22 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-09-17 0935 +PUBLIC

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-09-17 0935 +PUBLIC
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/hfV26qiuT9U
https://pastebin.com/tk7qQqyW
__

*Of course I can have an opinion about events and claims*. What I *cannot* do is *assert as a fact about reality* whether something did or did not happen _if there is no *sufficient proof_*!


>> Eventually you will ALL realise that this is *true for yourself and everyone else as well*. <<


Everyone who is asserting as a fact about reality that the Earth is a ball *may well be repeating a truth into the reality of others* but without having seen what is necessary - the *sufficient proof* - they are *at all times* relying on *TRUST* and accepting (or mistaking) proof's appearances for [actual] proof.

The lie system is a *voodoo system* - it is a *trust* system.

There are times when the alleged "ISS" appears *very fake* to me. Yet there are other times when it appears very real. So which is it? Which side do I lean toward?

I CHOOSE NEITHER! This is not because I am "sitting on the fence". It is because I am not being given *what I need to know*.

And I am left wondering - just how can it be that something real can so often appear so fake? _Perhaps it is simply the way it is being presented_.

__

When I started out I was like so many others here - I believed there were fabricated events *AND* they could be proven. This happened for me with the alleged "Boston Marathon Bombing" and the image of that dancer which had been Photoshopped - I saw that as "proof" because I reasoned: *_"If 'they' didn't need to edit it then it would not have been edited!"_*

But this was to make the "conspiracy theorists' fallacy". It didn't occur to me until LATER that editing the photo can be done merely to f_kc with the mind of those who doubt news events. That a photo had been edited IS NOT PROOF of a hoax (though if it were a hoax then the photo would necessarily NEED to be edited).

You can have a genuine photo - edit and cripple it - *so as to send crazy people over the edge*.

__

It wasn't until I began seriously examining the alleged "ISS" that I realised there is an ACTUAL *MAGIC TRICK* going on.

The discovery of that magic trick - and how it worked - ALSO applied to the *media events* (and what I had previously thought of as "proof of hoaxes").

This was a significant breakthrough.

>>>>> *Ever since then I have left everyone else in the dust and it is not my fault that only a disfigured handful of people can keep up*. <<<<<

Ever since then I have been trying to explain the simplest of things and it baffles me why more can't see it. But then I realised: it's a PERCEPTUAL MAGIC TRICK. Either you can see it or you can't and not everyone can see it. But everyone should be able to understand it on an intellectual level. And with enough good examples - it should be possible to help people to see. (Like giving people contact lenses or corrective glasses.)

__

People like "BzTwooftalk" will *claim* they were once hoaxtards. On that note - *is there any evidence of "Bz" ever being a "hoaxtard"*? He keeps saying he was once one (and is now a "reformed hoaxtard") but I am not convinced. *Are there ANY comments or videos where he called things fake*? What exactly did he call bullsh!t on? Has he ever said "I used to think X and Y event was fake?"

I am not convinced "Bz" *EVER* believed events were fabricated. Just as I am not convinced when "Surfpurzel" claims she once doubted media events. She becomes *very snakey* and *evasive* when it comes to talking about any events she may once have called "fake".

But let's pretend that "Bz" isn't lying about it. Let's pretend "Bz" really did once believe that at least some media events have been staged.

What has happened is that over time he has realised the hoaxtards *cannot prove their case*.

This has come about because of retards like "Peekay HIDES Truth" and "Retardvids" and "DITRH" and so forth flooding the "truther market" with BULLSH!T. (Which is all by design!)

Even without "Peekay" and "Retardvids" and "DITRH" - *there is no proof of fakery to be found because THE LIE SYSTEM DOES NOT MAKE [FATAL] MISTAKES*.

Why is this so hard to accept?! Can you really expect to go and see "David Copperfield" and expect him to f_kc up on stage and give the trick away?? Can we really expect "Derren Brown" to perform a trick on stage and f_kc it up and give it all away?

Of course not!

The lie system does not make [fatal] mistakes *BECAUSE IT DOES NOT ATTEMPT MAGIC TRICKS IT CANNOT GET AWAY WITH*!

And so at all times the hoaxtard RELIES upon proof's APPEARANCES. At all times the hoaxtard must rely on the "gut feeling something is fake". At all times the hoaxtard must rely on *subjective feeling*.

(IN THE SAME WAY THE REALTARD DOES THE VERY SAME THING BUT FOR THE OPPOSITE CONCLUSION!)

The hoaxtard relies upon mistaking proof's appearances for actual proof. "Peekay HIDES Truth" has made it his "thing" to promote proof's appearances as "100% CASE CLOSED!".

All of the agents against truth do this - AS WELL AS the genuine and honest hoaxtards who have gotten swept up in it all.

But if you take ANY SINGLE THING a hoaxtard says is "proof" *it WILL NEVER stand up to scrutiny*.

That's what I learned when examining the "ISS" footage. That's what I figured out when I realised there is a SIMPLE perceptual magic trick going on. That's what has led me to write the things I do.

And every time something is offered as "proof" but *inevitably* gets debunked it has the effect of demoralising the genuine and honest hoaxtard.

The genuine and honest hoaxtard ends up thinking: _"Hmmm - all of the so-called 'proof' and 'evidence' *never pans out* - it is always debunked - perhaps the events really did happen?"_.

And that's the point of it. *The planned dichotomy is about taking intellectually vulnerable people who are at risk of falling out of the lie system's voodoo and bringing them back under its influence*.

It's about converting "hoaxtards" into "realtards".

>>> And so we end up with people like "Bz" who went from (allegedly) being a "hoaxtard" to a "realtard" (event realist). <<<

But to make such a switch is to make *the very same mistake that each hoaxtard makes*!

For the love of crikey: *"Bz" has made NO PROGRESS*. None. ZERO. All he has done is redesigned his personal echo chamber!

*All he has done is SWITCH SIDES*. All he is now doing is representing the OTHER SIDE *of the same worthless coin* in the lie system's worthless currency of deceit.

Whereas I have realised the trap. I can see the planned dichotomy. I can see what's happening to people. *And I have risen above it*.

Of course I can have an opinion about events and claims - *I just cannot go asserting them as facts about reality*.

Many people don't seem to understand that when they say something IS THE CASE or IS NOT THE CASE *what they are really doing is projecting their PERSONAL OPINION onto others*.

It is the OPINION of "Surfpurzel" that the Earth is a ball. An opinion that MAY WELL BE TRUE! And it is certainly an opinion that is shared by the overwhelming majority - 99.9999999% of the population.

(I'd go so far as to say that *every* self-proclaimed flat Earther still believes the Earth is a ball - at best they may be unsure or have doubts - but gun to head they believe it's a ball. That's for a different rant, however.)

But "Surfpurzel" does not ACTUALLY know this. She may well be right - but she cannot KNOW it. At all times her belief has been founded and formed on trust and proof's appearances.

"Surfpurzel" has never been far enough away from the Earth - nor has she seen a genuine image of Earth from space that is distinguishable from CGI.

And her "explanations" for things like "lunar eclipses" are accepted by her on *TRUST* - and she trusts that the explanation is the *one* and *only* correct one. And that it will *never* be replaced by some other possibility.

"Surfpurzel" *trusts* that the "astronauts" who say the Earth is a ball are not simply lying to her. *And they might not be lying to her*! But she cannot KNOW it. She must trust.

We must ALL trust. Everyone in the lie system is FORCED TO TRUST. And that is at the root of the magic trick. And this is the point that Brian Hill is not understanding:

*WHEN YOU ACCEPT JUST ONE LIE SYSTEM EVENT AND CLAIM ON TRUST (AND MISTAKING PROOF'S APPEARANCES FOR PROOF) - WHAT HAPPENS IS YOU BECOME INCLINED TO ACCEPT OTHER EVENTS ON TRUST AND PROOF'S APPEARANCES*.

(I am typing quickly but a weak analogy could be that if you fall for ONE trick by "Derren Brown" you will probably be inclined to fall for more! Each time he tricks you - you are getting trained to be tricked by him. His misdirection works on you, etc.)

And that aspect has been one of the points nationalparksign has been making in his videos. *Every event serves as belief training*.

Every event is *training you to get better at accepting events and claims* the WAY the lie system presents them.

With each event you focus on - and come to a conclusion about - you get a little better at forming a conclusion about events presented in that way.

>> *The audience is being trained to convince itself of events and claims. The audience is getting better at convincing itself*. <<

IT MAY WELL BE THAT *ALL OF THE EVENTS AND CLAIMS ARE TRUE* - BUT BECAUSE OF THE INTENTIONAL AND SYSTEMATIC WAY THEY ARE BEING PRESENTED (WITHHOLDING "SUFFICIENT PROOF") - *YOUR FOCUS ON THEM IS TRAINING YOU TO TRAIN YOURSELF TO ACCEPT LIES WHEN THEY ARE PRESENTED AS TRUTH - SHOULD THAT EVER HAPPEN*.

When it happens you won't recognise it and you will be powerless to resist it.

__

At this point in time I have to simply accept that there will only ever be a disfigured handful of people who can grasp these VERY SIMPLE things.

People like "Surfpurzel" will not understand a fraction of 1% of the things I am writing because she isn't even playing the game. She is all worried about some comment I gave a plus one to A YEAR AGO. How the F_KC can she be expected to keep up with any of this?

She can't. None of these people can.

*All that matters to me are the disfigured handful who can PERCEIVE the lie system EVEN THOUGH you cannot quite OBJECTIVELY POINT IT OUT*.

Eventually others will come along. At least today there's about three fingers on the disfigured hand whereas 18 months ago there was just one.

Fingers are growing! Things are moving in the right direction! But progress must be expected to be excruciatingly slow before *the right number of people have cottoned on* and then it will take on a life of its own.

There are other indications progress is being made but I've already written enough.

__
+Brian Hill, +cabadejo, +nationalparksign ., +Terran Downvale