Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-30 0020 +Anthony B.

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-03-30 0020 +Anthony B.
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/AgFNMyjkTyR
https://pastebin.com/uJ05SkgD
__


+Anthony B. __ I obviously don't agree that they are the same person. *I don't want to see you make a mistake.* With this your reputation is on the line. The "scrolling glitch" debacle should show you that evidence can suggest something but it not turn out to be the case.

I am in Terran's debt (again) for applying brakes to me as he did. I wanted to see more than was there to see. The theory I came up with was sound - _just wrong (for that situation)._

In hindsight I was getting encouraged to see the "scrolling glitch" as being significant. "Peekay" knew it was nothing and so pretended he didn't know what it was so as to make it seem important.

I was always aware of it being a trap but it didn't matter to me *because the central claim was about his undeniable focus on the number "333".*

In other words - I'd caught him but by giving value to the wrong thing *I let him off the hook.* Not to me. Not to those who understand what happened. But to his audience of retards - and I kick myself - _regularly_ - for squandering that opportunity to reach vulnerable people. *It is a mistake I won't repeat.*

I had objective proof (the video with "333 views"). That was objective proof. *That was sufficient proof of shenanigans.* Everything else was just icing - at best - though it turned out not to be.

But you don't have any objective proof. You don't have sufficient proof. *All you have is the equivalent of a "scrolling glitch".*

If you don't learn from my mistake you will end up repeating it. Right now it's not too late to abort.

How can you be sure you're not just being set up? Anyone can put together a PDF. Anyone can add anything to it.

I'll wait and see what your evidence is. *Until then you have not proved they are the same person.*

All you have done is suggest it and some other people - for whatever reason - appear to be going along with it. _It's a placebo planet after all._

A PDF cannot prove anything any more than the "Harry Potter" series proves there are wizards. A PDF is not a photo of "Jeff C". A PDF isn't a recording of "Stefan Molyneux's" voice hosting a "Jeff C" podcast or vice-versa.

I'm curious. Do you suppose "Jeff C" is the normal voice or is it "Stefan Molyneux"? Could it be there is a third voice that's the "real" voice? Have you heard "Jeff C" try to do accents? He sucks at it. Though maybe you'd say that's an inside joke?!

*This is all very baffling.*

I hope you can understand that without compelling evidence (like how I had the "333 views" video as opposed to having only a "scrolling glitch" video) *I must distance myself from this claim because I have been dragged into it (by you know who).* Had that not happened I would have remained silent because I have a dozen other things I need to be focusing on first etc.