A moderator on Reddit, speaking in their official capacity, posted the following comment:

'Singal is an extremist hatemonger calling for the total eradication of trans people. He has hounded and harassed children in his genocidal crusade. No one is fooled by his mask of civility and thin veneer of "just asking questions." I would encourage everyone to report his account.'

Analyze whether this statement could constitute defamation under U.S. law. Please consider the following:

The difference between fact and opinion in defamation cases.

How hyperbolic language like 'genocidal' or 'crusade' might be interpreted in a legal context.

Whether the accusations of specific actions, such as 'hounding and harassing children,' strengthen a defamation claim.

How courts might weigh the intent or malice of the speaker, particularly in the context of public discourse and a potential public figure.

Whether a defamation suit could compel Reddit to reveal the moderator's identity.

Provide a clear and balanced analysis of these issues.