Not a member of Pastebin yet?
Sign Up,
it unlocks many cool features!
- ********************
- The Man From U.N.C.L.E. Movie Hindi Free Download
- http://urllio.com/qyv8u
- (Copy & Paste link)
- ********************
- In the early 1960s, CIA agent Napoleon Solo and KGB operative Illya Kuryakin participate in a joint mission against a mysterious criminal organization, which is working to proliferate nuclear weapons.
- 1963, the height of the Cold War. In an unlikely alliance, a CIA agent, Napoleon Solo and KGB agent, Illya Kuryakin, band together to save the world from nuclear disaster. A top nuclear scientist, formerly employed by the US, has gone missing. It is suspected his brother has kidnapped him to work on a nuclear bomb. Solo and Kuryakin accompany the scientist's daughter, Gaby, to Rome, as this is where her uncle is based. The idea is to covertly investigate his company and, hopefully, find the scientist and the bomb. Things aren't all plain sailing though. This is heightened by the fact that Solo and Kuryakin aren't sure they can trust each other and, to some extent, still regard each other as enemies.
- I love spy novels and movies. <br/><br/>I Can't remember the last time I walked out of a movie before this one. Just awful. No chemistry, dull dialog, no dramatic tension. Like listening to a first script reading. <br/><br/>Dull, Dull, Dull.<br/><br/>There were plenty of action moments, they just fell completely flat and lifeless. Not a character to care for within a 300 mile radius.<br/><br/>And none of the spark of ingenuity of the original series.<br/><br/>How could they have gotten it so wrong?<br/><br/>Hard to see, in this day and age, how such drek doesn't get weeded out in the story-boarding, in the run-throughs, in the filming, and certainly in the editing.
- I was raised in the 1960's. Even before the original series of The Man From U.N.C.L.E. aired, I knew I was going to love it. And I did. Watching the adventures of Napoleon Solo and Illya Kuryakin each week was a joy -- until the dreaded third season, when a show-runner was brought in who clearly had no understanding of the show. That's also what happened with this movie. Don't get me wrong: the movie is enjoyable enough -- it's just not The Man From U.N.C.L.E. They borrowed the names, but then gave us some other movie. Worth seeing? Perhaps. It's a decent enough adventure flick. U.N.C.L.E.? Not even close. The casting was somewhat on-target. Henry Cavill as Napoleon was pretty good, and he looked the part. Hugh Grant was nice as Alexander Waverly (though a mere shadow of the always wonderful Leo G. Carroll.) His part was small, so hard to get a complete read. Armie Hammer as Illya? No, sorry! As a generic action performer, okay. But as the sophisticated Russian agent, way off target. Another example of this actor being miscast... which seems to be the bulk of his career, so far. Also miscast was the director: Guy Ritchie. He tried to throw in Every Trick from Every Movie he's done. Some of them worked, but not most. As a screenwriter, he gave his lead characters backgrounds that were particularly lame. Solo's was downright hackneyed. I don't want to engage in spoilers, here: Ritchie just added a background that's been used in about 2 million spy movies in the past 50 years. (Well, maybe only 1-1/2 million. Consult The Ipcress File for more information.) Alicia Vikander, by the way, was good, and suitably attractive. Her part was not in the original TV series, so stands alone in the film. The villain name Alexander was used in the movie, but appears to be no relation to the excellent villain in the series (played by the also wonderful Rip Torn.) The screenwriter borrows a couple of additional names from Ian Fleming, possibly due to Fleming's short-lived connection to the original series. We were all treated to the extreme over-use of the name "Count Lippe" (refer to Thunderball.) To sum up, if you want an average action spy movie, this one will do. If you're after The Man From U.N.C.L.E., buy the series on DVD.
- There’s some nice early-60s period production design and the whole thing moves along smoothly, if unhurriedly. But it never delivers anything like the punch of Tom Cruise’s M:I adventures, nor the wit and distinctiveness of 007.
- The film is based on the television series of the same name that ran on NBC from 1964 to '68. The series was an espionage adventure about two secret agents, Napoleon Solo (<a href="/name/nm0001816/">Robert Vaughn</a>) and Illya Kuryakin (<a href="/name/nm0564724/">David McCallum</a>) who worked for an organization named the United Network Command for Law and Enforcement (U.N.C.L.E.) The series was different from most other spy series of the time in that the agents were not acting on behalf of any country or government, but a private organization that was dedicated to fighting crime and evildoers. This was evidenced by the fact that the two agents on the series were an American (Solo) and a Russian (Kuryakin) working together during the Cold War. Their primary antagonist was a criminal network known as THRUSH which was dedicated to taking over the world. No. No, but some extra information about some of the characters are shown during the credits. See here or here for more information. a5c7b9f00b
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
