Advertisement
JaysonSunshine

Insecurity of BadWolf

Sep 21st, 2019
114
0
Never
Not a member of Pastebin yet? Sign Up, it unlocks many cool features!
text 2.25 KB | None | 0 0
  1.  
  2. innit
  3. I am anti-theist.
  4. innit
  5. I give zero though about how sub-human theists will react to that.
  6. BadWolf
  7. Not you arnt.
  8. innit
  9. I already did all of this years ago, chonkin.
  10. innit
  11. I'm advanced in my atheism at this point.
  12. chonkin
  13. innit: okay fine. That's a good strong honest way to be in an IRC chatroom. No doubt
  14. innit
  15. I already debated theists for 15,000 hours.
  16. 11:58 innit
  17. I did my time.
  18. Bullnitiative gives innit a certificate or something.
  19. BadWolf
  20. And you learnt nothing.
  21. 11:58 chonkin
  22. But in public, I'm going to describe myself as a methodological naturalist. This means I wait patiently for any evidence of angels interacting with humans. I wait and wait and I dont hold my breath.
  23. innit
  24. BadWolf: I encourage you to avoid fallacies.
  25. innit
  26. chonkin: That is violative of science in a profound way.
  27. innit
  28. If I ask you, So, do you believe in angels, what would you say?
  29. BadWolf
  30. I'll use fallacies as I god damn please mr non sequitar.
  31. chonkin
  32. innit: No it is the very heart of science. IF angels were found next week, my science book would quickly and easily integrate them into their chapters. Your book might need tossed out wholesale
  33. Bullnitiative
  34. Well!
  35. BadWolf
  36. Please tell me when
  37. innit
  38. BadWolf: I do require people I engage to have control over their emotions.
  39. innit
  40. If I ask you, So, do you believe in angels, what would you say?
  41. chonkin
  42. IF angels talk to little children, we document the interactions. Graph them. Get the statistics on their interactinos with kids and publish. Bada-bing bada-boom.
  43. BadWolf
  44. innit: Your mistake dipshit, I am quite capable of using logical fallicies without emotion.
  45. chonkin
  46. innit would have to "overturn" his entire worldview.
  47. xsnlx has left IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
  48. innit
  49. BadWolf: I put you back on ignore for one week.
  50. Bullnitiative
  51. Tisk, tisk, tisk.
  52. crisp
  53. What are you guys talking about
  54. innit
  55. chonkin: It appears you refuse to engage my question on angels.
  56. chonkin
  57. innit No I'd rather go back to your hotsauce about me violating sciene in a "profound way"
  58. innit
  59. It's very difficult for me to empathize with somebody feeling so insecure that 5 minutes after he remove them from ignore they're immediately emoting like a child.
  60. innit
  61. How insecure do you have to be.
Advertisement
Add Comment
Please, Sign In to add comment
Advertisement