22 Lesta Nediam LNC2016-11-05 0600 +nationalparksign

Lesta Nediam LNC2016-11-05 0600 +nationalparksign
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ/posts/F6KzeeWonb8
https://pastebin.com/tg9FYX5V
__

+nationalparksign __ Yes.. before a long nutty number comment like that could be written many briefer nutty number comments would have first been written.

Over time more ways to "discover" nutty number connections are found and observance of them practiced which leads to longer and longer nutty number comments (with more and more "nutty number proof" to substantiate the desired "conclusion"!).

It is in many ways like regularly taking a drug. A tolerance inevitably forms and more and more of the drug is required to achieve the same effect. *Before a person knows it they are writing Lesta-sized comments that are filled with nutty numbers*.

Each time this happens the person becomes a little more practiced at doing so. With repetition that practice turns into a skill. And with that skill comes *thinking habits* etc.

This would be wonderful IF it had merit.

However - if what is happening has no genuine meaning or value then *no meaningful progress* is being made. Worse than that - the person is simply getting better at doing nothing beneficial. The person is getting better at noticing nothing and thinking flawed thoughts.

In addition to this there are two significant problems with the "nutty numbers":

1) *"How do you know when a number is a coded nutty number or a normal number?"* You have a huge problem if that question cannot be answered.

But let's suppose someone has an answer - there's an additional problem:

2) *If an event is being coded with nutty numbers - **_and those coded nutty numbers can be decoded_** - then that becomes proof positive of a fabricated event*! _And _*_that_*_ would represent a [fatal] mistake_.

It is my (correct!) understanding that the lie system *does not make [fatal] mistakes*. That if a [fatal] mistake is suspected it will upon scrutiny turn out to be an error made by the observer.

I have had to defend this (correct!) observation perhaps more than any other aspect of the lie system. I think that is because people *want* there to be "mistakes" that can be found. People *want* to believe they can "outsmart the lie system" which has been successfully farming the human mind (probably) from the outset.

But if there were [fatal] mistakes being made - that could be knowable - *then the entire world would already know about the lie system in an undeniable way*.

That has not happened!

Since events *do not contain genuine [fatal] mistakes* the nutty numbers simply allow a person who is paying attention *to "find proof of fakery" where it is lacking*.

_That's it!_

All that person is doing is *convincing himself or herself that an event must be fake* because (for example) some "7"s or "6"s or "666"s or whatever else triggers meaning/relevance has been cleverly "decoded".

>> *This is fool's gold and it is desperation*. <<

It is the desire for an easy victory.

Even if the nutty numbers really were being coded into events (and I strongly suggest they are not!) then only "occultists" themselves (i.e., those who these numbers are apparently intended for) can know what they really mean.

>> *Only the occultists can know which numbers have meaning and relevance and which numbers don't*. <<

If there are nutty numbers being coded into events *and you are not an "occultist"* then all you can do is *guess* at which are relevant and what their meaning could be. At all times you must be whimsical and arbitrary and this - unavoidably - fills your head with falsehoods and trains you to think superstitiously.

_This must be avoided!_

Not only that! There are so-called "Satan Calculators" (or "Conspiracy Calculators" - I forget their name) where you can plug in the date of an event and it will find dozens and dozens of "33"s and "666"s and "7"s or whatever else that "proves" an event "must be the work of the devil" (by way of nutty numbers).

I have been casually trying to find such a "calculator" via Google but without success. It has been years since I tinkered with one (they are a lot of fun) - they produce paragraphs of complete bullsh!t just like what we see in the attached comment.

If I can find the "Devil's Calculator" again I can show those who are taking it seriously that it's all a bunch of bullsh!t (like the "Mandela Effect" and "Giant Trees") being promoted by charming scumbags who are f_kcing with vulnerable minds.

I am at a loss as to how to communicate this any more strongly, thoroughly or effectively. I think I've done all I can!


______________________________________________________________
My name is Lesta Nediam and I am cracking reality like a nut.

Lesta Nediam's YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3DalBOEZ6RqSyHk8_mGV7w

Lesta Nediam's Google Plus:
https://plus.google.com/+LestaNediamHQ

Lesta Nediam's Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LestaNediam

Lesta Nediam's Public Comments:
https://pastebin.com/u/Lesta

What does not exist - exists to exist.
What exists - exists to always exist.
As it is written - so it is done.