3 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-19 1655 +Surfpurzel´s Funpage XD

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-01-19 1655 +Surfpurzel´s Funpage XD
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/gPPw98F9uF3
https://pastebin.com/ugdL2C9L
__


+Surfpurzel´s Funpage XD __ How do you determine whether an event is a "hoax" or not?



With the "Hebo Hoax" it was pretty obvious, right? A guy allegedly got shot in the head at close range and precisely nothing a "hoaxtard" would expect to happen - happened.



That was an easy one.



But how are you determining other events?



*I would have thought "Jeff Bauman's" injuries would have caused significant doubt.*



Why?



With a fake event someone with those injuries "Jeff Bauman" allegedly had can survive 100% of the time.



*But with a real event the survival rate surely cannot be 100%.* With 100 "Boston Marathon Bombings" there would be some where "Jeff Bauman" did not survive to wave a "Boston Strong" flag just a couple of days or weeks later.



So how is it you determine whether an event is BS or not?



How are you examining the event in a way that does not cause you to be a "hoaxtard"?



How can "hoaxtards" be more like you than "hoaxtards"?