term_memorize = ["Andrew's view", "Cardozo's View", "The Reasonable Person Standard", "Professional Standard of Care", "Res Ipsa Loquitur", "Crimnal Statute", "Type of Harm", "Class of People", "But For Causation", "Substantial Factor", "Proximate Cause: Foreseeability Test", "Superseding Intervening Forces", "Egg Shell Plaintiff", "Joint and Several Liability", "Damages", "Defenses: Contributory Negligence", "Last Clear Chance Doctrine", "Pure Comparative Negligence", "Modified Comarative Negligence", "Assumption of Risk", "Immunities"]
possible_answers = []

possible_answers.append("Foreseeable Plaintiff Cardozo's View: A duty is owed to anyone within the area/zone of danger.")
possible_answers.append("Foreseeable Plaintiff Andrew's View: A duty is owed only to foreseeable victims, viewing a duty as owing to anyone injured by another’s unreasonable conduct.")
possible_answers.append("The Reasonable Person Standard: The most common standard of care in negligence law commands the defendant to act as would a reasonably prudent person in the same or similar circumstances.")
possible_answers.append("Professional Standard of Care: Because of the specialized skill and training needed to be a doctor, lawyer, accountant, architect, or engineer, courts defer to the expertise of the profession to determine the appropriate standard of care.")
possible_answers.append("Res Ipsa Loquitur: an important and somewhat complicated form of circumstantial evidence, may, in limited situations, aid the plaintiff in establishing the defendant’s unreasonable conduct. Where res ipsa loquitur applies, a jury may infer that the defendant acted unreasonably without any other proof.")
possible_answers.append("Criminal Statute: There has to be one.")
possible_answers.append("Type of Harm: To determine whether a statute was designed protect a type of harm look at the language of the statute or from its clear legislative history.")
possible_answers.append("Class of People: Judge must also determine that the plaintiff falls in the class intended to be protected by the statute.")
possible_answers.append("But For:  For the defendant to be held liable, the plaintiff must establish that but for the defendant’s culpable conduct or activity the plaintiff would not have been injured.")
possible_answers.append("Substantial Factor: Requires that the defendant materially contributed to the plaintiff’s injury.")
possible_answers.append("Foreseeability Test: Whether the defendant should have reasonably foreseen, as a risk of her conduct, the general consequences or type of harm suffered by the plaintiff. While the result or type of harm must be reasonably foreseeable, the extent and the precise manner in which the harm occurs need not be foreseeable.")
possible_answers.append("Superseding Intervening Forces: New forces which join with the defendant’s negligence  to injure the plaintiff. Highly improbable and extraordinary intervening forces are generally found superseding and preclude liability.")
possible_answers.append("Egg Shell Plaintiff: Courts have consistently held that the defendant takes the plaintiff as he finds him.")
possible_answers.append("Joint and Several Liability: Several Indicates more than one tortfeasor. The joint indicates each of the several tortfeasors is fully liable for the entire damage.")
possible_answers.append("Damages: Medical, Lost Wages, Incidental Economic Consequences, Reduction to Present Value, Pain and Suffering, Punitive Damages")
possible_answers.append("Contributory Negligence: Conduct on the part of the plaintiff which falls below the standard of conduct to which he should conform for his own protection, and which is legally contributing cause cooperating with the negligence of the defendant in bringing about the plaintiff’s harm.")
possible_answers.append("Last Clear Chance Doctrine: Instructs the court to ignore the plaintiff’s contributory negligence if the defendant negligence occurred after the plaintiff’s contributory negligence.")
possible_answers.append("Pure Comparative Negligence: Plaintiff can recover some percentage from liable defendants regardless of the extent of their own negligence.")
possible_answers.append("Modified Comparative Negligence: Plaintiff is allowed a partial recovery just as in pure comparative negligence, until the plaintiff reaches a certain level of culpability for her own accident. ")
possible_answers.append("Assumption of Risk: A plaintiff who fully understands a risk of harm to himself or his things caused by the defendant’s conduct or by the condition of the defendant’s land or chattels, and who nevertheless voluntarily choses to enter or remain, or to permit his things to enter or remain within the area of that risk, under circumstances that manifest his willingness to accept it, I not entitled to recover. Elements: The plaintiff must (1) know a particular risk and (2) voluntarily (3) assume it.")
possible_answers.append("Immunities: Charitable immunity, Spousal Immunity, Parent Child Immunity, Governmental Immunity.")

def negligence_test():
    m = 0
    for x in possible_answers:
        print(term_memorize[m])
        new_answer = input("What is your answer? (To skip type 'skip.'): ")
        print (new_answer)
        print (x)
        if new_answer == "skip":
            m = m + 1
        else:
            if new_answer == x:
                print("Congrats!")
                m = m + 1
            else:
                print("You Lose.")
                game_over = input("Do you want to retry?: ")
                if game_over == "y":
                    m = m
                else:
                    return

negligence_test()