Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- puma
- CoMBo: gay
- 13:44 puma
- didnt know 4chan vids had sound, i guess they are just muted on site?
- 13:44 nano has joined (web790@war.freeshells.org)
- nano has left IRC (Connection closed)
- puma
- https://reclaimthenet.org/gab-trends/ https://trends.gab.com/
- 13:59 JanBrady has left ()
- puma
- drudge _alternative_
- 14:03 puma
- https://old.reddit.com/r/FreeSpeech/comments/do9awo/best_and_worst_colleges_and_universities_for_free/
- puma
- why he hate working class ppl?
- infspire
- puma: How do you feel about Trump?
- puma
- infspire: he's ok
- infspire
- puma: What do you like most about him?
- infspire
- What do dislike most about him?
- puma
- that he doesnt want death to america, trying to stop illegals
- puma
- that he doesnt want to stop legal immigration
- 14:15 infspire
- puma: Why is immigration death to America?
- JanBrady has joined (~irc@h82.34.128.40.static.ip.windstream.net)
- puma
- depends on the immigration, but mostly they lean WAY left, are less supportive of free speech, are a net loss tax-wise, and i belive demographics largely is desitny
- puma
- also "you are not a horse just because you are born in a stable"
- infspire
- What evidence do you have they lean "WAY left"?
- puma
- you dont know this??
- infspire
- I am ready to receive your evidence for your claim.
- zorg has joined (~zorg@c-73-241-244-241.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- puma
- infspire: heres it the freee speech http://0x0.st/zYjy.jpg
- infspire inspects
- robotnik
- let his ignorance hurt himself
- puma
- infspire: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/behind-trumps-victory-divisions-by-race-gender-education/ft_16-11-09_exitpolls_race_ethnicity/
- puma
- everyone on the right should be against immigrants from non-white countries
- puma
- or you will lose EVERYTHING FOREVER
- puma
- who has said that for years?
- puma
- ofc fear ans scare tactics has been around since forever ...
- FungiFox has left IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
- infspire
- puma: Looking at these results, one possibility that occurs to me is that white-Americans may have anti-American attitudes at higher levels than non-white-Americans.
- infspire
- Have you considered that?
- puma
- in what way?
- infspire
- puma: Are you familiar with Federalist 10 by James Madison?
- puma
- no
- infspire
- puma: Are you familiar with the Federalist Papers more broadly?
- puma
- no
- infspire
- They're essays written by Madison, Jay, and Hamilton on why the colonies should ratify the proposed Constitution.
- infspire
- In Federalist 10, which is one of the most important essays in American political history, Madison argues the *primary* threat against the proposed republic is factionalism.
- infspire
- Factionalism is one a person or group of people put their interests above the republic or whole.
- infspire
- In my opinion, this is *the* primary challenge in all of governance across human history.
- infspire
- That is, Madison is a genius.
- infspire
- He argues it's not possible to stop factionalism from existing, as it is animated by liberty itself.
- infspire
- And so we must allow factionalism, but too much factionalism destroys the republic, and so the republic must manage its levels.
- infspire
- What I am seeing in this data you're presenting is that white-Americans are one of the most ethnically-racially factional groups of people in the republic.
- infspire
- Federalist 10 isn't very long -- I strongly encourage you to read it.
- infspire
- The ideals of the American republic, puma, have never been about ethnical or racial homogeneity.
- infspire
- In fact, that would be anathema to the ideals of the republic.
- infspire
- There is no physical appearance identity to 'America', only an ideological one.
- infspire
- That religion and state should be separate, that free speech is noble and moral, that violence in response to speech is immoral, etc.
- puma
- infspire: so how are whites have anti-american attitudes, when the non-whites dont value free speech as much?
- infspire
- I take issue with these questions by the CATO institute.
- infspire
- But, I do take them under partial advisement.
- infspire
- One, the CATO institute is historically a Koch organization.
- infspire
- The Kochs are/were oil billionaires who have created a vast network of propaganda organizations to push their right-libertarian policies.
- infspire
- Now, free speech is a metonym for the free speech clause in the First Amendment, which concerns the relationship between the state and the speech of citizens.
- infspire
- The first question has literally nothing to do with that.
- puma
- we have the same results here in norway
- puma
- 80% of muslims vote left
- infspire
- What you think is racist or not has literally nothing to do with the role of the state in regards to the citizen.
- infspire
- The fourth question is also meaningless.
- infspire
- In regards to "free speech".
- infspire
- The third question is insufficient without knowledge of whether or not those who think hate speech is violence would pass legislation to modify the historical concept of free speech.
- infspire
- The second question does indicate a misunderstanding of how rights work.
- infspire
- And I find that useful information.
- infspire
- Rights are not removed due to lack of respect.
- puma
- i doubt left wing findings too, its only human
- infspire
- puma: I was a right-libertarian in my youth.
- infspire
- The CATO institute was one of my primary sources of political analysis.
- infspire
- I don't doubt them because they're on the right.
- infspire
- I doubt them because they're part of the Koch network.
- infspire
- And the Koch network has a rich history of propganda.
- infspire
- The entire goal of the Koch network is to keep the Koch's billions by deregulating government so government doesn't regulate the oil industry.
- infspire
- That's it.
- infspire
- That is extraordinarily anti-democratic.
- infspire
- puma: I have a more fundamental challenge to your entire argument.
- infspire
- The reason immigrants are more to the left than the right in many countries is because the right is fundamentally not compatible with modernity.
- puma
- pls give me the summary, im off to bed
- infspire
- The entire modernity project is a leftist project.
- infspire
- All of the ideals of the West since the Peace of Westphalia in 1648 are 'leftist'.
- infspire
- This inexorable progress towards leftist ideals has been punctuated by right-wing resurgences that attempt to revert Western society to its monarchial roots.
- infspire
- The fundamental principles of the right are that 'my faction should be empowered, but not bound, and all rival factions shall be bound, but not empowered'.
- infspire
- The ideals of a free, open, pluralistic, merit-based, non-class, non-caste system is a leftist project.
- puma
- hehehehehe
- infspire
- puma: 'Whites' are not more terrible than other groups.
- infspire
- There are no human races.
- infspire
- Recall Madison's ideology -- factionalism is THE primary problem.
- infspire
- Why, then, is white culture the proximal primary problem in the West?
- infspire
- Because it is the dominant faction.
- infspire
- It has the most to gain by trying to hold onto its factional dominance and movement to equality.
- infspire
- If Muslims or blacks or Chinese or Russians were the dominant faction, they'd do the same things.
- infspire
- The goal of an American is to not empower factions, but to empower ideology.
- infspire
- The migration of non-whites into Europe and America will dilute white power, mitigating the effects of the dominant faction, and is thus good.
- infspire
- It is deeply American to desire immigration.
- infspire
- Of course, immigration also creates other costs, as humans take awhile to learn to get along with those who look, speak, and think differently than they do.
- infspire
- And so those costs have to be offset by the gains from reducing white factional power.
- infspire
- I think the status quo is that white supremacist attitudes are one of the primary problems in the republic, and so I don't worry about immigration at this time.
- infspire
- puma: If this analysis seems unusual to you, I'm largely using John Rawls' notion of the 'veil of ignorance' to construct society without knowing my identity or place in the society that I am constructing.
- puma
- it is a bit _unusual
- puma
- _
- infspire
- This is consistent with both Kant's deontology, as Rawls was a neo-Kantian, and Madison's deep narrative about human nature (equivalent in scope to Marx' conception about materialism 60 years later).
- infspire
- puma: Perhaps allow me to close with one artistic citation.
- infspire
- America isn't easy. America is advanced citizenship. You've gotta want it bad, cause it's gonna put up a fight. It's gonna say 'You want free speech? Let's see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, and who's standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours.' You want to claim this land as the land of the free? Then the
- infspire
- symbol of your country cannot just be a flag. The symbol also has to be one of its citizens exercising his right to burn that flag in protest. Now show me that, defend that, celebrate that in your classrooms. Then you can stand up and sing about the land of the free.
- infspire
- America isn't easy, puma -- it's advanced citizenship.
- abum
- i feel inspired
- infspire
- And it's lot more nuanced that 'defend the white man's faction'.
- abum scratches butt
- puma
- leftists really are full of themselves
- infspire
- Which is somewhat a strawman of your position, puma.
- infspire
- But also contains some important content.
- infspire
- puma: Do you have any substantive rebuttals?
- puma
- dont pretend you are talking to me, you opened up 100 cans of worms
- puma
- im too tired for this shit
- zorg has left IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
- infspire
- When you're more rested, I'd be interested in hearing any substantive rebuttals you may have.
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment