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1900. these are disgusting
  1901.  
  1902. VÆX08.11.2018
  1903. Logging now
  1904. Conn?
  1905.  
  1906. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1907. BIAS!
  1908.  
  1909. VÆX08.11.2018
  1910. I called dibs :stuck_out_tongue:
  1911.  
  1912. Sean-Chan08.11.2018
  1913. I never said no
  1914. oh the black hole jumphole is still here
  1915. gonna yeet these supers into it(bearbeitet)
  1916.  
  1917. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  1918. Lol someone is trying to hack my roblox account
  1919.  
  1920. VÆX08.11.2018
  1921. NOES
  1922. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  1923. Forgot I even had one
  1924.  
  1925. VÆX08.11.2018
  1926. Come to Conn Sean, I will get them off ya
  1927.  
  1928. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1929. whats a roblox account?
  1930.  
  1931. Lythrilux08.11.2018
  1932. How do you not know what roblox is?
  1933. And you say you're educated!
  1934. Google it
  1935. Oh shit my WordPress account got hacked tho
  1936.  
  1937. Foxglove08.11.2018
  1938. Have you not watched that music video of Yeezy and 6ix9ine?
  1939.  
  1940. Karlotta08.11.2018
  1941. I dont think gaming counts as "education"
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement