Dear all,I am not sure we understood each other perfectly, since what I offered (and sent over e-mail to confirm) was as follows: "I am willing to transfer my share to Guillaume for the price of 1K EUR paid by him and a debt with Lead Alchemist Studio of 28K EUR and the cancelation of provisions pertaining myself in the shareholders agreement. I will provide an exclusive and unlimited license to everything I produced while at LAS."However, I see that in the documents only partially:a] I see all those conditions as inseparable, hence I don't see it as logical to sign a sale of 10% for 1000 EUR and a service agreement concerning the 28K and a license separately.b] In the service agreement I don't see mentioning of the fact that the Work is already complete (as far as the price and this agreement is concerned).c] The limitations from the SAH are not mentioned in any way. I guess these are also intended to be resolved in a separate agreement.
To sum it up, the deal I offered was 10% and the license for 29K EUR and the cancellation of the limitations from the SAH. We agreed that to smooth out the transfer I will transfer my 10% directly to GG for the nominal price of 1000EUR with the rest being a debt in some form by Lead Alchemist. On the other hand I never intended to separate this, since I see it as one, let's say, quid pro quo.

I will discuss this on Tuesday with a lawyer, however the points I've already mentioned seem to put me, from a layman perspective, in a needlessly disadvantageous position.
best regards Michal Hapala